Apparently Labour factional fighting is back. Or not
One of the worst political predictions of recent years was made by Ed Balls on the morning that Gordon Brown became leader of the Labour Party.
We all got up early that Sunday morning to hold a Fabian fringe before the main event – where Balls expressed relief that Labour had finally been “liberated” from the compelling media and political prism of the Blair v Brown rivalry.
If only it had been true.
Blair-Brown tensions remained a dominant frame for discussion of the Brown government. These were ultimately stabilised as a new Brown-Mandelson rapprochement restored New Labour to its natural unsteady state as a duopoly project in Blair-Brownism, from 1994 to 2007, and again from 2008 to 2010.
Three years on, his Brownite history did a good deal to scupper Ed Balls’ chances of getting a competitive run in the Labour leadership contest.
That Balls ended his unsuccessful campaign with an enhanced reputation, even with many political opponents was largely because he did not run as a Brown continuity candidate, instead establishing his own voice, and reputation as a hammer of the Coalition. (This was one reason why the Ed Miliband campaign quickly discarded the early idea of explicitly pitching a “unity” candidacy as their central narrative).
All of that makes some of the comments quoted Dan Hodges’ feature in this week’s New Statesman suggesting the party may be on the brink of a new round of factional civil war – Ed versus Ed, ex-Brownite versus ex-Brownite no less – very odd indeed.
“Ed Miliband’s team are terrified of Ed Balls and Yvette”, says one Brownite insider. “They think they’re going to come and try to kill him. And the reason they think that is because they will.”
That may be good copy – but it makes no political sense at all.
Whoever may have spoken to Hodges, and from whatever motives, they could hardly have devised comments better designed to be damaging to their supposed beneficiaries (were they to be taken seriously).
This – mainly the obsession with violent killing metaphors – strongly suggests the secret sources are blokes, and indeed blokes’ blokes at that.
I rather suspect Yvette Cooper might want to be a million miles away from such hyper-macho posturing.
Indeed, this may be the daftest point in the full (print edition) piece.
“They’re already organising,” says one shadow minister. “Yvette has been contacting all the teams identifying one member to be her link person. The cover is she’s doing it as part of the women’s brief. But everyone knows she’s building a base.”
Does anyone seriously think its a bad idea to have a link on gender equality in every shadow team? You can’t get much more Old Politics than that.
There isn’t necessarily anything wrong with party pressure groups and informal campaigns pressing on issue or another, or indeed with strands of party opinion and ‘factions’, if factionalism can be avoided.
One good example is Compass and Progress are showing they can work together in campaigning for Labour supporters to vote Yes for the Alternative Vote.
So its not quite death to the factions.
But let’s leave the assassination fantasies to the RSC. And you can certainly forget about a party civil war when nobody has any footsoldiers ready to fight one.
—-
A longer version is at Next Left
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunder Katwala is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is the director of British Future, a think-tank addressing identity and integration, migration and opportunity. He was formerly secretary-general of the Fabian Society.
· Other posts by Sunder Katwala
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Labour party ,Westminster
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
One of the worst mornings of recent years was when Brown became Prime Minister.
And for Ed Balls to say such a thing, well, was simply beyond parody.
And by the way, on the main topic, if something doesn’t exist, generally it isn’t found necessary to deny it!!
“This – mainly the obsession with violent killing metaphors – strongly suggests the secret sources are blokes, and indeed blokes’ blokes at that.”
How thrilling that LC has moved beyond lazy gender stereotypes.
“comments quoted Dan Hodges’ feature ”
Is this the same Dan Hodges who defended Phil Woolas in the grauniad last week?
Indeed, the same one.
Can I just check if the last two comments are making it possible for me to infer Mr Hodges is a Blairite (I think Mr Woolas is regarded as one…)? Or whether that is me being too byzantine with my reasoning?
One thing though – Ms Cooper may or may not like violent language (you should meet an ex-office mate of mine before making a judgement there…) but since the source of the comment was (judging by the quotation marks) the source of the language, how do you know that wasn’t the source’s rationalisation?
Katwala:
This – mainly the obsession with violent killing metaphors – strongly suggests the secret sources are blokes, and indeed blokes’ blokes at that.
I rather suspect Yvette Cooper might want to be a million miles away from such hyper-macho posturing.
Yes, but that doesn’t mean she’d be against an assassination as such, does it?. (Cue ‘Lady Macbeth clichés: ‘Infirm of purpose! Give me the daggers!’) The only way she can be above that kind of thing is by not doing it, not by the language that’s used. Besides, using the f-word about what they’d like to do with Ed would be even more distasteful re. Cooper, even if it fits with ‘blokes’ bloke.’ rhetoric (cf Tarantino, Mamet, geezerati movies).
PS: Sunder – I suspect every other political pundit (and especially the female ones) sees Cooper as the next Labour leader whatever happens in 2015. She’ll just have to get on with her job regardless.
None of the articles I’ve seen by Dan Hodges make much sense.
If there are going to be factions in the Labour Party, they need to be rooted in the the membership and the unions, which the Blairites and Brownites emphatically are not.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Apparently Labour factional fighting is back. Or not http://bit.ly/awEcHC
- conspiracy theo
Apparently Labour factional fighting is back. Or not | Liberal … http://bit.ly/d0Wv7k
- Naadir Jeewa
Reading: Apparently Labour factional fighting is back. Or not: One of the worst political predictions of recent … http://bit.ly/aGmcL6
- Rachel Hubbard
Apparently Labour factional fighting is back. Or not | Liberal Conspiracy: http://bit.ly/aJPpJI via @addthis
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
46 Comments 92 Comments 23 Comments 50 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 23 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Robin Hood: backed by the rich, backed by the rest, says new poll | ToUChstone blog: A public policy blog from the TUC posted on Poll: banks not paying fair share for crisis » Colin Hall posted on Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right » re posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » steveb posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Paul posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Conby posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Jim posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » JC posted on Why Cameron's claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong » pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » D.O posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Briar posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? |










