![]() |
|
The basics What do you hope to achieve with this site? How do you define the liberal-left? Am I part of it? Are you in bed with a particular political party? Are you against single-issue groups? I’m a bit right-wing and loathe liberals. Can I join in? Comments policy Liberal Conspiracy aims to foster a culture of constructive comments and useful dialogue between contributors and readers. We see that as vitally important in our efforts to reinvigorate the liberal-left with fresh ideas, challenge orthodoxies and forge a way forward. We have a stringent comments policy. We welcome constructive scrutiny of our views but will deal harshly with off-topic, diversionary or trollish comments. We believe in freedom of speech, but unwanted commenters are more than welcome to exercise their free speech elsewhere on the blogosphere. We don’t wish to censor them there. But we reserve the right to delete comments deemed abusive or troll-like in our space. We are not obliged to provide space to right-wing or left-wing loonies to abuse others or throw vitriol at writers. Abusive, sarcastic and troll-ish comments (aimed at writers or other commenters) will be deleted. Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted. You are welcome to write a complaint to the editors if you feel you are constantly treated unfairly. We may get back to you but we are under no obligation to. Allow us to stress once again: this is our collective blog and we have the right to set a stringent comments policy. If you do not like it you are under no obligation to participate. We value quality over quantity. Political parties Unlike other blogs dedicated to promoting specific political parties, we are dedicated to developing, discussion and promoting good ideas and policies. Some of our writers may have overt preference to specific political parties or even be members. That does not violate our rules or compromise our position. Writers and commenters are free to criticise any political party as long as they do so constructively and back it up with an argument. |
FAQs
» Coalition For Choice: supporting HFE bill
· Lesbian mothers and ‘traditional’ families · How MPs voted on abortion, and other points · It was Dorries wot lost it! All articles // Website // Facebook » Not A Day Longer: against 42 days · Burnham on Basic Principles · Davis and Greens win big in Haltemprice · Public opinion is not behind 42 days All articles // Homepage // Facebook // Petition ![]()
Upcoming events
» Progress: Progress annual conference » Compass and Progress: Winning a 4th term: what's the road to victory? (Manchester) Recently popular Lesbian mothers and 'traditional' families (107 replies) Should we take a stand on the BBC? (102 replies) We should have open primaries for elections (100 replies) We need our own space (95 replies) Andrew Gilligan's hypocrisy (85 replies) Nadine's Shame (updated) (84 replies) Is the problem that lefties are not angry enough? (83 replies)
Latest comments
» thomas posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » douglas clark posted on Burnham on Basic Principles » Humanite posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » Conor Foley posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » douglas clark posted on SNP wins Glasgow East by 365 votes » Nick posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » Whataresult! posted on Struggle not submission - SBS win over Ealing » davecole.org » blog » Blog Archive » The Glasgow East by-election posted on Yet another kicking » Pippa posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » Anthony Barnett posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » thomas posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » yellowsammy posted on An open primary for London » Nick posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » Sunny Hundal posted on New Labour's path to power is shattered » shariq posted on An open primary for London |
|