OECD caught back-tracking on cuts agenda
We reported yesterday that the OECD was sounding alarm over the UK’s growth slowing down
Later in the day the OECD’s spokesperson went on Sky News to try and back-track on what they said earlier. Typically, right-wingers did not miss a chance to crow about it.
But what did the OECD’s Pier Carlo Padoan say in his interview with The Times?
They have now released a transcript of the interview.
They key point here isn’t that they’re back-tracking on the cuts (welcome though as that is) but that they’re also alarmed that UK’s growth is slowing down unexpectedly.
And why has it slowed down so much? We said it months ago: that cuts would threaten our nascent economic recovery. And now its turning out to be true.
Full transcript
Q The OECD has been very supportive of the fiscal consolidation plans in the UK. Do you worry that they are going to bear down too hard on growth? I see you have taken your growth forecasts down again, from 1.7 to 1.4 per cent.
A We are incorporating new evidence. We are also saying that fiscal consolidation should be pursued, but at the same time we see merit in slowing the pace of fiscal consolidation if there is not so good news on the growth front, and we have seen good and bad news recently. So we not are saying just stick to it, we are saying take that into account. Especially given the fact that maybe monetary policy has less of a policy space to use because of the headline inflation story. So we fully recognize that in this transition phase while moving towards fiscal consolidation, which is needed because of the size of the deficit, that [the] pace of that could be modulated with respect to the performance results.
Q But even if that means potentially meeting fiscal targets a year later? Is that a worthwhile sacrifice to make in a sense?
A That is an intertemporal trade off. I would not say specifically a year later, I would say that you can slow down the pace over the next quarters, if things turn out to be weaker than expected.
Q But you are saying things are going to turn out weaker than expected because your growth forecasts are lower than the official forecasts.
A We have seen that they are a bit weaker than expected; should that continue to be the case then there is scope for, as I said, slowing the pace.
Q Does that mean slower cuts or reversing tax hikes? What’s the right way for a country in this situation to slow the pace of fiscal consolidation?
A I would not reverse the measures I have announced because that would bear down on credibility; I would slow down the pace of spending cuts rather.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Nothing in the transcript you present here indicates any difference from what you published yesterday. Yesterday you claimed that the OECD now backed a slow down in cuts. They pointed out that they did not such thing and that you had got it wrong. To suggest that that is a back-track is ridiculous.
Essentially you’re argument is that you must have been right in your original interpretation of what the OECD said and if they tell you you were wrong than they must now be changing their mind.
Look at your transcript. It proves you wrong too.
“If things turn out to be weaker”
“should that continue to be the case”
For anyone not invested in attacking the government these lines read that the OECD currently supports the cuts as they are but point out that a change in circumstances should result in a change of course.
But be honest Sunny, how can you really now claim that OECD is back-tracking when it says you misunderstood them? Isn’t it more likely that you actually did just misunderstand them?
What Anthony said. Just face it, you got the story wrong. The decent thing to do is to own up and admit it instead of just digging in – that’s what we should expect from the tabloids and not from a supposedly left wing blog.
Try this report a few days ago in the Telegraph:
The latest figures from the Office for National Statistics(ONS) confirmed the initial estimate, that Britain’s economy grew just 0.5pc in the first quarter, after contracting by the same amount in the last three months of 2010.
This means the economy has effectively stagnated over the past six months – a far worse performance than Britain’s major trading partners. [25 May]
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/8535229/UK-economy-held-back-by-weak-consumer-spending.html
And this report on consumer spending in April:
Britain’s retailers are enduring the toughest trading conditions for at least a decade and a half, as consumer spending wilts in the face of higher inflation and the first drop in personal spending power since the slump of the early 1980s. [12 April]
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2011/apr/12/consumer-spending-inflation
And the recently released ONS figures for business investment in the first quarter:
Business Investment 7.1% down in first quarter of 2011
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/cci/nugget.asp?id=258
looks like tory cabinet ministers are starting to get worried about the depth of the cuts.
independendent article today.
“George Osborne has been forced to fend off doubts about his economic strategy from cabinet colleagues worried that growth is so weak. The Chancellor, who refuses to consider a “Plan B”, defended his approach in a discussion on Britain’s economic prospects at Tuesday’s cabinet meeting.”
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
OECD caught back-tracking on cuts agenda http://bit.ly/kuhEgA
- Brian Moylan
RT @libcon: OECD caught back-tracking on cuts agenda http://bit.ly/kuhEgA #oecd #cuts #ukpolitics
- Jose Aguiar
OECD caught back-tracking on cuts agenda http://bit.ly/kuhEgA
- sunny hundal
@davidbengeob i'm shocked that right-wing orgs agree with a right-wing leader. PS, on the OECD http://bit.ly/kuhEgA – WAKE UP
- sunny hundal
@davidbengeob i'm shocked that right-wing orgs agree with a right-wing leader. PS, on the OECD http://bit.ly/kuhEgA – WAKE UP
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
48 Comments 93 Comments 23 Comments 55 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 23 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Just Visiting posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Shinsei1967 posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Chaise Guevara posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » Mary Tracy posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Trooper Thompson posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Robin Hood: backed by the rich, backed by the rest, says new poll | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis |










