Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn?
contribution by Owen Tudor
I’ve expressed scepticism before about the Government’s commitment to meet the UN target for overseas aid by 2013.
With the news that Defence Secretary Liam Fox has raised concerns about the pledge suggests that we are seeing the beginning of the end for that commitment.
Although Fox has said he is only concerned about tying the Government’s hands, that is the whole point of enshrining the commitment in law.
And it’s worth remembering that the pledge was in both the Labour and Conservative manifestoes, and was part of the coalition agreement.
The Prime Minister’s pledge that the commitment will be met rings slightly hollow – especially as time is running out for the Government to legislate in this Parliamentary session.
Is this going to be yet another broken promise to add to the list?
---------------------------
| Tweet |
10 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
I don’t know. I think the 0.7% commitment is such a key part of Hilton’s detoxification programme, and has been restated so many times, that they would find it hard to row back on it. As I understand it, the big real terms increase isn’t scheduled to happen until the last year of the Coalition, by which time they’re obviously hoping that the departmental budgets will be a bit slacker.
I tend to think of this as Fox doing his usual Thatcherite attention-grabbing act for the benefit of disgruntled Tory backbenchers.
It’s notable that this wavering on foreign aid comes at the same time as a disgusting proposal to give preferential treatment to ex-soldiers and their families – allocating health and housing on the basis of job instead of on the basis of need. Soldiers will apparently get preferential access to IVF if they have sustained genital injuries. Why they should be preferred among other people who may equally well have sustained genital injuries in the course of work, leisure or an assault hasn’t been explained. And why schools with significant numbers of soldiers’ children should get extra funding – again, instead of the progressive principle of allocating on the basis of need – hasn’t been explained either. Unless the left stands up against this kind of reactionary nonsense, there isn’t a lot of hope.
I suspect you won’t see a retreat from the headline policy but rather a continuation of the current rather sneaky practice of transferring line items from the FCO to DFID.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- sunny hundal
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- The Bee
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- Richard Murphy
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- Brit Lefit
Most British ppl resent AID abroad. Trade better
RT @libcon:Will the Foreign #Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal - Pucci Dellanno
RT @libcon: Will the Foreign Aid commitment be another Cameron u-turn? http://bit.ly/lrsoal
- Demands for Ken Clarke’s head over rape comments, Cameron pushes NHS reforms and an elected chamber for the Lords?: round up of political blogs for 14 May – 20 May | British Politics and Policy at LSE
[...] ponders the political consequences of the spat and Liberal Conspiracy wonders whether this will prompt another U-turn from the PM. David Taylor at Left Foot Forward writes an open letter to David Cameron to remind [...]
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









