Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation?
contribution by Richard Blogger
Lord Norman Warner keeps turning up like a turd that will not flush away. He keeps being brought up by the media as a “previous Labour Minister” that “supports Lansley’s NHS policies”.
Why is it that he supports “the coalition’s plans to reform the NHS”? Why, on BBC Westminster Hour did he tell Carolyn Quinn that he is “critical of Labour’s opposition to proposals to increase competition within the NHS“?
Might it be because in 2008 he became:
nonexecutive chairman of a company – UK Health Gateway – which promises to “open the door” for overseas businesses selling to the National Health Service
In other words, he became part of a company that would benefit from competition in the NHS.
Might it also be because he also: “works as an adviser to Xansa, a technology firm, and Byotrol, an antimicrobial company, which both sell services or products to the NHS” and was “paid by DLA Piper, which advised ministers on the £12 billion IT project for the NHS” projects that he was responsible for when he was a government minister?
When Lord Warner supports a Tory Government about a policy to introduce more private sector involvement into the NHS, it is simply because I think Lord Warner has a vested interested in doing so.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
51 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Thanks for bringing this up – he sounded highly suspect on the programme. With someone like him on, being ‘labour’, the BBC fulfils its requirement to be ‘balanced’ while presenting a consensus.
This happens all the time, with no declaration of interest.
Skating very close to the libel laws there. Sunny, you might want to revise this.
a few more “in my opinion”s perhaps…..
NHS privatisation is now a certainty. The physical facilities will be sold off in this Parliament, the insurance element in the next.
And you’re slipping, Worstall – the least we expect from you is an explanation of why a market-based healthcare sector must necessarily deliver a better service than a state-run oligopoly together with an assertion as a matter of fact that anyone who thinks otherwise is stupid, vicious or both. You know you can do it.
I don’t know how a government can sell off something that is ours and don’t have a mandate to do so. All of us since the NHS’s beginning have paid for it’s property and research. We all have a stake in it, so if it’s sold off what do we all get back? Maybe I’m naive but the NHS policy from the Tories or the establishment, seem completely wrong or immoral.
“I don’t know how a government can sell off something that is ours and don’t have a mandate to do so. All of us since the NHS’s beginning have paid for it’s property and research.”
Ooooh, I dunno, maybe the same way they stole the hospitals when the NHS was started? St Barts has been a charitable hospital since the 13th century…..didn’t stop the NHS “acquiring” it in 1948 though.
But wasn’t St Barts bought with public money? And hasn’t it been the case since the founding of the NHS that public money has gone into updating buildings, paying for equipment and the hospitals belonging to all of us no matter where about in the country one lives?
“But wasn’t St Barts bought with public money?”
No.
Further, it’s the government which owns the various hospitals. So, if they’re sold, it’s the government that will get the money. Leave aside that we’re talking about hospitals here: what is the problem you’ve got with this?
The government owns office buildings, built with and maintained by tax money. Sometimes they sell some of these buildings because they don’t need them any more. So, what’s wrong with this? The government gets the value of the building when it sells it.
But do the public get the benefit? They are our buildings and there is no mandate to sell them. If the public by voting decide to allow a government to do this then fair enough but at the moment they don’t. This is highly undemocratic by selling off what is ours. Let there be a referendum where this whole issue can be discussed.
If you go back to 1945 Labour promised to form the NHS and the people voted for it and this was one of the major issue at that time. Labour fulfilled that promise.
Also remember the idea for the NHS first came from a charity in South Wales you could say the NHS was an outcome from what was then the Big Society.
4
Yep, they can sell anything off, that’s how Thatcher ensured that the economy was awash with money,prvatization was enabled by the taxpayers of the 50s 60s and 70s.
Even the ‘Tell Sid’ adverts were paid for by the taxpayer, nothing like redistributing wealth.
4. (Steven): “I don’t know how a government can sell off something that is ours and don’t have a mandate to do so”
Well Labour sold off our tax offices to a company based in a tax haven, so now we lease them from Mapperley PLC. Nice one Labour. They also lied int he House about this. So Labour have form on this one.
Can we enforce disclosure of interest? Why is the rubbish these people who will dain the NHS being reported mostly unchallenged and without reference to their bias?
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Liberal Conspiracy
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- MerseyMal
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- daveno7
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- malcolm
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Rory Hegarty
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Paul Hunter
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- WMD-Gnome
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation?
We realy need to sack these people - Watching You
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Gavin Duff
“@libcon: Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://t.co/v5h4yJR” // what a hateful money grabbing swine
- Mark Clapham
RT @libcon: Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Kim Blake
“@libcon: Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://t.co/v5h4yJR” // what a hateful money grabbing swine
- suzy franklin
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Pucci Dellanno
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- sunny hundal
Is it any surprise Labour peer Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? asks @richardblogger – http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- sunny hundal
Is it any surprise Labour peer Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? asks @richardblogger – http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- sheila mary roberts
Is it any surprise Labour peer Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? asks @richardblogger – http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Prime Economics
Is it any surprise Labour peer Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? asks @richardblogger – http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Ann Pettifor
Is it any surprise Labour peer Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? asks @richardblogger – http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- Barbara Crowther
Is it any surprise Labour peer Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? asks @richardblogger – http://bit.ly/lr5dzF
- 36grundy
RT @libcon: Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://t.co/fezET28
- Daniel Pitt
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://bit.ly/lr5dzF #ConDemNation
- Paul Manzotti
@EvanHD Seems it's more like *companies*: http://bit.ly/kbQ0wY http://bit.ly/k2cKw1 http://bit.ly/jjKM7a Main 1 is UK Health Gateway. MTF
- Alison Charlton
Lord Warner the only Labour peer to vote against the Rea amendment. This is why: http://t.co/pIThKK9T via @libcon
- Ferret Dave
Lord Warner the only Labour peer to vote against the Rea amendment. This is why: http://t.co/pIThKK9T via @libcon
- Rooftop Jaxx
Lord Warner the only Labour peer to vote against the Rea amendment. This is why: http://t.co/pIThKK9T via @libcon
- Mabel Horrocks
Lord Warner the only Labour peer to vote against the Rea amendment. This is why: http://t.co/pIThKK9T via @libcon
- DarkestAngel
Lord Warner the only Labour peer to vote against the Rea amendment. This is why: http://t.co/pIThKK9T via @libcon
- Jill Hayward
Lord Warner the only Labour peer to vote against the Rea amendment. This is why: http://t.co/pIThKK9T via @libcon
- caroline holding
Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://t.co/hoSUbg65 #ripnhs #hmmm
- Angus Carruthers
MT @labour52rose Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://t.co/yv72SUqU via @RichardBlogger @libcon
- Jill Hayward
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- Izzy Green
MT @labour52rose Any surprise Lord Warner is defending NHS privatisation? http://t.co/yv72SUqU via @RichardBlogger @libcon
- Phil Jones
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- steve
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- Matt Senior
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- keithyboy
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- Nick H.
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- Kevin Donovan
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
- dianedalziel
.@ShippersUnbound Any surprise Lord Warner wants NHS bill? He's said it for ages & is non-exec at pvt health firm http://t.co/gZVeYvrI
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









