Published: June 10th 2011 - at 9:27 amGovernment’s own report admits welfare cuts will reduce incentives to work
After weeks of asking and several Freedom Of Information requests, I’ve finally unearthed the “assessment” the DWP did into Time Limiting (to one year) the Employment and Support Allowance (ESA)!
Clearly I use the word assessment in much the way ATOS do: pick a policy and then write some stuff that proves what you want to say.
Just in case you are not an uber-geek like me and can’t stay awake long enough to plough through 16 pages of fairy stories, here’s a quick summary:
» It overwhelmingly affects the poorest most. The % impact falls from the highest in the 1st decile of earnings to the lowest in the 10th.
» It estimates that 60% will simply switch to income-based ESA and not be affected. This is absolutely ridiculous, pie-in the sky rubbish. I have absolutely no idea how they can make this claim.
» The report concludes that over the term of the parliament, 90% of those placed into the Work Related Activity Group (WRAG) will be affected.
» ALL groups will lose income on average through this measure.
» It is based on an assumption that 50% of claims will be appealed! How are they able to go forward with a system this inaccurate?
» The report itself claims that 700,000 will be affected by the Time Limit – a figure previously hotly debated, ranging from 400,000 to 1 million. It is expected to cut benefits for those not fully fit for work by £1.2 billion per year.
» The report acknowledges, just as I’ve been warning, that this is a disincentive to work and may push couples into divorce or into giving up on work altogether. However, they admit that they have no idea how significant this will be.
Possibly the most astonishing part is the claim that the Social Impacts did not need to be investigated, neither under the categories of Health and Well-being, Human Rights or the Justice System. (It does go on to say that an equalities assessment was carried out, which I will do my best to unearth)
As far as I can tell, the research is deeply flawed, based on inaccurate assumptions and incomplete. And surely the disproportionate impact it will have on certain groups is illegal?
If you discount the assumption that 60% will simply move to income based ESA, which I believe is just not true, it is a damning look into what passes for parliamentary research in our so called democracy.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sue is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. She blogs on Diary of a Benefits Scounger and tweets from here.
· Other posts by Sue Marsh
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Conservative Party ,Health ,Westminster
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Are you in the least surprised, Sue?
In truth, the idea that there can be a rational basis for assessing welfare is in itself a fairy story. If you doubt this, imagine that claimants – irrespective of the generosity or otherwise of the rules in place – are divided into two groups. One group is assessed by people of their own ethnic origin, the other by someone from a different ethnic group. Can anyone doubt that those in the second group will get a rougher deal than those in the first?
I will be very surprised if these policies cost the coalition votes – popular support for welfare depends on (perceived) ethnic homogeneity. It has been on the slide for forty years and may well have tipped over, so that the party proposing the toughest approach gets the most support at the next election. If you doubt this, look at the American experience.
Hi Sue,
Outstanding work.
Here is the EIA for time limited ESA – http://www.dwp.gov.uk/docs/eia-esa-time-limit-wr2011.pdf
I’d warn you that even by the standards of the pathetic EIAs done by DWP officials in recent months, this is a particularly hopeless and infuriating one.
Didn’t they pledge to “end the couple penalty”?
They obviously meant “extend” – damn autocorrect.
Donpaskini – Thanks for the link – I don’t seem very good at digging up this research – the above assessment had been out since Feb and I’d been looking all that time!
The most kafka-esque part of the whole policy is that it ONLY affects working families and those who are careful and have savings. It’s also a massive disincentive to work, which is exactly what IDS says he wants to iron out.
These issues are clearly raised in the government’s own report, yet they can get away with ignoring it by saying they have no idea how many people it will affect yet.
I suppose I’m naive as I’ve only just started to scrutinise Parliament to this degree, but I really am shocked at the complete lack of any evidence or links in the report.
STOP PRESS * Blair and Brown had a tiff.!
That’s the real news that matters to the BBC
It’s no surprise at all. The government’s welfare policies seem to be based on a mixture of naivety and magical thinking.
Silly me! Of course millions of jobs will magically appear for all those thrown off disabillity benefit! Especially in the middle of a recession when unemployment among the able bodied is high. Employers will just be queuing up to take them on.
Meanwhile, back in the real world…..
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- Andrew Ducker
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce and push people out of work http://bit.ly/mGw1HE
- Brian Moylan
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy | http://bit.ly/kUDmaf by @Suey2y #ukpolitics
- Kiz
Oops. RT @andrewducker: Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce and push people out of work http://bit.ly/mGw1HE
- Sue Marsh
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- Wokstation
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- J P
RT @suey2y: Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- Mabel Horrocks
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- DarkestAngel
RT @suey2y: Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- Len Arthur
Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- Maggie W
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- steve turner
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- Kevin Davidson
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce and push people out of work http://bit.ly/mGw1HE
- Phil McDuff
Link: Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://j.mp/kkGCMI
- Andy S
Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- David Marsh
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/KspHHp0 via @libcon
- yorkierosie
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will reduce incentives to work | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/oNPvt56 via @libcon >>Sue Marsh
- paulstpancras
Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- Max
RT @libcon: Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- Philippa Cowderoy
Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- Fazey Pie
Government's own report admits welfare cuts will increase divorce http://bit.ly/knwz7i
- Nathaniel Mathews
RT @libcon: Government's own report admits welfare cuts will reduce incentives to work http://t.co/fLfuBYX
- Alexandra Singer
RT @libcon: Government's own report admits welfare cuts will reduce incentives to work http://t.co/lMhPJXd
- Anfortas_Fisher
Government’s own report admits welfare cuts will reduce incentives to work | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/cwBM7TDF via @libcon
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
48 Comments 92 Comments 23 Comments 50 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 23 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
 |
LATEST COMMENTS » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Trooper Thompson posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Robin Hood: backed by the rich, backed by the rest, says new poll | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis » Colin Hall posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » steveb posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Paul posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Conby posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Jim posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » JC posted on Why Cameron's claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong » pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' |
