So, it’s looking like it’s lightweight, little-known Belgian Prime Minister Herman Van Rompuy for the President of the European Council, and lightweight, little-known Baroness Ashton (current UK European Commissioner, Peter Mandelson’s almost invisible replacement) for the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.
Two no-marks, for two jobs that many have claimed are among the most powerful in the world.
Does anyone seriously believe that Van Rompuy has what it takes to impose his will over the likes of Sarkozy, Merkel and Berlusconi in Council meetings?
Does anyone seriously believe that *anyone* is going to take Baroness Ashton seriously, a woman who’s been at the Commission for only a year, and was unqualified even for that? (See also…)
It’s worth noting in this US vs the NHS row is that the US has just about the highest healthcare spending in the world – 2nd highest by percentage of GDP, first by overall cost – largely because it’s among the most expensive. Time for some numbers – all freely available via Google.
I hold no brief for the NHS (and unlike most LibCon contributors tend to lean towards part-privatisation of its services), I’m just interested in the facts, so feel free to correct me if I’ve got some of the maths or figures wrong.
Of the c.15% of GDP the US spends on healthcare annually (that’s about $2.2 trillion*), around 50% is spent by the government (around $1.1 trillion). By contrast, the UK spends around 8% of its GDP on healthcare, with the Department of Health’s budget for the NHS (England**) in 2008/9 around £94 billion (about $155 billion).
The English NHS cares for 49 million people (100% of the population of England); US public healthcare currently covers about 83 million (around 28% of the US population).
continue reading… »
Last week on the BBC’s Question Time, eurosceptic Conservative MEP Daniel Hannan mentioned 84%; UKIP leader Nigel Farrage said it was 75%.
The figure most often mentioned by anti-EU types (such as French National Front leader Jean Marie Le Pen or the Libertas Party) is that 80% of our laws come from the EU, while in a speech elsewhere last week, Conservative leader David Cameron said that “Almost half of all the regulations affecting our businesses come from the EU”.
These figures (or, at least, figures in this rough ballpark) are widely accepted, with everyone from universities to charities seeming to accept them at face value.
But are any of them actually true? And which is it? 84%? 80%? 75%? 50%? Or some other figure? Because they can’t ALL be right.
| 17 Comments 14 Comments 18 Comments 9 Comments 24 Comments 55 Comments 67 Comments 2 Comments 47 Comments 9 Comments | LATEST COMMENTS » Daniel Hoffmann-Gill posted on Against multiculturalism » Alix posted on Data abuse » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » 5cc posted on Against multiculturalism » Chris Paul posted on Tory MP attacks Unite after receiving thousands from British Airways » barry faulkner posted on Tory MP attacks Unite after receiving thousands from British Airways » Lee Griffin posted on Data abuse » Will Rhodes posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » Mr S. Pill posted on Choose your scumbag of the week » Charlieman posted on Data abuse » pagar posted on Telegraph finds entrance to Narnia » George W. Potter posted on Data abuse » Bob B posted on Teenage girls have sex. Get over it. » The Same Difference Theme Tune « Same Difference posted on A Song for Cameron » Will Rhodes posted on Data abuse Last 50 // Comments feed |