Plans for May Day Trafalgar Sq occupation
The ‘Trafalgar Square Anti Cuts Occupation’ say they will celebrate their one month anniversary this May Day weekend with a 48-hour occupation starting at 6.30pm Saturday 30th April.
They have staged 24-hour peaceful anti-cuts occupations of Trafalgar Square over the last four weekends, with up to 100-200 people taking part each weekend.
This weekend’s occupation coincides with the London May Day Rally being held on Sunday 1st May on Trafalgar Square.
The occupation activists say their key aims are:
* To raise awareness of the ideological cuts that the Government is instigating – without mandate – and how they are affecting the most vulnerable in society.
* To create a safe space for all, including parents and children, where alternatives to current policy can be learned about and discussed, with workshops, talks, debates and creative art.
* To defend the right to protest. The group intends to show that without police presence, protesters can organise themselves peacefully and lawfully. This has already been successfully demonstrated on previous occupations, when the police stayed at a distance and there was no conflict. If there are attempts to remove participants, they will resist non-violently through passive resistance. The group refuses to use violence when it is violence done to our society that it is trying to resist.
To make the square livable for 48 hours, participants are asked to look after the area and put litter in bins provided. And bring some food.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
34 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
@2 Please define “British values”, ensure that they are unique values that only someone who is British would possess.
@1 Because anyone who’s vaguely left-wing is a fan of Stalin?
@2 Republicans don’t have British values? What are “British values” anyway? Because I’m having an argument about it on Tumblr and this guy doesn’t seem to know either.
@Jasmine
As for British values, try my post @41 in the thread: Why I think the Monarchy is great, by Chris Dillow.
Of greater merit and insight, there is always that delicious satirical poem: A True-born Englishman (1703), by Daniel Defoe, author of Robinson Crusoe, who is widely regarded as the first of the many novelists writing in the English language:
http://www.luminarium.org/editions/trueborn.htm
“I wonder how many russia’s took to the streets in support of Stalin during his reign? Just a thought.”
Stalin had a Moscow constituency and it was not unknown for his total vote in elections to exceed 100% of the registered electorate.
The sad aspect is that Stalin had and still has an enthusiastic fan club at home and abroad.
For much of the post-war period, the Communist Party in France was the most Stalinist minded this side of the Iron Curtain. When Georges Marchais, Secretary General of the Party in France (1972-94), was pressed for comment on the crumbling Soviet empire c.1990, he replied: “I tell you, they didn’t arrest enough. They didn’t imprison enough. If they had been tougher and more vigilant, they wouldn’t have got into the situation they are in now.” [Jonathan Fenby: France on the Brink (1999)]
“hahahaha omg the dodgy royalist comments on this are hilarious”
Dig a little and I think you’ll find the “super royalists” know of Britain’s history, our traditions of political thought or about our heritage of literary and scientific achievment.
By way of a public service, I thought to post links to seminal texts of British political thinkers so the super royalists can get up to speed:
Thomas Hobbes: The Leviathan (1660)
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html
John Locke: Two Treatises of Government (1689)
http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/locke/government.pdf
David Hume: Of the Original Contract (1748)
http://www.constitution.org/dh/origcont.htm
Jeremy Bentham: Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation (1781)
http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/bentham/index.htm
Seminal texts of British political thinkers continued:
JS Mill: On Liberty (1859), Considerations on Representative Government (1861) and Utilitarianism (1863)
http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/mill.htm
Walter Bagehot: The English Constitution (1873)
http://dbwf.net/images/W_Bagehot_on_the_British_Constitution(1877).pdf
Bob B.
I believe you are simply posting what I said people were being proud of;
Being British and Britain itself.
Something The Left hates so much.
@12: “So try again commie.”
You probably don’t appreciate this but none of the seminal texts of the British political thinkers I posted @10 and @11 were in any sense “marxist” although Locke did have a moral labour theory of value. Curiously, for all that he had much influence on those who framed the US Constitution in the late 18th century.
Accusing me of being a “commie” displays lamentable political ignorance. My main complaint about royalty is that it is routinely used by way of the ancient Roman prescription of bread and circuses to divert public attention from news they would likely find unwelcome, such as this news item on the front page of Friday’s FT:
Hospitals told to look for 50% more savings
http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/b087ff20-71d1-11e0-9adf-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss&ftcamp=crm/email/2011429/nbe/UKMorningHeadlines/product#axzz1KuTsvIGG
I wonder how many more healthcare jobs will go because of that, and how much care for patients will be cut back and how many patients will die sooner as a result..
“Something The Left hates so much.”
I’ve often posted that I regard the traditional left-wing, right-wing distinction as meaningless and misleading – just to take one glaring example, Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union signed a Friendship Treaty on 28 September 1939 when Britain and France were already at war with Germany. This is the text of that treaty:
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/gsbound.asp
@Bob B
Yes Bob, Stalin was one of the bad guys but had an enthusiastic fan club at home and abroad. So does the royal family. Most of our royal family where in Hitler’s fan club. We should not forget that It was the’ lefty’ British working class that built the spitfire, not some chinless /spineless toff. Apparently Obama is a socialist and a Nazi. Is he a real America or black? Perhaps he’s both royalist and a Stalinist as well? Perhaps the climate change is a conspiracy to create world wide communism? Just more dumb assed thoughts….
Engels on Kate Middleton: “The English bourgeoisie are so deeply penetrated by a sense of social inferiority that they keep up, at their own expense, an ornamental caste of drones to represent the nation at state functions; and consider themselves honored whenever one of themselves is found worthy of admission into this select and privileged body, manufactured, after all, by themselves.”
A great day celebrating the wedding of two people they’ve never met, never will meet, and who consider them worthless commoners – cannon fodder essentially. Yes, a really great day. Neurosis much?
Well this is lovely, but what about the may day occupation of trafalger square?
“Well this is lovely, but what about the may day occupation of trafalger square?”
Anyone running a book on the number of arrests by the close of play?
There is no way – no way in heaven – that you’ll beat this for an affecting spectacle…
@10 and @11 relate:
Someone has pointed out to me that in the links to seminal texts of British political thinkers, I omitted to mention the English Hegelians:
Bernard Bosanquet: The Philosophical Theory of the State:
http://socserv.mcmaster.ca/~econ/ugcm/3ll3/bosanquet/state.pdf
Thomas Hill Green: Lectures on the Principles of Political Obligation
http://www.efm.bris.ac.uk/het/green/obligation.pdf
My only excuse is that they were writing in the tradition of German idealism, not the British tradition. But in their time, both were influential, Green especially so on notions of “positive freedom” and moral obligations in politics and in civil communities. On the (crucial) distinction between notions of “negative” and “positive” freedom, see Isaiah Berlin: Two Concepts of Liberty:
http://www.wiso.uni-hamburg.de/fileadmin/wiso_vwl/johannes/Ankuendigungen/Berlin_twoconceptsofliberty.pdf
OP: “To make the square livable for 48 hours, participants are asked to look after the area and put litter in bins provided.”
This statement carries the suggestion that protesters might be less considerate for a shorter event.
In case anyone is interested, I can add links to two seminal texts on political thought in Britain from the 20th century:
Michael Oakeshott: On Being Conservative
http://faculty.rcc.edu/sellick/On%20Being%20Conservative.pdf
Karl Popper: The Open Society and Its Enemies (2 vols)
http://ambidextrouscivicdiscourse.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Karl-Popper-Open-Society-and-Its-Enemies.pdf
@Bob B – How do you convert a socialist? Remind them about their selfish gene (I love Hobbes too) ![]()
Want to stop socialists blaming capitalism for everything, even the weather? Remind them that socialists are not allowed to dream! Marx doesn’t like dreams
Therefore i don’t like Marx
.
@18: “How do you convert a socialist?”
What with Tony Blair and the previous collapse of the Soviet empire, there aren’t many fully confessed socialists around any longer.
As best I can tell, even Tony Blair wants to forget all about that 22-page letter he wrote to Michael Foot in 1982:
“In the 22-page letter, the 29-year-old Mr Blair tells then Labour leader Michael Foot how reading Marx had ‘irreversibly altered’ his outlook. He also praises Tony Benn, agreeing with the left-winger’s analysis that Labour’s right-wing was bankrupt.”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/5081798.stm
As for China, nowadays we are getting books like: Red Capitalism, by Fraser Howie and Carl Walter – here is a review in the WSJ:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704132204576190864046071514.html
I feel bound to say that this is very impressive – and clearly intended to be so:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSuEZSm8ZEA
By comparison, Trooping the Colour, Britain’s equivalent, looks very modest:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOh1cqAsJo0
God save all those bears. As the Duke of Wellington was reported to have said on inspecting his troops just before one of his battles: I don’t know what they do to the enemy but by G*d they frighten me.
For those interested [ http://thoughcowardsflinch.com/2011/04/30/the-occupation-of-trafalgar-square-and-other-concerns-of-space/ ]
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- overhere
RT @libcon: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- Carl Packman
RT @libcon: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- Tony Dowling
RT @libcon: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- Pucci Dellanno
RT @libcon: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- Jane Calveley
RT @libcon: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- Rob Marchant
RT @libcon Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds >>> we must support them again, it went so well last time
- Sean Gittins
RT @libcon: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square http://bit.ly/jfilds
- Occupy Trafalgar
Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Sq | Liberal Conspiracy http://fb.me/MzusQEBm
- Caer
RT @OccupyTraf Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Sq | Liberal Conspiracy http://fb.me/MzusQEBm
- IshtarCelt
RT @Caer23: RT @OccupyTraf Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Sq | Liberal Conspiracy http://fb.me/MzusQEBm
- Vegan Panda
RT @OccupyTraf: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Sq | Liberal Conspiracy http://fb.me/MzusQEBm
- Queer Resistance
Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Square | LibCon Article #occupytraf #policestate #stokescroft http://fb.me/J6M6QeP2
- Red Ladder Theatre
RT @OccupyTraf: Plans for May Day occupation of Trafalgar Sq | Liberal Conspiracy http://fb.me/MzusQEBm
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » supermarketsweep posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Planeshift posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









