Coalition approval falls sharply to -4%
YouGov’s daily tracker of the Coalition’s approval rating yesterday dove sharply to -4% (approve 38%, disapprove 42%).
Voting intentions were at: Con 43%, Lab 37%, LD 12%
It’s the first time that the Coalition’s negative rating has fallen beyond the 3% margin of error.

And yet not a single media outlet or right-winger is asking whether the Coalition has over-reached itself and is turning of independent voters. Bizarre, they seem to do that quickly for their political opposition.
Conservative voters have broadly remained loyal to the government’s ideological agenda.
It’s the Libdems who keep bleeding support. Which begs another question: at what point do they accept something needs to be done to rescue their own electoral position?
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
22 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Maybe Labour should remain leaderless if the coalition is going to lose support so easily… And bear in mind we have the “spending” review (Newspeak lives!) coming up in October – the Gov benches should be worried.
Worth noting that voting intention for Conservatives remains significantly high though. It may be that some of those not approving of the coalition are not the central ground floating voters, or Conservative-Labour switchers, but supporters of the coalition parties who do not like the combined policies, but will support their normal party’s ‘undiluted’ platform.
Also worth remembering that come an election, the government’s share of the vote normally increases. So this is not great news for Labour (yet – it is trending in that way, but trends can change).
This is interesting. I think the data set is a little too short to draw any major conclusions (yet), but if the trend continues it could spell trouble for the Tories.
“It’s the Libdems who keep bleeding support. Which begs another question: at what point do they accept something needs to be done to rescue their own electoral position?”
I think there is a very real possibility that the Lib Dems will be almost completely wiped out by the time the next election comes around. A local (well, to me) councillor has already crossed the floor:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-merseyside-11069322
The Liberals have traditionally been strong in Liverpool, but the impact of ‘austerity’ measures (which will hit people on Merseyside harder than most) could turn thousands of votes away.
And a good thing too (in my opinion).
You have a funny definition of bleeding support, they’ve been at 12% or thereabouts for a month.
I’m guessing that “-4%” makes for a better headline than “38%”?
Lee – unfortunately you’re reading the polls badly.
The polls look at how people who describe themselves as voters, affiliated to a particular party, will vote. So the poll of self-described Libdem voters could become smaller while support for Libdems within that pool remains static. That is what’s happening here – The Libdems are bleeding support but of the people who remain, the support remains static.
Have a look back through Peter Kellner’s commentaries and he expands on this. Broadly though, the line of LD voters is going downwards. Check the other graph on the page linked
Conservatives on 43% though – a rating not Labour has not seen from YouGov since 2002, apart from a brief spell just before Brown’s election that never was.
One can only surmise that it is the Coalition only that is unpopular, rather than the Tories.
“Also worth remembering that come an election, the government’s share of the vote normally increases.”
That has almost always been the case, yes. But only when comparing from mid-term; there’s very little that can be projected (either way) from polling figures this early into a parliament.
Sunny, you’re taking a poll projection, the entirety of it’s being aimed at working out the national mood, and claiming that lib dem support is dropping when clearly isn’t. There’s nothing else to read.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- MyDavidCameron
RT @libcon Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://t.co/40LQ2Bo
- AdamRamsay
RT @libcon Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- Derek Bryant
RT @libcon Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- Max
RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- Tam Chandler
RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- paulstpancras
RT @MaximManchester: RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- earwicga
RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- Stuart Vallantine
RT @DerekJohnBryant: RT @libcon Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- andy jackson
@libcon http://t.co/fEAZTNO
- NewLeftProject
RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- SSP Campsie
RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
- SMS PolicyWatch
RT @libcon: Coalition approval falls sharply to -4% http://bit.ly/bVtGx7
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
5 Comments 15 Comments 17 Comments 26 Comments 42 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » BenSix posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships » Have Labour realised the election is more than three years away? | My Blog posted on Labour's wonks are becoming part of the problem » Owen Blacker posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Richard Blogger posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Daniel Henry posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » nonny mouse posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Socrates posted on Dorries says Osborne wanted Lansley "shot" » Bloody Yank posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Bloody Yank posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Robin Levett posted on An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs » kernowjim posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » ROFLMFAO posted on Fabians change policy on unpaid internships » Cherub posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » jojo posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction » Sun journos nicked in hack enquiry shocker « andrew henley posted on Venables journo has manslaughter conviction |








