Another IDS blunder: cuts hit 1.35m families


by Don Paskini    
November 22, 2010 at 4:37 pm

Iain Duncan Smith’s plans for a ‘Universal Credit’ aim to simplify the benefits system and make sure that people are better off in work. The principle is admirable, but we already know that IDS and his team aren’t very good at the detail of how to implement their ideas.

So it is no surprise to discover that a new report by Family Action estimates that Under the Universal Credit the financial benefits of progressing in work, through increased hours or pay, would be cut for many working families – from allowing them to keep 30p for each additional £1 they earn, to around 24p for each additional pound earned.

Family Action also estimates that as many as 1.35 million households could see work progression incentives cut under the Universal Credit, and that more tax paying, working households in receipt of means tested benefits could lose rather than gain work progression incentives under the new system.

Once childcare costs and council tax benefit are included, Family Action find that under some of the models proposed in the White Paper, calculations suggest that Marginal Deduction Rates could effectively exceed 100% for some families, (meaning claimants would lose money if they worked longer hours).

So despite claims that no one will be worse off as a result of the introduction of Universal Credit, it turns out the government are planning to spend more than £2 billion on setting up a Universal Credit which will actually increase tax rates and decrease incentives to progress in work for more than 1.3 million working families. What an utter fiasco.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Don Paskini is deputy-editor of LC. He also blogs at donpaskini. He is on twitter as @donpaskini
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


23 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


make sure that people are better off in work

Except when they get kicked out of their council house for earning too much.

The problem of high marginal tax rates for people on low incomes is a very serious one and needs to be tackled. Labour didn’t in the 13 years they were running the country, and the Tories and Lib Dems seem intent on making the problem worse, through a mixture of incompetence and malice. The whole lot of ‘em are totally unfit to rule Britain and we’d be better off if they were lined up against a wall and shot.

“Once childcare costs and council tax benefit are included, Family Action find that under some of the models proposed in the White Paper,”

Err, no actually.

Council tax benefit is expressely not included and they haven’t decided what to do about child care costs.

That’s what that report actually says, isn’t it.

“Council tax benefit is expressely not included and they haven’t decided what to do about child care costs.

That’s what that report actually says, isn’t it.”

The white paper sets out possible options on childcare and Family Action’s report models each of them. Government intends that CTB will eventually be included in Universal Credit, though they are in an awful mess on this as their plans to localise CTB go in exactly the opposite direction to the aims of universal credit.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  2. Don Paskini

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  3. Don Paskini

    IDS said no one worse off w his universal credit plans. turns out by "no one", he meant "at least 1,350,000 households" http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  4. MD-G

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  5. Brian Moylan

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q #cuts #cutswatch #ukpolitics #tories #labour

  6. Dave Edwards

    Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://t.co/ZPOzo6E

  7. Rosemary

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  8. Steve Chambers

    RT @snookcocker: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://t.co/ZPOzo6E "lose money if they worked longer hours"

  9. Martin Togher

    RT @snookcocker: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://t.co/ZPOzo6E

  10. North Briton

    RT @snookcocker: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://t.co/ZPOzo6E

  11. Laura Blyth

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  12. Emrys Schoemaker

    RT @donpaskini: IDS said no one worse off w his universal credit plans. turns out "no one", means "at least 1,350,000" http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  13. Elly M

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  14. Rick Dutton

    RT @snookcocker: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://t.co/ZPOzo6E

  15. Nick H.

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  16. Pucci Dellanno

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  17. Loraine Hardy

    Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/Jzq4rbv via @libcon

  18. Jan Bennett

    RT @libcon: Another IDS blunder: reforms to hit 1.35 million households http://bit.ly/cUqB1q

  19. welfarewatch.info :: The “Utter Fiasco” of the Universal Credit :: http://welfarewatch.info/blog

    [...] Read more…   [...]

  20. Matt McG

    http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/11/22/another-ids-blunder-reforms-to-hit-1-35-million-households/





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



17 Comments



83 Comments



204 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation