Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm


by Sunny Hundal    
October 18, 2011 at 4:31 pm

Labour MP Diane Abbott has today written a letter to Health secretary Andrew Lansley asking whether there had been any ‘conflict of interest’ regarding his wife’s lobbying.

Abbott has repeatedly asked Lansley for his department to come clean on their meetings with Low Associates but have been rebuffed.

She said the issue was relevant in light of the circumstances around Dr Liam Fox’s resignation.

The letter asks:

I am urging the Department to clarify whether representatives from Low Associates, your wife’s lobbying firm, have been present in any meetings with departmental officials over the past year. All I am asking for is clarification.

She later adds:

Although I understand Low Associates keep their current clients private, it has been noted that associates in the organisation have in the past worked with food multi-nationals like Mars and General Foods and drinks companies like Seagrams.

In light of Liam Fox’s revelations, this is even more important now. Time for Lansley to come clean.

Diane Abbott to Andrew Lansley


---------------------------
     


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


39 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


CBE! For services rendered to the private health industry? For plumbing the depths of deceit? For giving David Cameron work experience? For having thick hair? For washing his hands before entering a ward? And rolling up his sleeves? For learning how to control his grumpiness? For Chrissakes…

Maybe she should send a similar letter to Ed Milliband as well?

The Labour government weakened the rules on lobbying transparency. The ministerial code published in 2007 dropped the requirement that meetings between ministers and lobbyists should be recorded. It also rebuffed MPs’ demands for a register of lobbyists. You’ll be surprised to hear who the villain was: Tom Watson, then a Cabinet Office minister, now a heroic campaigner for corporate accountability. He brushed aside the call for a register with the claim that “we have a pretty good system in the UK”. In fact, we have no system at all: the Commons public administration committee has pointed out that “Lobbying activity in the United Kingdom is subject to no specific external regulation.”

From the Guardian of all places….

On their website, Low Associates (a marketing & PR firm) clearly state:

We do not lobby government (i.e. seek to influence or amend legislation or policy) on behalf of our clients. Neither is it appropriate for us to handle any client with interests in the health sector.

Unless you have any reason to believe they are lying, this looks like just another smear job.

On their website, Low Associates clearly state:

We do not lobby government (i.e. seek to influence or amend legislation or policy) on behalf of our clients. Neither is it appropriate for us to handle any client with interests in the health sector.

Have you any good reason to disbelieve this? Or is this just another cheap smear job?

Tyler there is a difference between weakening the rules and deliberatley flouting them?

Flowerpower Adam Werrity had “special advisor” on his business cards? Was he lying? mmmm!!

Flowerpower Adama Werrity had “special advisor” on his business cards. Was he lying with the full knowledge of a government minister? mmmm!!

@ 8

No he didn’t have “special adviser” on his card. That would have been untrue.

He just had “adviser” (in fact, “advisor) – which was true.

Flowerpower, excuse me while I pick up some of the straw that fell out of your man there? The fact remains that Werrity was passing himself off as an official adviser to Fox with his full knowledge. Lies ad deceit at the heart of a Tory government who would have guessed it eh??

11. mary lockhart

# Flowerpower,”We do not lobby government (i.e. seek to influence or amend legislation or policy) on behalf of our clients. Neither is it appropriate for us to handle any client with interests in the health sector”.

Many Lobbyists do not seek to influence or amend legislation on behalf of their clients. They seek to set its direction, or to have it drafted in the first place. Nor do they lobby governments. They lobby, or seek to influence, MP’s, who may, or may not, then influence Ministers. As to whether or not a lobbying firm considers it appropriate to “handle” clients with an interest in the health sector – handling and representing are not the same things, and clents such as Mars may not have a direct interest in the health sector, but the health sector and govenrment policy most certainly do impact on their trading activities

@ 11

So what?

What is it that you are arguing exactly?

Is it that you are alleging that this company are secretly lobbyists, while claiming not to be?

Are you arguing that they do have clients in the health sector, while claiming not to?

What evidence do you have for either of these?

There is no law against being a lobbtyst, and no law saying a consultancy cannot work in the Health sector.

This outfit has CHOSEN not to do either – largely, I suspect, because the CEO is married to a minister.

So she’s keeping well off her husband’s patch.

What MORE do you expect her to do? Stay at home and hoover the landing (again)?


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Dr anonymous

    First Fox now LaLa http://t.co/xsHtzdrP his wife works for a lobbying firm with health interests and who paid for his office in oppo?

  2. Citizen K

    Why won't Lansley come clean on whether Dept of Health officials have met wife's lobbying firm? http://t.co/cWd9zYOW

  3. Laurie Tomlinson

    Diane Abbott again asks Andrew Lansley over wife's lobbying in light of #LiamFox resignation http://t.co/XeBLteAp via @sunny_hundal #nhs

  4. Abbott4leader

    http://t.co/5cJeV3W4 RT @WLancsGP2011First Fox now LaLa http://t.co/vdvcdG5w his wife works for a lobbying firm with health interests a…

  5. Julie Wintrup

    Diane Abbott again asks Andrew Lansley over wife's lobbying in light of #LiamFox resignation http://t.co/XeBLteAp via @sunny_hundal #nhs

  6. Staffordshire UNISON

    RT @sunny_hundal: Why won't Lansley come clean on whether Dept of Health officials have met wife's lobbying firm? http://t.co/mZ7wdvbN

  7. Henry Scowcroft

    And up next… http://t.co/YthHyZCh

  8. Abbott4leader

    http://t.co/5cJeV3W4 RT @oh_henry2011And up next… http://t.co/Z50Uke2c

  9. Adrian Parry

    http://t.co/7rZvh3kf Lansley queried over wife's dealings. I'm getting thoroughly peeved by stories of Tory 1% looking after one another.

  10. Paul Rooke

    Lead Story: (UsuallyButNotAlwaysMyViews) Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm… http://t.co/YVXwfSPc, see more http://t.co/7A0j8n8m

  11. Lescromps

    Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/U5VMPg98 #UKuncut

  12. Abbott4leader

    http://t.co/5cJeV3W4 RT @Lescromps2011Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/789spQD5 #UKuncut

  13. Jamie Hewitt

    Liberal Conspiracy says Diane Abbott MP has challenged Health Sec about wife’s lobbying firm: http://t.co/SvC15oVI #publicaffairs #lobbying

  14. CllrSarahMcStravick

    Liberal Conspiracy says Diane Abbott MP has challenged Health Sec about wife’s lobbying firm: http://t.co/SvC15oVI #publicaffairs #lobbying

  15. David Davies

    Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/VjVzafhM

  16. Abbott4leader

    http://t.co/5cJeV3W4 RT @acute_tomato2011Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/CailuyIr

  17. Karen Webb

    Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/VjVzafhM

  18. Dawn Stewart

    Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/VjVzafhM

  19. fungwahman

    Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/VjVzafhM

  20. Abbott4leader

    http://t.co/5cJeV3W4 RT @e1ucidate2011RT @acute_tomato: Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/CailuyIr

  21. Abbott4leader

    http://t.co/5cJeV3W4 RT @fungwahman2011RT @acute_tomato: Abbott attacks Lansley on wife’s lobbying firm ~ http://t.co/CailuyIr

  22. sunny hundal

    Apologising for trade union funding turns it into a bigger controversy. They shd ask Andrew Lansley to come clean first http://t.co/cWd9zYOW

  23. MerseyMal

    Apologising for trade union funding turns it into a bigger controversy. They shd ask Andrew Lansley to come clean first http://t.co/cWd9zYOW

  24. sunny hundal

    @mrharrycole yeah? Well why haven't you said anything about Lansley not coming clean about this then? http://t.co/cWd9zYOW

  25. jackie neylon

    Apologising for trade union funding turns it into a bigger controversy. They shd ask Andrew Lansley to come clean first http://t.co/cWd9zYOW

  26. Owen Blacker

    Apologising for trade union funding turns it into a bigger controversy. They shd ask Andrew Lansley to come clean first http://t.co/cWd9zYOW

  27. Alex Harrowell

    Apologising for trade union funding turns it into a bigger controversy. They shd ask Andrew Lansley to come clean first http://t.co/cWd9zYOW





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



17 Comments



83 Comments



204 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Paul posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve

» Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Cylux posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Watchman posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve

» Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation