Boris backs Ed Balls on cutting VAT


by Don Paskini    
July 4, 2011 at 11:30 am

Boris Johnson’s column in the Daily Telegraph is focused on the wonderfully wingnutty argument that Andy Murray lost in Wimbledon because Britain’s 50p tax rate meant that he wasn’t incentivised to strive as hard as his rivals from lower tax countries.

This is intended as a warning about how the UK can’t compete internationally with other countries which have lower tax rates on the wealthy.

But he does acknowledge that there is an even higher priority than tax cuts for Scottish British tennis stars:

I am not saying that the 50p rate is the only problem: if we were to cut taxes now, it might be best to start with VAT to get people shopping again.

That echoes the argument made by Ed Balls – that what’s needed is a temporary VAT cut to put more money in people’s pockets, increase consumer confidence, cut inflation and boost the economy.

Boris Johnson is desperately trying to distance himself from the Tories, one minute appealing to his base of wealthy right-wingers, the next backing Ed Balls against George Osborne on tax cuts.

I guess one consolation is that the more time he spends posturing and winding up his rivals for the Tory leadership, the less time he’s got for his other hobbies of putting up tube fares and sacking police officers.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Don Paskini is deputy-editor of LC. He also blogs at donpaskini. He is on twitter as @donpaskini
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


7 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


Boris’ argument may indeed be wingnutty: it’s also wrong.

Foreign sportsmen pay UK taxes on appreaance moneys and tournament winnings earned in the UK.

I think it’s only FIFA and Olympic events that don’t, which requires special contracts, maybe even laws.

2. Richard W

Of course Andy Murray would not have tried harder if the headline tax rate was lower. I think Boris is misunderstanding something else he has heard. The issue is a sportsperson who comes to the UK to compete are not just taxed on appearance fees and winnings won while in the UK. The tax authorities also want a proportion of their worldwide endorsement earnings from outside the UK. UEFA have said it was unlikely to offer finals to the UK for that reason.The Government agreed to waive the tax for this year’s Champions League final at Wembley. Usain Bolt withdrew from a UK event because the UK tax authorities would have taxed him on global earnings.

The best athletes will still come to the absolute top prestigious events even with the tax. However, the tax situation is a disincentive for those just outside the top athletes in other sporting events held in the UK.

Amusing as usual from Boris, but its a fair point! We do need lower taxes and in the long run it would benefit everyone.
But I can’t believe he is suggesting cutting VAT. I would like to see it cut in the long run because 20% is too high, but I don’t pretend it would do anything for consumption. Everyone laughed at Labour when they cut VAT to 15% and said it would have to go back up (sure enough it did), frankly it did sod all then, and would do sod all now, apart from cost us money.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Boris backs Balls on VAT http://bit.ly/jVxuEj

  2. Brian Moylan

    RT @libcon: Boris backs Balls on VAT http://bit.ly/jVxuEj #vat #ukpolitics

  3. Phil Wass

    Boris backs Balls on VAT | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/MiFs31k via @libcon #in

  4. Tax Advisor » Boris backs Balls on VAT | Liberal Conspiracy

    [...] here: Boris backs Balls on VAT | Liberal Conspiracy More on this:Why Ed Balls is wrong on cutting VAT – MoneyWeek Comments (17) Ed Balls thinks [...]





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



8 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



16 Comments



83 Comments



203 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» rentergirl posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» sunny hundal posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Tyler posted on When disabled people want to work - employers can hold the back

» pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Jared Earle posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Craig Grannell posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely

» Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely

» JIm posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» K Carington Smith posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely

» pagar posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» leftlinks posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?