Spectator & Pollard apologise over libel


11:15 am - August 28th 2010

by Newswire    


      Share on Tumblr

The Spectator magazine publishes this today:

Stephen Pollard and the Spectator apologise for the unintended and false suggestion in a blog published on 15 July 2008 that Islam Expo Limited is a fascist party dedicated to genocide which organised a conference with a racist and genocidal programme. We accept that Islam Expo’s purpose is to provide a neutral and broad-based platform for debate on issues relating to Muslims and Islam.

It has also published an unrelated apology on the same day regarding this:

The Spectator apologises to Professor Moore for certain postings by contributors using pseudonyms “CWBPI” and “Michael” under our “Questioning the Aids Consensus” blog in October 2009. The comments were removed following a complaint by Professor Moore. We are happy to accept that these comments were both abusive and untrue. The Spectator has agreed to make a donation to a HIV/AIDS charity.

Regarding the first apology, a press release by Islam Expo states:

On 15 July 2008, the Spectator website published an article by Stephen Pollard (editor of the Jewish Chronicle) entitled “Demos and Genocide”. That article unfairly and falsely referred to Islam Expo as a racist, fascist and genocidal organisation. As is well-known, we at Islam Expo host exhibitions which explore a wide range of issues relating to Islam and Muslims and which seek not only to educate visitors about the positive and progressive aspects of this religion, but also to provide a neutral and all-inclusive platform in which people of all races, religions and viewpoints can gather to discuss topics relating to Islam without fear of reprisal or restriction. The Directors and organisers of Islam Expo had worked, and continue to work, hard to establish a good reputation for providing a venue where people can attend our events and debate openly, building an understanding and mutual tolerance. These events are also attended by a wide range of leading academics, politicians and journalists.

Islam Expo was therefore justifiably outraged and dismayed to learn that we had been referred to in this way. As neither Mr Pollard nor the Spectator agreed to our initial request for an apology, we had no option but to seek vindication via litigation.

It’s also worth noting that Stephen Pollard referred to material first published on the Harry’s Place blog in that post.

The Judgement is here (via Chris Brooke)

via @earwicga

    Share on Tumblr   submit to reddit  


About the author

· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments



Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Spectator & Stephen Pollard apologise over libel case http://bit.ly/cgFX80

  2. Chris Brooke

    @libcon Re Pollard & Spectator, the high court judgment is here: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/QB/2010/2011.html http://bit.ly/cgFX80

  3. Naadir Jeewa

    Reading: Spectator & Pollard apologise over libel: The Spectator magazine publishes this today:
    Stephen Pollard a… http://bit.ly/cgNkpC

  4. Kate Sutherland

    Spectator & Pollard apologise over #libel | Liberal Conspiracy http://bit.ly/94V27z





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.