To win London, Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone
I cannot help but admire the ferocity and energy behind Ken Livingstone’s bid for London. The campaign team have been organising phone-banks, leafleting events and walks around London with clockwork regularity for months.
They pore over everything Boris does and ruthlessly point out mistakes he makes or things he’s trying to hide. They’re relentless and show. They are how an opposition should be. No wonder the polls are moving in their favour.
But Ken Livingstone is still being complacent and isn’t stepping outside his comfort zone. And if he wants to win – I think he has to do that.
To explain what I mean, it’s important to look at the polls. Ken has reversed Boris’ lead by winning back Labour voters who were earlier sympathetic to Boris. He has done so with a laser-like focus on transport fares and made that a key issue like never before. Boris looks out of touch – even the polls say so.
But there are two important caveats that still give Boris an edge. First, Boris hasn’t started actively campaigning yet, and when he does he will start to define himself positively (backed by a helpful Evening standard) and win back some of that support.
Furthermore, he will go negative against Ken. He will ask: ‘do you want the guy you chucked out four years ago back again? Isn’t he tired?‘. They might even stoop to ageism (don’t put it past campaign manager Lynton Crosby). The negative campaigning will hurt Ken too. Besides, polls always narrow in favour of the incumbent as campaigning starts earnestly (happened with Labour in 2010) – so a 2 point lead isn’t enough.
Ken Livingstone, I think, needs to overcome two weaknesses to extend his narrow lead.
First: Ken has yet to outline any headline-grabbing ideas or initiatives that say he is brimming with ideas and energy. He is way behind the polls on this. He still needs to show he can tap into Londoners’ expectations of the world’s capital. Fares cannot be the only issue he talks about for the next 100 days.
Second: Ken hasn’t neutralised negative perceptions from last time. There is still some resistance to him and he faces a Tory electoral machine very good at getting its voters out. There are two groups to neutralise: Tory voters determined to come out against him (make it easier for them to stay at home on election day); Labour sympathisers who need to be persuaded he has changed so they can happily vote for him.
His campaign has been within his comfort zone – focusing on attacking Boris from the left. But Boris isn’t stupid – he’ll move to the left too.
To win – Ken has to confound expectations and surprise people who may normally dismiss him. He has to show them he is a refreshed and changed. That requires a serious attempt at neutralising negative perceptions and admitting he made some mistakes back then. Only then will some give him another chance.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
Blog ,London Mayor
31 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
I think Ken’s real comfort zone is inner London. He needs to reach out to outer London – thats where he last in 2008, and he could loose it there this time too.
Ken won’t win. There are too many Labour supporters like me who would rather walk to the polling station and back the incumbent than risk seeing Labour represented by a divisive extremist who sucks up to tyrants, antisemites and gay bashers.
Go away, old man.
Ken’s campaign is certainly energetic, as you claim.
But it isn’t any more truthful than Ken was back in the day.
For instance, they have made a lot of some modest public transport fare increases under Boris, needed to fund investment in infrastructure But they fail to mention that Ken kept fares down by putting council tax up by c £1000 per family…. and probably would again.
Boris, by contrast, is proposing a council tax freeze.
“But they fail to mention that Ken kept fares down by putting council tax up by c £1000 per family…. and probably would again.”
The GLA bit of the council tax is about £310 per year for a band D property, so how could Ken have put it up by £1,000 per family?
Hope Boris keeps going with the line about ‘modest public transport fare increases’, mind.
Fundamentally, I don’t think Ken has learnt anything from his defeat and he never admits mistakes. So not sure the signs are good for him.
donpaskini @ 4
Hope Boris keeps going with the line about ‘modest public transport fare increases’, mind.
Me too. Under the new fare system, a bus ride for a pay-as-you-go Oystercard holder will go up by a very modest 5p (from £1.30 to £1.35), except for pensioners, who travel free (and whose freedom passes have now been extended to 24 hrs per day), and JobCentre Plus pass holders whose rate has been frozen at 65p.
People who use a lot of buses can get an Oyster photocard, capped at £2.20 per day, no matter how many journeys they take.
So, in summary, the elderly & jobless pay no more. The better off are charged 5p extra per journey, or 10p per day, with unlimited journeys.
Not a big deal.
Moving to your other point, while in office, Ken increased the council tax precept 8 times, costing the average family £1000
each over the period. Or, to put it another way, the equivalent of the fare increase on 20,000 bus journeys.
Not that Ken didn’t raise fares himself, of course.
In January 2004, Ken increased the basic bus fare (this was before Oystercards were introduced) from 70p to £1 – a rise of 43% (inflation was 2.6% at the time).
The next year, in January 2005, Ken increased the discounted Oystercard rate for a bus ride by 14.3% and then – only one month later – in February 2005, he upped it again by a further 25% for peak time travel.
Then, in 2007, he slammed on another 25% rise on the Oyster off-peak fare.
In his own memoirs (see page 497) Ken admits he broke his own promises on fares.
Yes, indeed, let’s keep the focus on fares. The public aren’t stupid.
@6 – you missed out the increases in tube fares from your copying and pasting. I wonder why?
I’d love to see your workings for the claim that council tax rises cost ‘the average family’ over £1000.
@3
“For instance, they have made a lot of some modest public transport fare increases under Boris, needed to fund investment in infrastructure”
Boris has increased the cost of a single bus fare by 50%, from 90p when he took office to £1.35 now – that is far from ‘modest’. The fare rises have also been disproportionately aimed at the poor.
A useful analysis – especially as I suspect the reason Mr Livingston is ahead in the polls at the moment is visibility, and the fact that it does not appear that Mr Johnson has even started campaigning (given that all politicians are permanently on campaign anyway…). I suspect there is a set date at which the Johnson campaign will start – and up to that point, it is happy to let Mr Livingston give himself enough rope (even if Flowerpower’s council tax figures (requiring an average increase of £125 per year) are wrong, his facts on Mr Livingston’s own record on transport are not).
I can’t help but think that Mr Livingston is fatally flawed anyway. Even on transport he is vulnerable, and there are other problems. His performance after the riots, where he tried to exonorate the rioters from blame, will undoubtedly crop up again for example, as will his association with unpleasant regimes (Cuba for example) and groups. It was an obvious mistake for Labour to renominate him – was there no other Labour-supporter with public recognition and a vision for London (does Mr Livingston actually have one of those?) anywhere around London who might have been persuaded to stand?
@6
“JobCentre Plus pass holders whose rate has been frozen at 65p.”
Again, you’re ignoring the time when Boris actually increased the fare from 0p to 65p. Obviously, percentages don’t work here – but for some of the poorest people in London, and those who need to use public transport to get to interviews – it was pretty appalling.
donpaskini@7 Watchman @ 9
I’d love to see your workings for the claim that council tax rises cost ‘the average family’ over £1000.
Actually I didn’t say “over £1000″, I said ” c £1000″ (c=circa=around).
But okay – here are the workings:
The precept at the start was £123. Had Ken done what Boris has done and kept the precept frozen, then the total precept element of Council Tax payable by a family in Band D in financial years 2000-2001 to 2008-9 inclusive (the years Ken set the precept) would have been:
£123 X 9 = £1107.
But Ken kept raising the precept every year, such that the total precept payable for the period was, in fact, £2071.
£2071 – £1107 = £964 – which is as near as dammit £1k.
That was the cost of Ken’s council tax increases for an average family.
Any quibbles?
No, he doesn’t. He just needs to get the left out.
@3 – That’s right, he’s planning to slash services for the poor again. That’s exactly the plan! Starving councils of even inflationary rises does just that.
@6 – Photocard eh? Oh wait, student or under 16. The actual cap is £4.20
Moreover, there is highly restricted availability (time limits) for the JC+ card, and the full bus fare was 90p not very long ago…
When was the bus fare 90p?
ukliberty – 2007
UK Liberty @ 13 Leon Wolfson @ 14
Leon’s memory (like Ken’s) is a bit selective.
Yes, the bus fare was reduced from £1 to 90p as a re-election gimmick, but the whole thing came unstuck when internal e-mails were leaked to the Standard showing that the plan was to put the fares back up after the votes were cast.
Pure Ken.
@15 – Ah yes, is that what you call facts. I answered a question.
You of course then have to paint this as evil. Typical right-wing behaviour.
“tap into Londoners’ expectations of the world’s capital.”
The world’s capital? Please.
2, Sorry you feel this way, Especially on How many Police Boris has cut from Outer london, I can’t fault what you say, Hopefully like Me you’ll vote for the Labour assembly members If Not the mayoral choice
5 true Ken should have apoloigsed in 2008 for not doing anything for outer london and spent the next 4 years campaigning there, Starting 4 months ago in outer london was 3 years too late.
Above all, Ken Livingstone has to stop making Nazi comparisons: http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/08/19/ken-livingstone-hitler/
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
To win London, Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone http://t.co/zj2emTTs
- sunny hundal
Me > 'If Ken Livingstone really wants to win London, he has to step outside his comfort zone' http://t.co/g8pTOwA4
- simon thomas dean
Me > 'If Ken Livingstone really wants to win London, he has to step outside his comfort zone' http://t.co/g8pTOwA4
- House Of Twits
RT @sunny_hundal Me > 'If Ken Livingstone really wants to win London, he has to step outside his comfort zone' http://t.co/pJplfiaP
- Alex Braithwaite
To win London, Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/UUtdZM9I via @libcon
- fabsternation
@sunny_hundal If Ken Livingstne wants 2win Ldn he has 2step outside his comfort zone http://t.co/X930LP7R >>He also needs 2tackle outer Ldn!
- leftlinks
Liberal Conspiracy – To win London, Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone http://t.co/odioeyf2
- DaveHill
Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/h7D1lwZ1 via @libcon #ken4london #backboris2012
- sunny hundal
Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/h7D1lwZ1 via @libcon #ken4london #backboris2012
- SpaceBon 3
Ken Livingstone has to step outside his comfort zone | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/h7D1lwZ1 via @libcon #ken4london #backboris2012
- Friday’s London Links
[...] Hundal at Liberal Conspiracy says Ken has to step out of his comfort [...]
- Benefits bust-ups, pre-budget posturing and toxic health reforms: political blog round up 21 -27 January | British Politics and Policy at LSE
[...] figures that show Boris Johnson has cut police, while Sunny Hundal at Liberal Conspiracy thinks Ken Livingstone needs more fresh ideas and energy to win the London mayoral [...]
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
» Laziness levels in Britain getting lazier, wails government
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 16 Comments 83 Comments 203 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » bluepillnation posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt » Hannah posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Lee Griffin posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Shatterface posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Hannah posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on 'Move Your Money' planned against RBS » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









