Published: August 26th 2010 - at 2:12 pm

Fox rejects ad referring to Murdoch’s $1m gift


by Sunny Hundal    

Rupert Murdoch’s News Corporation, the parent company for Fox News, recently made a $1 million contribution to the Republican Governors Association, a partisan group planning to help Republican campaigns.

Facing criticism, News Corp. responded by citing their support for the RGA’s “pro-business agenda”.

Progressive media watchdog group Media Matters responded by creating an ad critical of the donation, and requested airtime during The O’Reilly Factor on Fox News to broadcast the spot.

But according to HuffPo – they rejected the ad for spurious reasons.

None of the UK-owned News International media outlets reported on the donation either.


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


From the Huffington Post article linked:

Rabin-Havt told the Huffington Post that they refused to change the message to be from Media Matters, since it’s a message in the words of a News Corp. executive. So as a compromise, the group changed it to, “And now, a special message that Fox News’ primetime hosts refuse to tell you, brought to you by Media Matters,” which is technically correct, since no primetime hosts have mentioned the donation. Media Matters did make the change, noting it was interesting that Fox News is now on record saying News Corp. opposes “Democratic candidates.”

The original advert claimed to be a message from Fox News, to which Newscorp quite reasonably requested that the organisation sponsoring the message identify themselves as so doing. Media Matters response was to ask Fox News to run an advert which starts by implying that Fox News was keeping information from its viewers (as it happens, true, but not a commercially acceptable practice for a news channel I’d have thought). So basically Media Matters were asked to identify the makers of the advert as themselves not Fox News, and responded by using a line that implies the broadcaster they sought to air the advert on was not trustworthy. I can see why that might not be aired.

There was one factual clarification also, which seems fine.

None of this excuses the problem of a major media corporation sponsoring one political point of view, but since Fox claimed to be happy to run the advert with two minor changes, and Media Matters refused to make one change and dickishly used an alternative wording which would guarantee it would not get broadcast, I don’t think we can really see censorship here. The sort of worrying links between media and politics we could do without maybe, but if this was an attempt at censorship Fox are really bad at it.

Just another example of the fake freedom the right claims to support.

And these are the clowns who think we should desroy the BBC, and replace it with corporations like them.

FOX NEWS “You are free do do whatever we say so.”


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Fox rejects ad referring to Murdoch's $1m donation http://bit.ly/aryuhD

  2. Derek Bryant

    RT @libcon Fox rejects ad referring to Murdoch's $1m donation http://bit.ly/aryuhD

  3. EdH

    RT @libcon: Fox rejects ad referring to Murdoch's $1m donation http://bit.ly/aryuhD

  4. Welsh Ramblings

    Is the USA really a full democracy? RT @libcon Fox rejects ad referring to Murdoch's $1m donation http://bit.ly/aryuhD





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS






43 Comments



91 Comments



23 Comments



50 Comments



10 Comments



26 Comments



22 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Jim posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» JC posted on Why Cameron's claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong

» pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Briar posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» Eddy Cool posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Amanda posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Chloe posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Zoroaster posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» David Irvine posted on By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters