Published: November 21st 2011 - at 3:03 pm

Still doubt the government’s promise on the NHS is in tatters?


by Alice Hood    

Two stories published in the last few days should convince any remaining doubters that the Government’s promises to protect the NHS are in tatters. Cuts, growing waiting lists and the massive top-down reorganisation of the NHS are all taking their toll.

Research published by the Royal College of Nursing today finds that more than 56,000 NHS posts are set to be cut.

Half of these are clinical posts and one third of them are nursing roles.

Particularly worrying is the finding that the pace of cuts is increasing. There are also a number of associated trends of cutting hours and replacing experienced staff with cheaper workers at lower grades.

The second example is the u-turn on waiting lists. One of Andrew Lansley’s early decisions as Secretary of State for health was to relax the 18 week target for the maximum time between referral and treatment, as part of an overall move away from targets in the NHS.

But last week it emerged that almost a quarter of a million patients (9.4%) on waiting lists at any time go more than 18 weeks without treatment.

As UNISON pointed out in their response to the announcement, the cuts are an important underlying cause of growing waiting lists, and it does not seem that more resources will be made available to tackle the problem.

And of course, as all this goes on, the hugely damaging Health and Social Care Bill is still being debated in the House of Lords. Controversial votes on the role of the Secretary of State for Health and the autonomy of local providers have been postponed in order to avoid government rebellions.

One of the key issues still to be debated is the clause that would remove the cap on the amount of money hospital trusts can make from private patients. The TUC and unions across the health service fear that removing the cap would further increase waiting lists, as cash-strapped hospitals allow private patients to jump to the front of the queue for treatment.

Members of the House of Lords have also been calling on Andrew Lansley to publish the risk register for the Bill, which the Information Commissioner has instructed the Department of Health to publish.

Given the huge concerns about the dangers of the Bill that are uniting health workers , it is essential that the register is published to shed some light on the government’s own assessment of the risks.


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
Alice Hood is a TUC senior policy officer, working on public services and covering public service reform, health, local government, public service pensions and pay. She blogs more regularly at the Touchstone blog.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: Blog ,Health


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


Try the editorial in the British Medical Journal on 22 January 2011:

“What do you call a government that embarks on the biggest upheaval of the NHS in its 63 year history, at breakneck speed, while simultaneously trying to make unprecedented financial savings? The politically correct answer has got to be: mad.”
http://www.hospitaldr.co.uk/features/nhs-reform-too-soon-to-let-it-out-of-the-lab

“editorial in the British Medical Journal ”

I’m sure worstall will be along shortly to explain how the BMJ are just being economically illiterate, and there is nothing to worry about.

Indeed, and the sheer incompetence of Lansley is breathtaking.

In 2008 he formulated a plan which can be be described as “New Labour’s but nastier”. Key to this plan was that there would be lots of NHS money than could be handed over to the private sector. Then when events changed (money got scarce) Lansley adjusted bits, when a re-write was needed (for those who want to know, he came up with the evidence-less idea that management could be cut by a third, he should have concentrated on removing expensive outsourcing to the private sector and relying solely on value-for-money NHS providers).

Then when he got into Richmond House (on a lie and without a mandate, like the rest of this Tory government) the DH basically told him that he couldn’t do what he wanted to do, it would not work, would be too expensive and patients would suffer. That was when the idea of abolishing PCTs and SHAs was formulated – it was an off the top of the head solution to getting the management cut he had promised. (His original plan was “to prevent organisational upheaval we will retain SHAs/PCTs” we are now seeing the organisational upheaval that his policy had predicted in 2008).

The “liberation” that was promised in the White Paper has now been replaced with centralism. Whereas 80% of NHS money was spent by PCTs, now just 60% wioll be spent by CCGs the rest going to the new quango. Anyone remember Cameron promising he would cut quangos? Well, we have a Leviathan of a quango in the NHS Commissioning Board. GPs are not going to do commissioning. Instead it will be private companies who will decide which hospitals you will be allowed to use. Your GP will not be allowed to refer you to a local NHS hospital if the private sector company contracted to provide commissioning says that the hospital is not available. In fact, it is getting less likely that GPs will be able to refer now that Referral Management Centres are being set up, where untrained bureaucrats will override GPs decisions based on finance rather than medical need.

Over the last 18 months, bit-by-bit of his original plan has been mutilated so now the mess that is call the Health and Social Care Bill shows little resemblance to his pre-election plans. Lansley is truly the most incompetent minister in this government.

Typical cobblers from lefties.

Brown himself in his manifesto promised 20 billion savings in the NHS and promised increased pace of reform. Read it.

He did not promise to ring fence the NHS either. darlings budget promised ciuts in real terms.

And answer this – if Brown felt he could cut 20 billion from the NHS – why did he spend it in the first place?

@4: “Brown himself in his manifesto promised 20 billion savings in the NHS and promised increased pace of reform. Read it.”

The point of that editorial in the BMJ on 22 January 2011 was that is madness to demand savings of the NHS, in the order of £20bn, while simultaneously subjecting the NHS to a massive reorganisation, which the BMJ has estimated will cost from £2bn to £3bn:
http://www.bmj.com/content/341/bmj.c3843.full

A few days ago, the Telegraph reported:

Thousands left for a year on ‘hidden’ NHS waiting lists – Quarter of a million NHS patients are still waiting more than a year to be treated, ministers have admitted, as a new drive to force managers to tackle the ‘scandal’ was launched.

In October, the Telegraph reported:

Elderly patients condemned to early death by secret use of do not resuscitate orders
Elderly patients are being condemned to an early death by hospitals making secret use of “do not resuscitate” orders, an investigation has found – link available.

Readers of my earlier posts probably thought it was just a sick joke when I suggested a modest investment in a national network of Harold Shipman Centres could help Osborne to cut the budget deficit. Evidently, that investment is unnecessary. DNR orders work fine.

6. Arthur Seaton

Re: the NHS Bill; its not too late to stop it. If we get 100,000 signatures we can force the issue back to Parliament again, which will delay it again, and potentially cripple it.

If you oppose the government on this, take a moment to sign the petition below, and pass it on.

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/22670

@4 – Is THAT your current excuse for the doubling of NHS admin costs, to allow for private companies to syphon off profits. Can’t be spending on that “healthcare” thing, after all.

Also, funny you chose a word which is associated with a reputable trade, whereas your banker friends…

8. Arthur Seaton

There’s still time to stop the government’s health bill. If we get 100,000 on the government website Parliament will have to debate it again, a crucial delay which could still cripple it. Everyone should get behind this petition: take a minute to sign it and pass it on

http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/22670

Is this one of those ‘questions to which the answer is no’?


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. David Isaacs

    Still doubt the government’s promise on the NHS is in tatters?- Good blog by @Alice_Hood http://t.co/m881tLyg

  2. Alex Braithwaite

    This, by @Alice_hood, raises a question: why isn't Cameron questioned about his key election promise on NHS? http://t.co/OCpjCOUF

  3. fauxpaschick

    Still doubt the government’s promise on the NHS is in tatters?- Good blog by @Alice_Hood http://t.co/m881tLyg

  4. Molly

    Still doubt the government's promise on the NHS is in tatters? http://t.co/jRddbv7U

  5. Justin B

    Still doubt the government’s promise on the NHS is in tatters?- Good blog by @Alice_Hood http://t.co/m881tLyg

  6. Janet Graham

    This, by @Alice_hood, raises a question: why isn't Cameron questioned about his key election promise on NHS? http://t.co/OCpjCOUF

  7. Lynda Constable

    This, by @Alice_hood, raises a question: why isn't Cameron questioned about his key election promise on NHS? http://t.co/OCpjCOUF

  8. Larry Gardiner

    Still doubt the government’s promise on the NHS is in tatters? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/aK4Ho4rB

  9. Larry Gardiner

    Still doubt the government’s promise on the NHS is in tatters? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/mZxZpjQ5

  10. Martin

    This, by @Alice_hood, raises a question: why isn't Cameron questioned about his key election promise on NHS? http://t.co/OCpjCOUF





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think






48 Comments



93 Comments



24 Comments



57 Comments



10 Comments



26 Comments



24 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Chris Smith posted on BBC misrepresents gas story to help 'deniers'

» Just Visiting posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Trooper Thompson posted on UKIP higher than Libdems over May

» Trooper Thompson posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll

» Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Tim Worstallt posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll

» Just Visiting posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll | Liberal Conspiracy posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis

» Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Just Visiting posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Shinsei1967 posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Chaise Guevara posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right