Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate?


by Guest    
July 19, 2011 at 9:30 am

contribution by Andy May

Rupert Murdoch’s media empire is falling apart at the seams, but we are at grave risk of missing the big picture here.

It is excellent news that the illegal activities at the News of the World and subsequent cover-up are finally being properly investigated but it is also abundantly clear they did not happen in isolation. Any journalist who worked in those years will tell you that other powerful press barons were up to their neck in it.

So who are the other culprits when it comes to illegal activity – could the Daily Mail be next?

The taped conversations between Paul McMullan and Hugh Grant that lifted the News of the World scandal also contained a throwaway comment on phone hacking and illegal data gathering.

In his McMullan’s own words: “When I went freelance in 2004 the biggest payers – you’d have thought it would be the NoW, but actually it was the Daily Mail…”

Meanwhile a 2006 Information Commissioners Office report identifies 952 illegal data transactions traceable to Daily Mail Journalists – four times that of the News of the World during the same period.

To add insult to injury, during this time the current editor of the Daily Mail was also Chair of the Committee that oversees the Press Complaints Commission Code of Practice [title fixed] – the same regulatory body supposed to hold newspapers to account. He spent his time championing self regulation and railing against media regulation whilst the industry was rife with phone hacking and illegal data gathering.

I contacted the Metropolitan press office to find out if they were investigating other newspapers such as the Mail. I was told by a press officer record that; “It would seem highly unlikely that only one news organisation was involved in this scale of hacking alone”.

Yet from my conversation it appears the police investigation has thus far failed to investigate any other sources than Mulcaire’s original file of News of the World phone hacking victims. Something that Sue Akers the lead police officer on the investigation should quickly clarify.

The Department of Culture Media and Sport should order the Police to broaden their investigation to the Daily Mail and other big offenders listed in the ICO report. Removing Murdoch’s grip on our country won’t address the wider abuses to public privacy other owners and editors of our newspapers have allowed.


---------------------------
     


About the author
This is a guest post.
· Other posts by
Filed under
Blog ,Media


85 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


1. James Baker

Yes they should do, but also other papers were at it such as the Observer where the ICO had identified 103 instances of illegal transactions. They should also examine why the government of the day failed to act on the ICO’s report when it landed in their in-boxes.

I understand the Mirror is also up to it’s neck in this. The investigation should be about illegal hacking and not be used to to try to censor views you don’t like. That’s akin to accepting hacking unless it’s done by “the right wing”.

3. Flowerpower

@ 2

Two of those NI staff who have already been interviewed under caution had moved across to the NoW from Mirror Group.

It is theoretically possible that that’s where the (mal)practice began.

@James, JC – totally agree, I picked the Mail as top of the list of others to investigate because of the shreds of evidence already out there and because of Paul Dacres very prominent role as a champion of self regulation. There are plenty more that could be add to the list.

Absolutely, I’ve written to my MP today for assurances he’ll push for the investigation to be fuller than just news International.

The Guardian was printing stolen computer data – investigate them as well – or should only the papers on the political right be investigated?

7. Paul Newman

As I thought…… Polly Toynbee started off on this last w/e. In reaction to that and having noticed a post on this blog asking for control of the Press I wrote to the local Paper thusly ….

I should explain they are very into Tom Paine around here ….(not that anyone cares what I think obviously )

“If Lewes stands for anything it should be standing up for the Daily Mail.The Guardian and its tribe are having an orgy of self congratulation at their defeat of Murdoch. The prominence of local left wing campaigner Nick Davies gives us a special interest
OK,they broke the law but they were not alone. In “What Price Privacy Now“, the information Commissioners reports on a ubiquitous trade in illegally obtained information. In the league table of offenders the Mirror is prominent. The News of The World was better than many.
Is it , in any case, a simple issue? Many MPs of ,still sore about expenses, are delighted to shut that window on the truth. Nixon would have liked a bit less pilfering and while there is a debate to be had I question whether a howling mob, justifiably enraged by the sick making treatment of the Dowler family, have much to add to it .

Lets not waste sympathy on the digger. His acolytes colluded in the corrupt relationship between the political power brokers and the media through the Blair and Brown period. Parliament was replaced by a media obsessed entourage of self delighted courtiers like Alistair Campbell. An end to that would be welcome and Cameron seems to be gasping the opportunity

On the other hand Polly Toynbee wants to neuter the Mail with some sort of supercharged PCC and who knows what Fascist legislation .Liberal Conspiracy the top leftwing blog , carried a post recommending we enforce political ”neutrality” on the printed media. In whose opinion? The same people that entrusted Polly Toynbee with editorship of social affairs at the BBC no doubt .
I fear an unholy alliance of would-be troughers, corrupt elitists, and freedom hating socialists turning the blood lust on all their enemies. Danger, Will Robinson; danger !

That’s why Lewesians of all shades of opinion must defend the Mail. Put it this way “He that would make his own liberty secure, must guard even his enemy from opposition; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that will reach himself” (Tom Paine .)

Hoo ha …. and as we know Lewes ( A weeny little place in Sussex) is the fulcrum of the political universe . I must say I was gratified to see some Liberal left opinion on this site getting nervous about this clamp down and mob hysteria …I hope such voices will prevail over the Fascist left ( step forward jack booted Andy may and receive your medal)

@Paul Newman – there is delicious irony in you – a defender of the Daily Mail – accusing me of facism ;-p Lord Rothermere would be proud.

If the Daily Mail doesn’t have anything to hide surely it would welcome a broader police investigation – along with the Mirror and other tabloid newspapers.

Sorry for being a pedant but Paul Dacre is not Chairman of the PCC and never has been. He’s Chair of the Editors’ Code Committee, which oversees the Code of Practice.

“The Guardian was printing stolen computer data – investigate them as well – or should only the papers on the political right be investigated?”

Is the Mirror on the right?

look at the little righties out there, getting all irate cause Murdoch is getting a beating…. ‘What if Guardian did this, what if the Mirror did that, what if the Indy done this’…yeah what if, but what we do know is what the right wing Murdoch press have done. Admit it, your boys have taken one helluva beaten.

It does seem that a number of different issues have been conflated in the same furore.

1) News International is and was too big and too powerful.
2) Most journalists and editors are not overly concerned about privacy laws and were prepared to pay for stories in a competitive environment.
3) Politicians will do anything to get elected and will even go to the weddings and parties of people they hate.
4) The Metropolitan police force is institutionally corrupt and run by poor calibre individuals.
5) NOTW were unlucky to be the ones caught with their ears to the voicemail- others have probably done as bad or worse.
6) The British public are not much concerned about privacy rights except for those of dead teenagers.

We have been allowed a glimpse of the sewer. Now who wants to put their hands in?

13. Charles Wheeler

At every stage in this process the authorities have had to be pushed into investigating each aspect, with firewalls being constructed around ‘lone’ hackers, ‘lone’ executives, and now small groups of executives, policemen, and so on. Each time one firewall collapses a new one is constructed. At the moment we have one around News International – but it seems difficult to believe that it was the only news organisation hiring freelance crooks. Nothing is going to be volunteered.

it seems difficult to believe that it was the only news organisation hiring freelance crooks

It wasn’t. See page 9 of What Price Privacy Now? linked to in the OP.

@6 Technically speaking the Telegraph was printing stolen computer data when it exposed the expenses scandal, it’s up to you if you really want to pursue this path of false equivalence further.

16. Mike Killingworth

There is of course the possibility that this afternoon Murdoch will claim “we only did it because we found out that the others were at it”. What’s he got to lose?

Try looking at this chart from Guido Fauwkes blog, before we all get carried away with ourselves:

http://order-order.com/2011/07/16/we-are-on-the-verge-of-killing-popular-journalism/

The Mirror up in the lead of blaggers – quite a way in front of The Mail – and way way in front of News International.

So it doesn’t look like all naughty practices went over the side with Captain Bob.

But why let that get in the way of the mob?

It seems the true meaning of public interest is yet again being ignored by the righty apologists.

Exposure of government complicity in torture through stolen computer files is in the public interest. Hacking Millie Dowler’s mobile isn’t.

19. wibble wibble

Yes, as far as I can see from the published stats they were all at it, the mirror group being the pack leaders. Go for all of them, their connections in the police forces of GB and UK and the politicians who turned a blind eye or courted them.

20. Leon Wolfson

@17 – That’d be unfortunate. But..so be it. No democracy can afford to ignore this sort of thing.

Besides, bluntly, there are those of us who have the talents to work in part of the field, and who currently are not, who would flock to the banner of a new news group. It’s not rocket science, it’s sociology, and there are plenty of hungry young faces out there.

To all the right wingers salivating over the idea of the Guardian/Observer being dragged into the mud too, allowing the “pot, kettle, black” defence to be deployed… well, do you *really* think they’d have kept pushing the story in the face of ridicule for years if they thought they were also guilty?

I may have a rose-tinted view of the Guardian, but I’m fairly confident they’re not that altruistic that they’d spend years blasting away at an investigation which might land their own management in jail.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  2. Richard Murphy

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  3. A Sanguinarius

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  4. Hammy Cammy

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  5. Sarah Graham

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  6. Don Harrison

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  7. richut

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  8. Jill Hayward

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  9. Swamp Thang

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  10. Greg Eden

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  11. Andy May

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/t5LSuaB

  12. jude

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  13. Vegan Panda

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/t5LSuaB

  14. manishta sunnia

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  15. Feistahuer Yvonne

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  16. Mabel Horrocks

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  17. Pucci Dellanno

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  18. Ros Kayes

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/t5LSuaB

  19. Bill Kruse

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/rmq6SCz via @libcon

  20. Walton Pantland

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  21. richard peppiatt

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  22. Amanda Kendal

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  23. mushroom77

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/QsnXFgk via @libcon

  24. Daily Mail Watch

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/rmq6SCz via @libcon

  25. David McMillan

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/vOxwl8R via @libcon

  26. Alfred Camp

    “@libcon: Shouldn't police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate?" http://t.co/MYe21Yt ~ When on safari take one beast at a time!

  27. Kevin Arscott

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  28. Paul Crowley

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  29. Vitzliputzli

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  30. Paul Francis

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  31. Louise Houston

    Yes yes YES RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  32. Mark Butler

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  33. davidgerard

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  34. CAROLE JONES

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/k63Sj3p via @libcon

  35. Caspar 01

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI Yes, and now, not later

  36. Claire

    PLEASE… take the Daily Mail down too!! @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/5cBtwNL

  37. nobby-Lobby

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  38. James Ewart

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/B2SFyJi via @libcon

  39. Cathy

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  40. Peter Thornton

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/XyWtEIS

  41. Nick Dixon

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  42. Kate Horan

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  43. DPWF

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  44. John Didlock

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  45. Steve Trow

    “@libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/cxUdpPl” < yes!

  46. Murray Christison

    Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  47. Spir.Sotiropoulou

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/BEzNsqG via @libcon

  48. Alan Toms

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/rmq6SCz via @libcon

  49. MUSHKUSH

    RT @libcon: Shouldn't the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://bit.ly/oy1sEI

  50. James Grindrod

    Why stop with News of the World? Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/yUWr9b1

  51. Andy May

    @wossy would you be interested in supporting calls to have a wider police investigation of private investigators? http://t.co/xsWHQrS

  52. Eamon Walsh

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/jq7RnD7 via @libcon

  53. The Daily Quail

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/mAn8B1u via @libcon

  54. Chris Huang-Leaver

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/mAn8B1u via @libcon

  55. Chris Huang-Leaver

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/k9T8Rat via @libcon

  56. Dick Mandrake

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/LL5hVP2 (by @libcon, via @DailyQuail)

  57. Dick Mandrake

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? http://t.co/LL5hVP2 (by @libcon, via @DailyQuail)

  58. Jon

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/mAn8B1u via @libcon

  59. Anna Sharman

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/k9T8Rat via @libcon

  60. Paul Whitehead

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/mAn8B1u via @libcon

  61. Greg Eden

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/mAn8B1u via @libcon

  62. The Sweet Nothings

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/cLTJ9fo via @libcon

  63. William

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/cLTJ9fo via @libcon

  64. Christine Armstrong

    Shouldn’t the police also investigate the Daily Mail over #hackgate? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/20f7vrC via @libcon





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



17 Comments



83 Comments



204 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?