Tories uneasy at Cam’s dismissal of women
Remember when right-wingers laughed off accusations of sexism by Labour MPs when George Osborne said “calm down dear” to Angela Eagle MP?
At the time, lefties were accused of being excessively politically correct. But that sentiment seems to vanish when its one of their own.
Today at PMQs, Cameron called Nadine Dorries “frustrated” after she asked: “Isn’t it about time he told the Deputy Prime Minister who is the boss?”
Watch the exchange below
Paul Goodman at ConservativeHome wrote:
The Prime Minister may not have meant to put her down by first saying that he knows she’s “frustrated”, and then giving up his answer after laughter from MPs, but that was the effect. It was somehow displeasing.
James Forsyth at the Spectator CoffeeHouse:
Cameron replied ‘I know the honourable lady is extremely frustrated’ at which the House descended into puerile laughter. The double entendre appeared unintentional, Cameron seemed slightly taken aback by the House’s reaction at first, but having made it he should have tried to respectfully answer her question rather than just sitting down.
And a Tory MP told the Guardian’s Nicholas Watt:
The prime minister’s behaviour was despicable. It was the worst of the Bullingdon. It was a total demolition of Nadine Dorries on a personal basis. The prime minister made no effort to engage in the argument. It is deeply unpleasant. But then that is no surprise. Just look at George Osborne’s face when the prime minister told a female Labour MP to ‘calm down dear’. His faced creased with laughter. They just think it is all a joke.
Those are all good points, and the Prime Minister should have answered the question rather than trying to just embarrass her.
But can Tories really expect proper standards when they laugh off such behaviour when it comes to Labour women? To be fair to James Forsyth he did say Cameron’s calm down dear remark was “certainly ill-judged”. Many others however felt it was fine.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
25 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Oh so now you’re on her side!
Er, surely it was Cam who said “calm down dear” to Angela Eagle?
And your point (should be) that’s he’s becoming a serial offender?
Don’t do this. There is nothing whatsoever good about having this woman in politics.
Much as I despise Nadine Dorres and everything she stands for, there was no excuse for Cameron’s behaviour. She remains a duly elected MP and has the same rights as any other member. If the PM can just laugh off a stupid PMQ, he can laugh off a sensible one.
Come on people, it was a throw away line from Cameron. You cannot blame Cameron because the back benches cackle like schoolboys. Cameron does plently of other things that we SHOULD be highlighting, but use of the word ‘frustrated’ is not one of them.
What Jim says above. It doesn’t sound as if the remark was meant to be in any way offensive, and it’s not Cameron’s fault if more childish members of the house interpreted it in a way he didn’t intend. I certainly don’t see how you get from “Cameron describes a female MP as ‘frustrated’, probably accurately” to “Cameron dismisses women”.
Puerile laughter is business as usual for the HoC. Cameron does enough things in real life that need to be opposed, there’s no need to invent stuff.
Im sorry but I dont know see the hidden meaning, can someone enlighten me?
Even if the woman is as mad as a box of frogs, and indeed Satan’s representative on earth, Dave Gimmick was bang out of order. I miss having a grown up as PM.
Yes, he’s now a serial offender. I also think it comes across as though Cameron didn’t immediately mean it, but he then reinforced the ‘joke’ rather than being respectful. Nadine Dorries’ politics may be vile, but that doesn’t mean that it’s a free for all, and the usual rules like “sexism is bad” fall away.
@Richard and Chris – this is about the fact that the PM shouldn’t be using puerile sexist remarks as a way to deflate female MPs, whatever the substance (or lack thereof) of their comments.
@Dave it think the hidden meaning is kind of like when school boys laugh at the word boobies..or bum. So frustrated as in sexually but even cam the sham was a little take aback by the comment… He allowed his piers to laugh him down he must have thought hed been offensive and sat down in order to not embarrass himself i think his brain rebooted at that moment which shut down his mouth by default
@ 10
Exactly. He hadn’t meant it to be taken that way, he was obviously surprised that it was, and he seemed to sit down because he didn’t want to be involved in that nonsense.
Sunny, you’re making me defend David Cameron. Please stop it.
Interesting to see all the comments here are made by men? Cameron should have been aware at the response of his comments and corrected them immediately but to be fair the response of the house is typical of the sexism that pervades politics in general.
Amazing We get to comment 13 without anyone pointing out that Nadine Dorries appeared on Newsnight to say Cameron had rung her to say he hadn’t meant it to come out as it dis and that she totally accepted his explanation and expression of regret.
Bit of a problem with the truth, have we?
@10 – Thanks, Still dont really get whats so funny about it but must be what circles you roll in.
@12 – Interesting to see all the comments here are made by men?
Is this a question or a statement, if a question the answer is no, if a statement I’d like to know whats interesting about it?
Yes, I thought it was a nasty moment, but those suggesting the sexism came from the oafish backbenchers and not actually Cameron himself are probably right. Though this is hardly comforting.
Bit disappointed that people at the start of these comments can’t distinguish between legitimate criticism of a completely deluded and dishonest MP, and puerile sex-based insults.
The former makes an essential contribution to the quality of Parliamentary debate; the latter does quite the opposite and is thus harmful well beyond the embarrassment it causes one person.
“Amazing We get to comment 13 without anyone pointing out that Nadine Dorries appeared on Newsnight to say Cameron had rung her to say he hadn’t meant it to come out as it dis and that she totally accepted his explanation and expression of regret.”
Ha Ha Ha
You really are a party warrior, Flowerpotman
He did mean it as it came out and our Nadine has had a call from a spin doctor, for damage limitation purposes.
Personally the whole issue is nonsense. Politics is a tough profession. Some of these women need to develop tougher skins
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/2C4f4i4
- Jonathan Davis
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/2C4f4i4
- Shelley Angelie
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/2C4f4i4
- Matthew S. Dent
But were strangely unconcerned at "Calm down, dear"… RT @libcon Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/0qTnjN9
- Panda
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/2C4f4i4
- Mark Charan Newton
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron’s dismissal of women http://t.co/IBSpFgS
- paulstpancras
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/2C4f4i4
- Holly Dustin
Right-wingers uneasy at Cameron's dismissal of women http://t.co/2C4f4i4
- sunny hundal
@johnmcternan indeed http://t.co/RJ1YhIp
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Cylux posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









