The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed
contribution by Jamie Thunder
On June 29 this year John Brennan, President Obama’s chief counter-terrorism advisor, said in a speech at John Hopkins University that there ‘hasn’t been a single collateral death’ in the past year from the USA’s use of unmanned drones in Pakistan.
This echoed earlier assurances from unnamed US and Pakistani officials, who claimed some militants had been allowed to escape rather than risk civilians being killed.
But research by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism published yesterday shows that claims no civilians have been killed are wrong.

It found that since a drone strike in August 2010 that supposedly changed the CIA’s policy towards the technique, at least 45 civilians, including six children, had been killed in ten separate attacks. It also identified 15 further strikes since August 2010 in which civilians might have been killed.
Drone strikes in Pakistan now occur at a rate of one every four days, mostly around the tribal border regions of North and South Waziristan.
On August 23 2010, around 20 people were killed in a strike on Danda Darpakhel in North Waziristan. The town was targeted because of its links with the Haqqani Network, but at least four civilians were killed when the drone fired on their house. Shortly after this it was announced that drones would only be used when civilian casualities could be avoided, but the Bureau’s analysis shows that people unconnected to terrorism are still being killed.
Although publicly Pakistan’s government has condemned the drone attacks, in diplomatic cables released by Wikileaks its leaders seemed to endorse the strikes.
The stories
US claims of ‘no civilian deaths’ in Pakistan drone strikes is untrue
Drone strikes rise to one every four days
The CIA drone strike that rewrote the rules
‘Precision is relative’ – an interview with Professor Anatol Lieven
Get the data: Twenty-five deadly strikes
—-
Jamie blogs at The Thunderer and is on Twitter
---------------------------
| Tweet |
This is a guest post.
· Other posts by Guest
Filed under
Blog ,Foreign affairs ,South Asia ,United States
11 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
These new bomb cehck before they explode if anyone is innocent they have this gadet which even checks pasports.
Bomb away and you can direct it, sadly it cannot tell whom is inside the building
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed http://bit.ly/nf5sIK
- richard laing
The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed http://bit.ly/nf5sIK
- Clint David Samuel
The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed http://bit.ly/nf5sIK
- Pakistan
The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed: Source: liberalconspiracy.org — Wednesday, July 20, … http://bit.ly/omOO3L
- David Pegg
.@libcon now running our #drones story as its splash: http://t.co/RJRVaWm – cheers @sunny_hundal! #covertwar
- Alice Ross
More coverage for @tbij's #drones story: podcast and article on @salon http://t.co/cBDEuSp and by @jdthndr on @libcon http://t.co/B1Y6MIP
- Paulo Coimbra
The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed http://flpbd.it/8xb9
- Paulo Querido
RT @x_coimbra: The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed http://flpbd.it/8xb9
- Newsnight covers Bureau’s drone investigation: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
[...] Drone Wars UK also picked up on the story, and an analysis by the Bureau’s Jamie Thunder was also featured on the website liberalconspiracy.org [...]
- dothakers
The full extent of US drone attacks in Pakistan revealed http://goo.gl/fb/Nv6Zg
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve |









