NS endorses Ed M; Cruddas backs David
The edition of New Statesman tomorrow will endorse Ed Miliband as Labour leader.
Update: The leader has been published on the New Statesman website – but here are a few highlights:
—
Why Ed Miliband should be the next Labour leader
Many of our readers despair of Labour and will never forgive the authoritarian tendencies of Tony Blair, or how he allowed the party to be drawn into a fatal and militaristic alliance with the neoconservatives of the Bush administration. Nor will they forgive the neoliberal market dogmatism that resulted in the British economy becoming so unbalanced and so over-reliant on reckless financiers. We empathise with them.
…
Indeed, there are many aspects of the coalition government’s programme of which we approve, notably its commitment to constitutional reform and enhanced civil liberties, and the willingness of the Work and Pensions Secretary, Iain Duncan Smith, to make poverty and dispossession a defining issue of our political discourse. Yet we still believe that Labour is the party that offers the best hope of achieving the progressive transformation of British society that we seek, perhaps one day in coalition with the Liberal Democrats.
…
Now, slowly, we are witnessing the first signs of renewal. There has been a preparedness to admit mistakes and ask painful questions about why so many of its natural supporters ended up feeling so betrayed by or isolated from Labour. So far, of all the candidates, it is Ed Miliband who has been most prepared to challenge New Labour orthodoxies, to use a different kind of language. He advocates a Labour agenda that is confident, forceful and empowering, committed to greater freedom, social justice and, above all else, reducing inequality.
The primary task of the next Labour leader has to be to develop a political economy that addresses the fundamental inequalities and inequities that have blighted British society for so long – and which will only worsen as the Con-Lib coalition’s doctrinaire spending cuts begin to bite. To talk of tackling social mobility, as coalition ministers do, without addressing the ever-widening gap between rich and poor, is disingenuous. The fight for a more equal society has to become a priority again and Ed Miliband understands this (see his column on page 21).
…
Voting begins on 1 September and we urge all undecided MPs and MEPs, and Labour Party and trade union members, to vote for Ed Miliband. He is the “change candidate” who has the greatest potential to connect with a wider electorate and especially with those politically engaged young people, internationalist in outlook, who have lost faith in conventional Westminster politics but yearn for a more democratic, fairer and freer Britain. Labour needs a bold, charismatic, compassionate and visionary leader to renew the party and begin the journey back to government. Ed Miliband has shown us he could be that leader.
————
Update: The magazine also reports that Jon Cruddas has officially come out to support David Miliband:
“I’m endorsing David,” Cruddas says now, “because of a couple of contributions he has made – one was the column on Englishness he wrote in your magazine [in our 5 July issue]. Another was his Keir Hardie Memorial Lecture [on 9 July]. What was interesting to me about this was when he started talking about belonging and neighbourliness and community, more communitarian politics, which is where I think Labour has to go.
He’s the only one [of the leadership contenders] that has got into some of that. He’s tackling some of more profound questions that need to be addressed head-on. What is the nature of the reckoning? We should not just be running from the record but having a nuanced approach to some of the things that went wrong, as well as defending the things that went right.”
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
11 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Well I back him above his brother. David was too close to New Labour and has not shown any regrets for that.
It’s best to ignore the NS on this topic – it thought Gordon Brown would be a splendid leader….
sally @1
better than that, David said that Labour should not drift into it’s “left wing comfort zone” and, thus, will not under his leadership. We’re all bourgeois now…
“It’s best to ignore the NS on this topic – it thought Gordon Brown would be a splendid leader….”
So did most of the country judging by opinion polls when Gordon Brown bottled calling an election in 2007.
Ed is gonna get my vote.
Hate to be rude as you know, but does it really matter who these mainstream rags back anymore? The Guardian demonstrated, unfortunately, its complete lack of influence when it threw its lot in with Clegg. The Sun failed to get Cameron over the line. It may be that the day of the sort of influence we’ve seen in the past is fading very fast.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
New Statesman endorses Ed Miliband – we have the full leader http://bit.ly/bXI03j
- John West
RT @libcon: New Statesman endorses Ed Miliband – we have the full leader http://bit.ly/bXI03j
- Manu Ekanayake
RT @libcon: New Statesman endorses Ed Miliband – we have the full leader http://bit.ly/bXI03j
- Dave Howard
The New Statesman will tomorrow endorse Ed Miliband as Labour leader: http://bit.ly/bIkq56
- Naadir Jeewa
Reading: New Statesman endorses Ed Miliband: The edition of New Statesman tomorrow will endorse Ed Miliband as Lab… http://bit.ly/cm7DgW
- Lee Durbin
RT @libcon: New Statesman endorses Ed Miliband http://bit.ly/bXI03j <- between this & Cruddas's move, seems like genuine debate might occur
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Bob B posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









