That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending
Over at the Financial Times, Gavyn Davies blows a hole in the argument that today’s GDP growth figures support Coalition policy:
Consequently, all we know from today’s data is how the 3.2 per cent growth rate breaks down into output sectors. This is where the numbers look somewhat less encouraging, because they have been substantially boosted by strong growth in public construction projects – a sector of the economy which is about to contract quite sharply.
Construction output grew by 4.0 per cent in Q3, and this alone added 0.25 per cent to the level of output during the quarter, or 1.0 per cent to the annualised growth rate of the economy. Much of this came in the public sector, due in part to the lagged effects of Labour’s stimulus packages, and in part to a catch-up from the exceptionally bad weather in Q1.
Unfortunately, we can already see that this boost will be temporary, because construction orders have now turned negative. In fact, it would not be too surprising if this sector drags down GDP growth by around 0.5-1.0 per cent in coming quarters, thus eliminating much of the boost we have seen in the past two quarters.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
36 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
I think you have an unintended double negative in your opening sentence there, but by all means leave it in 
But it is true that there is a lot of lag in government policy, and a fair amount of lag in growth statistics. But doesn’t this mean if you wait for 4 quarters of growth – which we now have – before dealing with the deficit, there will be probably 7 or 8 quarters of growth before policy has any effect? That starts to become quite a long way towards when the next recession is due anyway in a normal boom bust cycle, which wasn’t abolished after all. And that’s just following Labour’s policy of starting the cuts with this month’s spending review. Follow Balls’ denialism, and we’ll be most of the way to the next recession before we’ve started to deal with the fiscal legacy of the last one.
Hah! thanks for spotting that Joe – I wrote this in a hurry. Now updated.
to answer your point: Follow Balls’ denialism, and we’ll be most of the way to the next recession before we’ve started to deal with the fiscal legacy of the last one.
I think you’ll soon be praying for Balls’ so-called ‘denialism’ when it becomes clear that magic fairies are not going to usher in a new era of job creation anytime soon.
Labour’s argument in sum:
1) We have growth, thank Labour
2) It’s not as high as last quarter, blame the Tories.
Sonny
once again – as last week – you seem to be confused. The article says that 0.25% of the 0.8% was from construction, and baldly states – without supporting data – that “MUCH of this came in the public sector, due IN PART to to the lagged effects of the Labout stimulus package…” well even if this is correct, and even if ALL of the .25% was due to the public sector and if ALL of that was dure to Labours stimulus, neither of which is the case – that would still not be MOSTLY – it would be 32% – of the growth. So your conclusion- header of your blog – is not in fact supported by the article .
saludos
Michael Clancy
I wonder what the story would have been had growth been poor – no doubt it’d have been the Tories fault eh?
It’s always same when economic figures come, whether Tory or Labour – poor figures were to be blamed on the other side, good figures to be praised on your side. It gets a little old after a while.
Why can’t we just be happy there’s growth? That’s good news – that means more jobs, more money, more chances for the poor. Who cares who should get the credit?
Michael Clancy,
I’m afraid your understanding of the figures falls quite short of a proper economic analysis. To restrict the effects of Labour stimulus spending to the 32% which can be directly attributed to that spending is to ignore the interdependent nature of growth in different sectors, particularly in terms of consumer and business confidence.
Mark
this may be true, and worth a thesis in itself, but i am merely correcting sunnys incorrect missapplication of the facts in Gavyn Davis’ piece
Michael
Basic economics doesn’t require a thesis.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Hazico_Jo
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Simon HB
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Jeevan Rai
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Derek Bryant
RT @libcon That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Brian Moylan
That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/D1ML3KA via @libcon
- Melissa Nicole Harry
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Paul Crowley
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Lindsey Millen
RT @DerekJohnBryant: RT @libcon That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Sue Pellegrino
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Paul Hufton
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Malcolm Evison
That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending | Liberal Conspiracy: http://bit.ly/99LBvz via @addthis
- sunny hundal
Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- Press Not Sorry
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- Walton Pantland
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- Jason Mcintyre
RT @sinnaluvva: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending | Liberal Conspiracy: http://bit.ly/99LBvz via @addthis
- Rizzy
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- GuyAitchison
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- Rachel Hardy
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- conspiracy theo
That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending | Liberal Conspiracy http://bit.ly/d6jvoi
- Will Cameron
RT @sunny_hundal Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came frm Labour stimulus spending http://j.mp/9cxR6a Hear that from Labour leaders
- Naadir Jeewa
Reading: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending: Over at the Financial Times, Gavyn Davies blows a hole in t… http://bit.ly/cK8ug8
- Max Joseph
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- Finola Kerrigan
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
- amonthofMAIL
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- Pucci Dellanno
RT @libcon: That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour stimulus spending http://bit.ly/av8h1h
- andrew
That GDP growth? Mostly from Labour spending | Liberal Conspiracy: RT @sinnaluvva: That GDP growth? Mostly from La… http://bit.ly/agNjaE
- gwyn bailey
RT @sunny_hundal: Today's much trumpeted GDP growth mostly came from Labour stimulus spending. http://t.co/dWLLVQK
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
 |
LATEST COMMENTS » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |
