Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different
contribution by Jonah Oliver
A key part of the Conservatives’ programme for government has been localism; the decentralisation of power from government institutions to ordinary people and communities.
Eric Pickles introduced the localism Bill by describing it as a “centrepiece of what this government is trying to do”, while David Cameron sees it as a fundamental part of his flagship Big Society project.
Not all Tories seem to share their vision however.
Last year Conservative controlled Norfolk County Council brought forward plans for a waste incinerator near the town of King’s Lynn. In common with similar projects around the country, many residents had concerns about the impact and suitability of such a scheme.
Naturally, the Borough Council of King’s Lynn and West Norfolk was also apprehensive and sceptical about the idea of an incinerator. They decided to put the proposals to the electorate through a referendum.
The postal ballot, held in February, was unambiguous in its verdict. Over 70,000 people turned out, 93% of them to vote “no” to the plan, in a demonstration of exactly the kind of localism that the government professes to support.
But far from reversing its position, the County Council approved the contract for an incinerator the very next month. Since then, ever greater local opposition has been building. The majority of parish councils, the Borough Council and several MPs form all parties have stated they are against it, as have 22 local doctors, Natural England and the Norfolk Wildlife Trust.
Even the announcement this week by Caroline Spelman, the Environment Secretary, that she didn’t believe there was sufficient evidence of a “broad consensus of support” to award crucial PFI credits for the scheme appears to have done little to change the County Council’s position.
In short, Norfolk County Council has not just ridden rough-shod over the wishes of its electors, but in so doing has vividly displayed the contempt many Tories show not only of localism, but of democracy.
At its first test localism looks set to come unstuck, not because of any inherent flaws, as many predicted, but due entirely to the hypocrisy of the party that formulated it in the first place.
—
Jonah Oliver blogs here.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
This is a guest post.
· Other posts by Guest
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Local Government
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Pretty much the same thing happened in mid Cornwall recently. Previous LD administration planned for an incinerator, Cornwall Council planning denied permission went to appeal. Approved against the wishes of the council by Pickles, for reasons of “regional& national significance.” But then when a composting plant was proposed in Pickles constituency he argued against it. See the local councillors blog here http://mebyonkernow.blogspot.com/2011/09/tory-ministers-guilty-of-breathtaking.html they have no interest in localism at all….
Even the announcement this week by Caroline Spelman, the Environment Secretary, that she didn’t believe there was sufficient evidence of a “broad consensus of support” to award crucial PFI credits for the scheme appears to have done little to change the County Council’s position.
So, the Government disagree with the County Council’s decision, but can’t overrule it? And this is an argument that this Government is hypocritical when it says it wants to devolve power?
TimJ: “And this is an argument that this Government is hypocritical when it says it wants to devolve power?”
No. it’s not. Read it again.
“Not all Tories seem to share their vision however.”
“due entirely to the hypocrisy of the party that formulated it in the first place”
@ 2 Tim J
“So, the Government disagree with the County Council’s decision, but can’t overrule it? And this is an argument that this Government is hypocritical when it says it wants to devolve power?”
The rhetoric around localism has always been about empowering people, not just councillors. If a local council can continue with a project in the face of widespread opposition from residents AND the disapproval of the government, then someone’s really not sticking to the spirit of the idea.
If a local council can continue with a project in the face of widespread opposition from residents AND the disapproval of the government, then someone’s really not sticking to the spirit of the idea.
Well, that depends doesn’t it? With planning matters in particular, I thought that the whole point was to strike a balance between localism and nimbyism. There’s been a bit of a fuss about it I seem to recall.
Tories hate anything they can’t either own or control. Therefore they hate power going up the chain to Europe. But equally they hate power going down the chain to Scotland, Wales and the English regions. For these divine right to govern hypcrites all power should reside with 300 odd tory home county MPS.
The one exception to this is their blind spot to the USA. In which case they are happy to give our sovereignty away in spades.
@ 5 Tim J
“Well, that depends doesn’t it? With planning matters in particular, I thought that the whole point was to strike a balance between localism and nimbyism. There’s been a bit of a fuss about it I seem to recall.”
I’m not saying that’s a bad idea (I get annoyed when a perfectly reasonable new build is blocked thanks to the “we hate change” brigade, which seems to consist mainly of people whose favourite activity is whinging), but it does seem to be at odds with the recent Tory rhetoric.
Personally, I’m happy for councils to operate like governments writ small: they ultimately make the decisions, and if the locals don’t like it they can kick them out at the next election.
And their support for localism does not extend to nuclear weapons. The majority
of Scottish people reject Trident which is based in their country.
But the Conservatives do not give a toss about that.
Oh come off it, what local community would ever vote for an incinerator? (Or similar other bad neighbour use – eg the landfill or large scale recycling/composting facility that would be needed if no incinerator.)
You might just about be able to make the case that an incinerator is not needed, but unless we stop households and businesses generating rubbish entirely, then something will need to be done with it.
Kings Lynn Borough (no doubt Tory also?) is just pulling a stunt, safe in the knowledge they can criticise without having the responsibility to find a solution. I’m sure they’d happily organise a referendum against the Water Board building a new sewage works, safe in the knowledge that they don’t have to dream up a way of stopping people ever having a shit.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Ian Woodland
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- David Stockdale
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Sue Jones
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Diane Hain
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Alex Braithwaite
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/lKdNejCv via @libcon
- Raymond Shemilt
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Alex Braithwaite
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Janet Graham
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/iYG8Mb0e
- Jamie
Tories talk about localism, but the reality is very different http://t.co/xblSUnSH #Cameron #Osborne #Conservatives
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
|
48 Comments 93 Comments 24 Comments 57 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 24 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Chris Smith posted on BBC misrepresents gas story to help 'deniers' » Just Visiting posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Trooper Thompson posted on UKIP higher than Libdems over May » Trooper Thompson posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Tim Worstallt posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Just Visiting posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll | Liberal Conspiracy posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Just Visiting posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Shinsei1967 posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Chaise Guevara posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right |










