Published: July 15th 2011 - at 12:11 am

Why the FBI probe is unlikely to hurt Murdoch


by Sunny Hundal    

I said yesterday morning at least one Republican Representative (that number has now grown) and one Democrat Senator were demanding an FBI investigation into claims the News of the World hacked into phones of 9/11 victims.

Now, the NY Times reports:

In response to requests from members of Congress and to at least one news report, the Federal Bureau of Investigation in New York opened a preliminary inquiry on Thursday into allegations that News Corporation journalists sought to gain access to the phone records of victims of the Sept. 11 attacks, according to several people briefed on the matter.

The investigation is in its earliest stages, two of the people said, and its scope is not yet clear. It also is unclear whether the F.B.I. has identified possible targets of the investigation or possible specific criminal violations.

The bureau is “taking a hard look at it from a couple of angles,” one of the people said. The person said the matter was being treated as an assessment, a term the bureau uses to characterize the early stages of an investigation that precede the possible issuance of subpoenas or the use of other investigative tools like wiretaps.

The story comes from one Daily Mirror report, with no follow-up from the tabloid itself or even the Guardian.

So its likely the FBI will first look into whether the claims stands up. They will have to quickly comb through the 4,000 or so phone-hacking victims and ascertain whether 9/11 victims were among them.

I spoke to one source at the Daily Mirror tonight last night who said the newspaper would not have run the story if it did not stand up.

Here’s the problem – it’s not clear whether phones of 9/11 victims were actually hacked.

The original Daily Mirror story says:

The pair chatted behind closed doors as a former New York cop made the 9/11 hacking claim. He alleged he was contacted by News of the World journalists who said they would pay him to retrieve the private phone records of the dead.

Now working as a private ­investigator, the ex-officer claimed reporters wanted the victim’s phone numbers and details of the calls they had made and received in the days leading up to the atrocity.

A source said: “This investigator is used by a lot of journalists in America and he recently told me that he was asked to hack into the 9/11 victims’ private phone data. He said that the journalists asked him to access records showing the calls that had been made to and from the mobile phones belonging to the victims and their ­relatives.

“His presumption was that they wanted the information so they could hack into the ­relevant voicemails, just like it has been shown they have done in the UK. The PI said he had to turn the job down. He knew how insensitive such research would be, and how bad it would look.

Because of the wording, it is equally likely that 9/11 victims may not have been hacked. That is now for the FBI to determine.

Notably though, the Daily Mirror report does not find specific evidence but reports someone was asked to do so and turned it down. It’s not a watertight case in other words.

The bigger worry for Murdoch – I think – is that the SEC opens an investigation into whether News Corporation indulged in corruption and bribery.

That is what several Democratic Senators have also called for and I think that line of inquiry would have more legs.

Update:
The respected Columbia Journalism Review also pours cold water over the Daily Mirror story and says its unlikely to lead anywhere. “A piece that triggers an FBI probe reports no actual hacking and its information is third-hand.”

The story will generate some outraged headlines in the US but I suspect it won’t lead anywhere, especially since it all allegedly happened so long ago.


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


I think that the FBI has now opened an investigation may mean a few whistleblowers may appear, one can hope anyway

2. blackwillow1

I really should go to bed, (school run in the a.m) but this latest development has a lot of potential for generating some lively debate. Wether or not they actually got hold of any data from 9/11, if the ex-cop is telling the truth, isnt the act of attempting to do it just as bad?

For an SEC investigation to get anywhere the SEC need to ascertain how payments to police officers were accounted for on the books and whether the payments were a misrepresentation in the accounts. Moreover, they need to prove that investors were misled and gave News Corp an advantage over business rivals. At this stage, NC are probably not too worried abut the US side escalating. However, things could certainly change with more revelations.

4. So Much For Subtlety

This just looks like a pre-emptive strike by the Democrats leading up to 2012. They won’t want Fox reporting fairly and objectively on the election. They want them in the tank the same way the rest of the media is.

There remains no evidence at all that NI has done any such thing.

I’ve changed the headline, reflecting my view that this is now more unlikely to lead anywhere.

Whether it comes to anything or not, every rumour like this will have a negative impact on News Corpse PR and will dent their share price. Ultimately it will be withdrawal of investors as Murdoch’s handling of this proves to be inept that will do for him.

7. Alisdair Cameron

It could conceivably give Murdoch room to spin and wriggle free, since it might be the case that by being able to debunk the 9/11 hacking allegations, he will seek to discredit by assocaiation the (pretty fully evidenced) charges in the UK.
Also, doesn’t your heart sink when you read a sentence containing the terms “9/11″, “FBI” and “truth”, “behind closed doors” and “claims”? Fertle ground for troofers, wingnuts etc, all of whom would muddy the waters utterly, and take the focus away from the heart of the matter?

“The story will generate some outraged headlines in the US but I suspect it won’t lead anywhere, especially since it all allegedly happened so long ago.”

Nope, not at all. Of all the assumptions you make here, Sunny, this is the most facile – 9/11 is still remarkably fresh in the minds of many Americans, as are events surrounding it. The antagonism towards the “ground zero mosque” demonstrates that perfectly, even though it’s actually a cultural centre and streets away from ground zero.

Hacking allegations are unlikely to be treated as trivial just because of the passing of time. Hell, many Americans still bear grudges about the civil war!


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  2. sunny hundal

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  3. Liza Harding

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  4. Claire Butler

    RT @libcon How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  5. Paul Burgin

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  6. Stephe Meloy

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  7. Jill Hayward

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  8. Bob Moss

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  9. Deborah Ffrench

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  10. Deborah Ffrench

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? I actually think the corruption angle has more legs http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  11. Nicola Chan

    How badly will the FBI investigation hurt Murdoch? http://bit.ly/rmlYU2

  12. Liberal Conspiracy

    Why the FBI investigation into News Corporation is unlikely to go anywhere http://bit.ly/rmlYU2 (from last night)

  13. sunny hundal

    Why the FBI investigation into News Corporation is unlikely to go anywhere http://bit.ly/rmlYU2 (from last night)

  14. Stew Wilson

    Why the FBI investigation into News Corporation is unlikely to go anywhere http://bit.ly/rmlYU2 (from last night)

  15. Rocki Stone

    Why the FBI investigation into News Corporation is unlikely to go anywhere http://bit.ly/rmlYU2 (from last night)

  16. sunny hundal

    Hate to keep repeating this, but the FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere http://t.co/nFiSxsz

  17. Rocki Stone

    Hate to keep repeating this, but the FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere http://t.co/nFiSxsz

  18. The Gaysian

    Hate to keep repeating this, but the FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere http://t.co/nFiSxsz

  19. Dekionplexis

    Hate to keep repeating this, but the FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere http://t.co/nFiSxsz

  20. Deborah Ffrench

    FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere:
    http://tinyurl.com/6l3krbh

  21. 777MJJ

    FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere:
    http://tinyurl.com/6l3krbh

  22. Owen Blacker

    Hate to keep repeating this, but the FBI investigation into News Corp is unlikely to go anywhere http://t.co/nFiSxsz

  23. Liane Roy-Brandt

    Why the FBI probe is unlikely to hurt Murdoch | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/2ZtxGhD via @libcon





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS






48 Comments



93 Comments



23 Comments



51 Comments



10 Comments



26 Comments



23 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Chaise Guevara posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right

» Mary Tracy posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Trooper Thompson posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Robin Hood: backed by the rich, backed by the rest, says new poll | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis

» Colin Hall posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right

» re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» steveb posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Paul posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Conby posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'