Two weeks to speak up for human rights in the UK
I attended an event run by the British Institute of Human Rights today, encouraging the charity and voluntary sector to submit to the UK’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR) at the United Nations. Every country in the UN has its human rights record examined every four years, and the UK will be reviewed again in 2012.
The key message from the seminar was that the UPR process relies on the evidence submitted by NUGOs. However, during the last review in 2008 only 19 civil society organisations sent submissions to the Office for the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR). This seems incredibly low to me.
Crucially, the Universal Periodic Review has to base it’s report on the evidence submitted – it doesn’t go out looking for issues to examine on its own initiative. It is therefore essential that all those who campaign for any aspect of human rights in the UK, send their evidence into the OHCHR.
There are plenty of human rights abuses in the UK, many of which are reported here on Liberal Conspiracy: child poverty, human trafficking, child detention, and the unfair deportation of asylum seekers, to name but a few.
Surely the British charitable and voluntary sector can muster more than 19 submissions to the UPR, this time around.
Submissions are due by 21st November 2011. More information is available on the BIHR website.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Robert Sharp designed the Liberal Conspiracy site. He is the Campaigns Manager at English PEN, a blogger, and a director of digital design company Fifty Nine Productions. For more of this sort of thing, visit Rob's eponymous blog or follow him on Twitter @robertsharp59.
· Other posts by Robert Sharp
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Civil liberties
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Welfare Reforms, ATOs and the abuse of both Labour and the Tories forcing people back to work, no thought not.
Have I been placed under moderation because sod all of mine is being placed on here any more.
hello
How about these rights?
What? No fucking article you supposed liberals?
Cause not! Fucking Muslims again. No news here then….
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-15550350
“”"The offices of the French satirical magazine Charlie Hebdo in Paris have been destroyed in a petrol bomb attack.
It comes a day after the publication named the Prophet Muhammad as its “editor-in-chief” for its next issue.”"”
@4 -
“Mr Charbonnier, also known as Charb, said he did not see the attack on the magazine as the work of French Muslims, but of what he called “idiot extremists”.”
Great, thanks for proving you’re a bigot, though. And hey, an unjustifiable attack on the press? Well, the French should back off on unjustifiable laws against personal freedoms.
@1 – The database is acting funky. Comments can take up to an hour to appear. They are ALL appearing, though.
I suspect Dollar whore would even make the BNP blush
I am not intentionally being contrary, Robert. Being contrary to get a rise or a few laughs does not excite me.
@OP: “Surely the British charitable and voluntary sector can muster more than 19 submissions to the UPR, this time around.”
Or serious arguments about ambitions?
If you can’t present a serious argument, you should not be considered as a player in the game.
Muslims blow up a newspaper and yet the criticism on here is aimed at anyone but Muslims and anywhere but Islam!
If the EDL had blown up a newspaper office because of jokes about the English you hypocrites would need extra bandwidth to handle the flood of articles!!
@ Dollar whatever
Is the concept of reading an article before commenting on it completely beyond your mental capacity? I realise that you and people like Davey Boy (whoops! All the same troll!) think the internet is basically only there to allow you to express your hatred of Muslims on as many webpages as possible, but when you jump on a page that has nothing to do with the subject and immediately start ranting about Islamic extremists it does kinda make you look obsessive and, well, very fucking stupid.
@6 – Well, yes, sure – he missed off the “true perpetrators” behind it all from the rant.
(That’s the Jews, for reference)
Members of a branch of C18 were arrested on suspicious of making bombs about two years ago. This time it wasn’t true, but it most certainly has been in the past. There’s a European network of them working against the “Zionist Occupation Government”.
No, I’m not kidding. Incidentally, some of the Tories European allies in Poland have expressed sympathy for that idea, too. Conspiracy theorists…
Yes Leon criticising Muslims and Islam is really an attack on Jews!
You dumb fuck.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Just 2 Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK (by @robertsharp59) http://t.co/ocTLdQko
- robertsharp59
Hey @BIHRhumanrights, I hope this helps -> RT @libcon Just 2 Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK http://t.co/rZ5qkMzw
- English PEN
We'll report on #LibelReform & #UKvisas RT @libcon Just 2 Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights http://t.co/2Oo82xg3 by @robertsharp59
- LadyRoisin
RT @libcon: Just Two Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK http://t.co/35nHj87G
- Ian Williams
Just Two Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK http://t.co/iVw16gy9
- Gods & Monsters
Important human rights review needs evidence: http://t.co/Vj4Nx39p
- Janet Graham
Just 2 Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK (by @robertsharp59) http://t.co/ocTLdQko
- BIHR
Just 2 Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK (by @robertsharp59) http://t.co/ocTLdQko
- Ms C
RT: @libcon: Just 2 Weeks to Speak Up For Human Rights in the UK (by @robertsharp59) http://t.co/yQjX9l3f
- Stanislaw Derlatka
RT @libcon: Two weeks to speak up for human rights in the UK http://t.co/lARx2jxq
- human rights law
Two weeks to speak up for human rights in the UK:
http://t.co/QuCHYXN4 - Nivedita S
Two weeks to speak up for human rights in the UK:
http://t.co/QuCHYXN4 - pat elsmie
Two weeks to speak up for human rights in the UK:
http://t.co/QuCHYXN4
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
|
49 Comments 94 Comments 24 Comments 59 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 24 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Chaise Guevara posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Nathan Hulse posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » re posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Trooper Thompson posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Barrie J posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Chaise Guevara posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Chris Smith posted on BBC misrepresents gas story to help 'deniers' » Just Visiting posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Trooper Thompson posted on UKIP higher than Libdems over May » Trooper Thompson posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Tim Worstallt posted on Robin Hood tax: backed by the rich AND the rest, says new poll |










