The Coalition government has made much of its commitment to strengthen Parliament.

So one would think it would want as little as possible to do any massive extension of “Henry VIII” clauses – introducing powers to enables primary legislation to be amended or repealed by ministers, with or without further Parliamentary discussion. (Keen historians may know that this relates to Henry VIII’s Statute of Proclamations of 1539).

Think again.

The Public Bodies Bill – which abolishes as many quangos as possible – gives ministers astonishingly leeway to amend all legislation.

The House of Lords Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee could not be clearer in its latest report that this goes much too far, and would be an important weakening of Parliament.

This Committee was established by the House as a result of “considerable disquiet over the problem of wide and sometimes ill-defined order-making powers which give Ministers unlimited discretion”.[1] The powers in this Bill as it is currently drafted fall into that category. The Committee is instructed by the House in its terms of reference “to report whether the provisions of any bill inappropriately delegate legislative power”.

The Committee considers that the powers contained in clauses 1 to 5 and 11 as they are currently drafted are not appropriate delegations of legislative power. They would grant to Ministers unacceptable discretion to rewrite the statute book, with inadequate parliamentary scrutiny of, and control over, the process

…

The Bill confers powers on Ministers to make very significant changes. All orders under the Bill may amend or repeal any Act of Parliament and are thus Henry VIII powers. Orders under the Bill may even amend or repeal Acts of Parliament which have not yet been passed by Parliament (clause 27(2)).

The exercise of those powers is in each case made subject to the affirmative procedure. But that procedure cannot in any circumstances be regarded as a substitute for a bill, for two reasons in particular. First, as is normal with secondary legislation, the orders are considered only once and are unamendable, however much material the order contains. Second, in practice, it is very rare for either House to vote down subordinate legislation, whatever its concerns about them.

Indeed, no such instrument has been voted down by the Commons since 1969 – over forty years – as Stephen Gummer reported on LabourList.

Reader comments

1. Liberal Conspiracy

   Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

2. Steve Gardiner

   RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

3. Aegir Hallmundur

   Coalition carries on where Labour left off. RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

4. Unity

   RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

5. Allan Siegel

   RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

6. James Smith

   Oh dear. The Public Bodies Bill looks like it might be the LRRA all over again… http://is.gd/hiaIZ.

7. Tim Duckett

   RT @Floppy: Oh dear. Looks like it might be the LRRA all over again… http://is.gd/hiaIZ <– Meet the new boss, same as the old boss…

8. Paul Evans

   Coalition wants powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/bA8FB2 Another incredibly odd thing for #libdems to be relaxed about

9. Luke Walter

   RT @aegirthor: Coalition carries on where Labour left off. RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

10. Pucci Dellanno

    RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

11. conspiracy theo

    Coalition wants powers to weaken Parliament | Liberal Conspiracy http://bit.ly/dBjN4j

12. Nick H.

    RT @libcon: Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

13. Wendy Maddox

    They're up to something!! : RT @libcon: Coalition wants powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5

14. English Cynic

    Coalition wants powers to weaken Parliament | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/cL8TDr1 via @libcon

15. George Wilson

    RT: @libcon Coalition wants new powers to weaken Parliament http://bit.ly/92VZp5 – v interesting – will read up what others think about this

16. The Abolition of Parliament Bill

    [...] Now it would seem that the same provisions are back, under the guise of the Public Bodies Bill. [...]

17. The Abolition of Parliament Bill - PPRuNe Forums

    [...] [...]

18. Abolition of Parliament: it was wrong then and it’s wrong now

    [...] heavily criticised by a Lords committee and the issue picked up by some bloggers so far, including Liberal Conspiracy: The Public Bodies Bill – which abolishes as many quangos as possible – gives ministers [...]