How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper
“The collapse in Lib Dem support is the most dramatic feature of the party landscape since last year’s election,” writes YouGov’s Peter Kellner in the latest edition of Prospect magazine.
YouGov’s most recent nationwide survey, involving nearly 50,000 people, shows that as many as 69 per cent of Lib Dem voters have deserted the party since last May. But so have 24 per cent of Tories and 16 per cent of Labour voters. Labour is the only one of the three main parties whose recruits outweigh its deserters.
Of the Lib Dem deserters, 2m would now vote Labour, and 1.3m now don’t know—although bear in mind that most of the 2m who have switched to Labour are Labour identifiers (people who “generally” think of themselves as Labour) returning home since the last election.
Ouch! This is also a theme the upcoming New Statesman magazine will look at; I’ve been asked whether I regret voting for the Libdems in 2010.
Peter Kellner’s research shows that the Libdems have lost huge ground among students, trade union members, Guardian or Independent readers and those who identify themselves as very or fairly left wing.
Here is the change, by newspaper readers

Does this mean that Libdem cheerleaders at the Guardian are now over-represented?
Full Prospect article here. Sunder Katwala at Next Left calls it the Guardian’s “Labour moment”.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
I’d put money on the ‘other’ group being the Greens. They should do well out of this, especially if AV passes.
Its also amazing how many have returned to the Labour fold, it was a very short defection. Shows how little choice we all have.
Does this mean that Libdem cheerleaders at the Guardian are now over-represented?
It means millions are now without representation, that’s what it means.
“Does this mean that Libdem cheerleaders at the Guardian are now over-represented?”
As far as I can make out there tend to be at least as many anti-Lib Dem pieces in the Guardian as pro-Lib Dem pieces if not more.
@1 I’d hazard that most of the defections are temporary – at the moment there’s only one party of opposition so people dissatisfied with the government only really have one place to go. This doesn’t mean they’ve permanently switched sides though – look how many were theoretically backing the Conservatives a month before the general election compared to how many actually voted for them.
Do the Mail figures mean that their readers are the least politically affiliated, or the most politically entrenched (least movement in any direction)? Not sure if I’m reading the graph right but seems like the latter, which is interesting in itself.
What’s worrying me is that +5% change in Tory students. That cannot bode well for the future at all.
@4 I think that depends how anti Tory the defectors from Libdems are.
The fact that they can switch between the three parties shows just how similar they all are. If one of them had a policy set that stood for something different, even with only a small amount of supporters there would be a lot less switching of support between them and the other two.
S.Pill,
I noted that figure as well – albeit I’m not certain its bode ill or well. But it probably simply reflects the huge collapse in Liberal Democrat support amongst students – some will always go to the Conservatives, and it is now probably socially less acceptable to be a Liberal Democrat in student circles, so Conservative no longer has the same bad reputation. An interesting case study in detoxification perhaps?
And some students do agree with the tuition fees policies of course…
Why no mention of the Green Party? It seems highly unlikely that they have not benefited enormously from those of us who have abandoned the ‘Yellow Tories’… I doubt many are going to jump from Lib Dem to BNP / UKIP!
Assuming that Yougovs “polling” actually works, we will all know in 2 weeks. Lets see some concrete predictions of how big this Libdem “meltdown” will be. I am willing to stick my neck out & predict losses of under 200 seats.
Can someone please tell the entire Guardian editorial this!! So they can stop their endless tide of sycophantic apologist pieces.
There is always a core TORRY support base amongst certain segments of the student population. We shouldn’t fool ourselves by romantic notions of left wing politics dominating the student body. I suspect right wing students simply see no hope for the LibDems and have switched accordingly.
I certainly worry about Labour and its left wing creditionals (still too many entrenched NuLabs and Blairites in the party). But I have no faith in the Greens. If the LibDems sold us out quick enough, should the Greens ever matter -I suspect they would prostitute themselves to anyone for a windfarm or two. Ultimately only a party rooted and representing the working class and vulnerable of society can remain truly left wing (sadly we may end up with no left wing party). PR would at least enable the birth of new and purer political entities capable of genuine representation.
You Gov reports current Guardian voting intentions as follows, compared to May 2010:
http://www.nextleft.org/2011/04/labour-moment-as-libdems-now-trail-by.html
Labour 66% (+24%)
LibDems 15% (-30%)
Greens 9% (+5)
Conservative 7% (-)
Other Others 3% (-)
[the Prospect tables are based on Greens being included in Others 12% (+5)]
BlueRock @ 9
I am not sure about that, BlueRock. The Lib Dems have had the taste of blood in their mouths. Who knows were this will end?
I can remember when the fore runners to the Liberal Democrats, the genuine Liberals were dismissed as ‘a bit wooly’. You all know the stereotype the beard, the sandals and the real ale, not to mention the not too distant smell of dope. The blokes were just as bad. I am not saying the stereotype was an accurate reflection of the membership, of course, but it was the image that we all had.
Well that image is in tatters now, isn’t? The little kid at the back of class has managed to weedle his way in with the class bullies, he isn’t just holding the jackets as the other kids suffer, he is actively laying the boot in.
The image of the Lib Dem is now the sharp suited, smarmy bully actively nicking wheel chairs and demanding mental health service closures for ‘our own good’. Look at their literature and the Party Political Broadcasts. They are pretty solidly towing the line that spending money on the vulnerable caused the rescission, not the bankers.
Like it or not politics is becoming more and more polarised. There are going to be less and less shades and those lines are becoming darker and will define who we are in terms of personality and politics. Those remaining Lib Dems are now every bit as my ideological enemy as the Tories have traditionally been. I could never, under any circumstances, share a political platform with people who reject science in favour of ideology, but the Lib Dems are doing exactly that.
Given that the Lib Dems are willing to forsake two hundred years of science for power, are we garner that they are above smearing a dog turds onto a door of the great grandchildren of an immigrant? I think not.
Having read this superb article – seriously, all will be fine if the old Social Democrats and their (left) descendants find their way back to Labour. Then we shall see for real what this CamClegg sham is really all about.
My apologies to others for this unforgivable lapse into friendliness !
@14 Ted
Back to “Newer” Labour Ted…?
Don’t hold your breath will you… there’s a hell of a lot more de-toxifying to be done before many of us will be voting Labour again!
@ 15. Galen10
I understand your reluctance to fully engage with Labour at this early stage but even old fashioned Liberals like me now need a new political home so to speak.
We more or less got our eviction notices last May also !
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Ross Pollard
RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Lee Hyde
RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- hl
This coalition is bad for democracy as lib dems lose support RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Jonathan Davis
Fascinating, thanks @sunny_hundal! – RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- sunny hundal
How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Kerry Abel
RT @sunny_hundal: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- The Friendly Lefty
Interesting piece from @sunny_hundal 'How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper' http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Chunkylimey
RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Brian Moylan
RT @sunny_hundal: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- NewRedHouse
RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Naadir Jeewa
Reading: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper: “The collapse in Lib Dem support is the most dramatic feat… http://bit.ly/gHZTY3
- Naadir Jeewa
Reading: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper: “The collapse in Lib Dem support is the most dramatic feat… http://bit.ly/gHZTY3
- Simeon Haselton
RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Michael Nelles
RT @libcon: How Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH
- Paul Wood
Those graphs are pretty telling. #nickcleggsfault #toryenabler RT @sunny_hundal: How Libdems bled voters – by newspaper http://t.co/lUxIhBp
- Daniel Pitt
How spineless Libdems have bled voters – by newspaper http://bit.ly/ej5dRH #ConDemNation #FibDems
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
48 Comments 93 Comments 23 Comments 53 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 23 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Cylux posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Shinsei1967 posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Chaise Guevara posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » Mary Tracy posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Chaise Guevara posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Chaise Guevara posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Chaise Guevara posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Trooper Thompson posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Robin Hood: backed by the rich, backed by the rest, says new poll | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis » Colin Hall posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » steveb posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? |










