Legal action threat at Gove over EMA cuts


by Sunny Hundal    
February 21, 2011 at 3:38 pm

Legal action could be launched on behalf of students who believe their two-year contracts for study has been breached by the government’s decision to axe the education maintenance allowance (EMA).

The Save EMA campaign is receiving advice from trade union lawyers supported by Unison who are examining whether they can win payments for students who began courses in September expecting two years of financial support.

Students sign an EMA contract which commits them to rules on attendance, punctuality and achievement in return for the payments, prompting the claim that the Government may be obliged to fulfil its part of the bargain for around 300,000 students.

Both Save EMA and Unison are currently gathering further evidence on paper work.

According to a YouGov poll last week almost half the British public oppose the government’s plans to abolish the Education Maintenance Allowances (EMA).

The poll also showed that a substantial amount of those who voted for both coalition parties at the last election and who intend to vote at coming elections also oppose the abolition of the EMA:

· 50 % who voted Lib Dem in 2010 oppose abolition of EMA
· 42% who still intend to vote Lib Dem oppose abolition of EMA
· 27% who voted Conservative in 2010
· 25% who still intend to vote Conservative oppose Abolition of EMA

James Mills, head of the Save EMA campaign, said:

David Cameron went to a few colleges and said, ‘We won’t scrap EMA.’ There was a clear promise that EMA won’t be axed and students joined their courses on that basis and committed themselves for two years.

Michael Gove said before the election that he would not scrap EMA, and that anyone who said he would was a liar.

A report by the think-tank IFS earlier this year destroyed government justifications for cutting EMAs.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


18 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


Is this the same James Mills that is a Parliamentary researcher to a Labour MP, and the same “save EMA” website that is festooned with messages of support from a range of political figures from Ed Balls to Andy Burnham via Ken Livingstone and, um, Polly Toynbee?

To call this astroturfing would be an insult to the makers of that fine material. Risible.

Save EMA is also supported by both Plaid Cymr, the SNP and the Green Party as seen clearly here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1hqlpgyBL7w

Legal action could be launched on behalf of students who believe their two-year contracts for study has been breached by the government’s decision to axe the education maintenance allowance (EMA).

Briefly ducking in from the luxurious world of paternity leave (typos are my daughter’s fault) I’d point out that the EMA contract is between the pupil and the school. The abolition of the EMA scheme is a decision by central Govt (a legal third party) that makes it impossible for the school to fulfil its part of the contract. Look up the doctrine of frustration – I’d argue (or at least, I’d expect the DoE to argue) that these contracts have been frustrated.

It would be an interesting case though, because I’d expect the Trade Unions’ lawyers to argue that the Govt was effectively a party to the contract…

4. Orange Booker

Very interesting that slightly more people in the 18-24 category support the govt’s plans than oppose them. Surely if EMA was as wonderful as is claimed this figure would be very different?

Perhaps they have first hand experience that EMA is not the most efficient use of govt. money? That is certaintly what I’ve heard from my younger cousins, albeit I aknowledge anecdotal evidence always has to be taken with a pinch of salt.

Interesting to see how this legal case will develop though


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  2. Kelvin John Edge

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  3. Annie Franklin

    Legal action threat at Gove over EMA cuts | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/1BPn8w9 via @libcon hoo-bloody-ray, there is a goddess

  4. Denny

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  5. downinjamaica

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  6. sean gittins

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  7. James Mills

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  8. Save EMA

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  9. Ben Vulliamy

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  10. Sooper8

    RT @libcon Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh
    Good!

  11. Jon Bryan

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh

  12. Daniel Pitt

    Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA desecration http://bit.ly/dSYaCh #ConDemNation

  13. salardeen

    RT @myinfamy: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA desecration http://bit.ly/dSYaCh #ConDemNation

  14. dontspeakforus

    RT @libcon: Legal action threat aimed at Gove over EMA cuts http://bit.ly/dSYaCh





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



17 Comments



83 Comments



204 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» supermarketsweep posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» cjcjc posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve

» Planeshift posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Sheila Taylor posted on Revealed: That 'dossier' on Progress

» Michael Swann posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation