Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work


by Jon Cruddas MP    
January 24, 2012 at 10:45 am

In recent weeks, ‘responsible capitalism’ has risen to the top of the political agenda. A cross-party consensus has emerged that shareholders must do more to tackle irresponsible corporate behaviour such as excessive top pay.

We have also entered 2012, the year of auto-enrolment: a process that will ultimately see millions of workers begin saving for a pension through the capital markets. Thirdly, we have seen the government turning to pension funds as a source of capital to fuel the economic recovery through infrastructure investment.

Put all that together, and it is clear that the way pension funds invest is no longer, “a minority sport”, but a matter of acute national concern.

UK pension funds still make up around 13% of the UK stock market – with insurance companies who provide pension products making up another 12%. It’s vital that this huge pool of capital is invested responsibly in the long-term interests of pension savers.

Unfortunately, as a report published last year by responsible investment charity FairPensions showed, current interpretations of the law may hinder this objective.

Fiduciary duties – our main legal mechanism for protecting those who entrust their money to someone else – do not apply consistently across the pensions market.

Worse, they are generally interpreted as forbidding pension funds from raising their sights beyond quarterly returns. A view which, far from protecting savers’ long term interests, may in fact be damaging to them.

Clarification of this seemingly obscure and technical area of the law could unlock positive change in a whole range of areas – supporting jobs and growth, ensuring decent pensions, and underpinning the shift to a more responsible, resilient capitalism.

The pervasive myth that fiduciary duty begins and ends with maximising returns leads many funds to neglect intangible factors – be they excessive pay or poor environmental performance – even though they may well affect the long-term returns which matter most to pension savers.

Making companies more accountable to shareholders will not be enough to tackle ‘crony capitalism’: shareholders themselves must also become more accountable to the ordinary savers whose capital they invest.

Among other things, this means much greater transparency about what is being done with our money.

At the moment, if I want to find out how my pension fund voted on Barclays’ remuneration report, they are not obliged to tell me.

Given the choice, many pension savers might well want to see their savings invested in British industry or green infrastructure. But under conventional interpretations of the law, their views are irrelevant.

This is emphatically not about hijacking pension funds’ capital to serve government ends: that is a dangerous road to go down. It is about allowing them the discretion to take a broad and enlightened view of what is in their beneficiaries’ interests, rather than prescribing an approach which may ill serve savers in the long run.

The Pensions Regulator estimates that 5-8 million people will be newly saving or saving more as a result of the 2012 auto-enrolment reforms. Many of these will be low-paid workers. There is a huge responsibility on government to ensure that these people’s savings are responsibly stewarded and deliver a decent retirement income. This means ensuring that fiduciary standards of care are applied across the pensions market.

Strathclyde Pension Fund offer an excellent example of how pension funds can make investments that add genuine, sustainable economic value for their members. It recently announced a £100 million ‘New Opportunities Fund’ to invest in job creation in Glasgow, with the proviso that it will only invest in businesses which pay the Living Wage.

But these examples are very much the exception rather than the rule.


This is an extract from a speech last week by Jon Cruddas on pensions reform at the House of Commons.


---------------------------
     


About the author
This is a guest article. Jon Cruddas is MP for Dagenham, East London.
· Other posts by
Filed under
a) Section ,Blog ,Economy


25 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


“Fiduciary duties – our main legal mechanism for protecting those who entrust their money to someone else – do not apply consistently across the pensions market.”

This might have been from a speech, but now it’s written and published: citation needed.

Is an MP really saying this? My word…..

Firstly, pensioners can invest in SIPPs (self invested pensions), so if someone wants control of exactly what they invest in, they can already have it, at very low cost.

Secondly, pension funds DO already invest long term. Its total nonsense that they only invest for short term gain – most of them have very strict asset/liability matching criteria and weightings between asset types. They do have to make sure that the things they invest in are liquid enough to sell if they need to though – small scale illiquid assets are absolutely no use to a fund when their investors need some of their money back (and indeed, there are regulations to ensure this).

The other problem is not that pensions can’t invest in something if they really chose to. They DO have to maximise returns. Simply put, many of these investments in “British industry, green industry, local jobs” etc simply aren’t very good ones, whatever John Cruddas and co. would like to believe.

3. Leon Wolfeson

Oh yes, NEST.
A massive scam.

Where many of the people who “invest” will lose money. Moreover, it will lead to the closure of many of remaining employer schemes. A 1% employer contribution is pathetic.

More, it’s going to lead via misunderstandings to some poor people losing a significant chunk of income they need for food.

The world is being ******* up and we are investing in that.

Well worth a punt.

International Finance Yusury aka IFY

5. So Much For Subtlety

Strathclyde Pension Fund offer an excellent example of how pension funds can make investments that add genuine, sustainable economic value for their members. It recently announced a £100 million ‘New Opportunities Fund’ to invest in job creation in Glasgow, with the proviso that it will only invest in businesses which pay the Living Wage.

So basically a politician wants to loot our pension funds on behalf of his clients and his own political career?

Well colour me surprised. Who would have thought?

A politician is one who sets his policies for re,election a statesman sets his policies for future generations and a lord sits on his pile.
Good luck Strathclyde I hope you can clear these muddy waters that is uk politics.
Did you know iran is selling oil for gold……if usa catches

7. Just Visiting

Jon

have you any statistics on te fact that pension funds generate huge management fees 1.5% and more -every year – taken from our pension funds.

The cost if running a £10B pension fund can’t be much more than a £5B fund.
And the costs of running them must be dropping rapidly with online + internet mechanisms.

So paying 1.5% a year (many pensions have a lot higher costs) -that’s 50% of your pension gone over 30+ years


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/nDG8p87k

  2. DPWF

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/nDG8p87k

  3. DPWF

    Reform how pension funds work, and increase their transparency: a big step towards a more responsible capitalism. http://t.co/hwEUfWs4

  4. Patron Press - #P2

    #UK : Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/SfwDMz1T

  5. jean-louis oustric

    #UK : Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/SfwDMz1T

  6. Craig McVegas

    "@libcon: Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/fFB1K7jE" what is this shit? No no no #combatliberalism

  7. Cris Robertson

    #UK : Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/SfwDMz1T

  8. leftlinks

    Liberal Conspiracy – Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work http://t.co/z2ks6SPa

  9. sunny hundal

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work says Jon Cruddas MP – http://t.co/4ovaSQ29

  10. CheshireCabbieUK

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work says Jon Cruddas MP – http://t.co/4ovaSQ29

  11. Stephe Meloy

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work says Jon Cruddas MP – http://t.co/4ovaSQ29

  12. James Doran

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work says Jon Cruddas MP – http://t.co/4ovaSQ29

  13. Tom Powdrill

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work says Jon Cruddas MP – http://t.co/4ovaSQ29

  14. Stuart White

    Jon Cruddas on the need to reform and democratise the control of pension funds – spot on! http://t.co/HTB1yw1B via @libcon

  15. neilrfoster

    Jon Cruddas on the need to reform and democratise the control of pension funds – spot on! http://t.co/HTB1yw1B via @libcon

  16. Paul Beckford

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work says Jon Cruddas MP – http://t.co/4ovaSQ29

  17. Allan Siegel

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/jwsArnAx via @libcon

  18. Marwa Arafa

    Want a more responsible capitalism? Reform how pensions work | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/BH7YWi4n via @libcon





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



9 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



16 Comments



83 Comments



203 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Jamie posted on 'Move Your Money' planned against RBS

» pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Jim posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» JIm posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.

» pjt posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Oliver posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt