Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn?
contribution by Owen Tudor
I’ve expressed scepticism before about the Government’s commitment to meet the UN target for overseas aid by 2013.
With the news that Defence Secretary Liam Fox has raised concerns about the pledge suggests that we are seeing the beginning of the end for that commitment.
Although Fox has said he is only concerned about tying the Government’s hands, that is the whole point of enshrining the commitment in law.
And it’s worth remembering that the pledge was in both the Labour and Conservative manifestoes, and was part of the coalition agreement.
The Prime Minister’s pledge that the commitment will be met rings slightly hollow – especially as time is running out for the Government to legislate in this Parliamentary session.
Is this going to be yet another broken promise to add to the list?
---------------------------
| Tweet |
This is a guest post.
· Other posts by Guest
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Foreign affairs
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
I don’t know. I think the 0.7% commitment is such a key part of Hilton’s detoxification programme, and has been restated so many times, that they would find it hard to row back on it. As I understand it, the big real terms increase isn’t scheduled to happen until the last year of the Coalition, by which time they’re obviously hoping that the departmental budgets will be a bit slacker.
I tend to think of this as Fox doing his usual Thatcherite attention-grabbing act for the benefit of disgruntled Tory backbenchers.
It’s notable that this wavering on foreign aid comes at the same time as a disgusting proposal to give preferential treatment to ex-soldiers and their families – allocating health and housing on the basis of job instead of on the basis of need. Soldiers will apparently get preferential access to IVF if they have sustained genital injuries. Why they should be preferred among other people who may equally well have sustained genital injuries in the course of work, leisure or an assault hasn’t been explained. And why schools with significant numbers of soldiers’ children should get extra funding – again, instead of the progressive principle of allocating on the basis of need – hasn’t been explained either. Unless the left stands up against this kind of reactionary nonsense, there isn’t a lot of hope.
I suspect you won’t see a retreat from the headline policy but rather a continuation of the current rather sneaky practice of transferring line items from the FCO to DFID.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- sunny hundal
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- The Bee
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- Richard Murphy
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- Brit Lefit
Most British ppl resent AID abroad. Trade better
RT @libcon:Will the Foreign #Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal - Pucci Dellanno
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- Demands for Ken Clarke’s head over rape comments, Cameron pushes NHS reforms and an elected chamber for the Lords?: round up of political blogs for 14 May – 20 May | British Politics and Policy at LSE
[...] ponders the political consequences of the spat and Liberal Conspiracy wonders whether this will prompt another U-turn from the PM. David Taylor at Left Foot Forward writes an open letter to David Cameron to remind [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
48 Comments 93 Comments 23 Comments 53 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 23 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Shinsei1967 posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Chaise Guevara posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » Mary Tracy posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Trooper Thompson posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Robin Hood: backed by the rich, backed by the rest, says new poll | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis » Colin Hall posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » steveb posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? |










