Andy B: MPs should have just one vote
In an interview published today with the Guardian’s Andrew Sparrow, Labour shadow minister Andy Burnham says Labour MPs should have only one vote in the leadership election.
He calls for a full “one member, one vote” electoral system for future leadership contests.
He is the first MP to call for MPs to lose their special privilege since the election of Ed Miliband.
If all ‘one member one vote’ was in operation before the Labour leadership election, Ed Miliband would have still won the leadership battle.
Burnham said he would like to see a system similar to the one used by the Conservative party, with MPs in charge of selecting a shortlist of candidates, but the leader being chosen in a “one member, one vote” election involving the entire party.
Burnham told Andrew Sparrow he wanted the electoral college abolished system abolished. Ed Miliband has tasked Peter Hain to conduct a review of how Labour elects leaders.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
6 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
“Burnham told Andrew Sparrow he wanted the electoral college abolished system abolished. ”
Anyone told the unions yet?
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Andy Burnham: MPs should have only one vote in internal elections http://bit.ly/iaHZqQ
- Liberal Conspiracy
Andy Burnham: MPs should have only one vote in internal elections http://bit.ly/iaHZqQ
- Roxanne Ellis
RT @libcon: Andy Burnham: MPs should have only one vote in internal elections http://bit.ly/iaHZqQ
- Roxanne Ellis
RT @libcon: Andy Burnham: MPs should have only one vote in internal elections http://bit.ly/iaHZqQ
- SEAN
Andy B: MPs should have just one vote | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/8RXAg3y via @libcon
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? |









