ConHome not on-message with Coalition


by Left Outside    
August 22, 2010 at 11:15 am

After hailing the Coalition’s radicalism, even with caveats, you would think that Conservative Home would remain fairly friendly towards the Liberal Democrats. Judging from the below image, I think somebody needs to inform the admins of Conservative Home’s McCarthyist Left Watch.

In a typically asinine post Jonathan Isaby declares “The Green Party now wants to restrict my freedom of choice and stop me eating meat.” Was this a new manifesto promise? Nope, just a proposition for Meat Free Mondays:

Quite simply, the party’s leader and sole MP, Caroline Lucas, wants to ban me and everyone else working on the parliamentary estate from being able to eat meat on Mondays. She has written to the parliamentary catering authorities asking them to provide, on one day a week, “a totally animal-free menu in order to help tackle the world’s environmental and other problems”.

The attempt to change the menu of a private establishment through writing to someone hardly merits accusations of being “uncuddly, far-left, statist and authoritarian” in my book, but that is Isaby for you.

What caught my eye was the rather fetching “Left Watch” motif running across the top of the page – I’m sure the Tory’s coalition partners will just love it too.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Left Outside is a regular contributor to LC. He blogs here and tweets here. From October 2010 to September 2012 he is reading for an MSc in Global History at the London School of Economics and will be one of those metropolitan elite you read so much about.
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


12 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


If someone tried to tell me I couldn’t eat meat on Mondays I’d be b***** annoyed!

richard (or dick should i call you) ,is anyone telling you you CAN’T eat meat? is it a law? typical knocking down straw men

Someone might want to point out to Mr. Isaby that there are in fact places to get your lunch from outside the Parliamentary estate as well. Like, for example, a Tesco’s ministore on the corner of the block of Portcullis House?

Having met him it would be most ungallant of me to point out that perhaps tottering off for, ooooh, two hundred yards or so to pick up a few hundred calories might not actually be all that bad an idea for him.

I am sure that LibDems welcome the fact that ConHome is maintaining its antagonism towards the party. If ConHome fell in love with the LibDems, the latter would have something quite serious to worry about.

Likewise, I expect that the liberal wing of the Conservative party use ConHome as a barometer of illiberalism. If a coalition measure upsets the ConHome team, it is probably the correct thing to do.

Obviously banning eating meat would be terribly illiberal. However, the only similar illiberal measure I can think of is when the Conservative party tried to ban types of music in the 1990s. They enacted the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, with the intention of banning raves and defined the music played at a rave as:

“music” includes sounds wholly or predominantly characterised by the emission of a succession of repetitive beats.
–Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994[10]

Sections 63, 64 & 65 of the Act targeted electronic dance music played at raves. The Criminal Justice and Public Order Act empowered police to stop a rave in the open air when a hundred or more people are attending, or where two or more are making preparations for a rave. Section 65 allows any uniformed constable who believes a person is on their way to a rave within a five-mile radius to stop them and direct them away from the area.

I guess this explains why the conservatives don’t like Jamie Oliver either. They just hate being told what’s good for them?

Still, I’m a bit disappointed in Caroline Lucas. Surely she’s got better things to fill her time with than worrying about the menu provided at what’s essentially a private member’s club? So long as there’s a meat-free option, it’s all good, right?

Meat Free Monday is a campaign I think to get everyone to have one day a week meat free. As a big portion of her supporters are veggies I don’t see taking 5 minutes out of her day to write to someone as a large imposition on Lucas’s time.

Silly season stuff from Isaby, 90% of the ConHome commenters lapped it up sadly. Nothing banned, just recommendations on the menu and it provokes this shit storm.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    ConHome not on-message with Coalition just yet http://bit.ly/aTojSS

  2. Soho Politico

    Jonathan @Isaby thinks it's an attack on his freedom when restaurants don't serve the food he wants: http://t.co/TdkeCpt via @libcon

  3. Gareth Winchester

    RT @SohoPolitico: Jonathan @Isaby thinks it's an attack on his freedom when restaurants don't serve the food he wants: http://t.co/TdkeCpt via @libcon

  4. Left Outside

    ConHome not on-message with Coalition just yet | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/DvoAcUE via @libcon

  5. ambir

    ConHome not on-message with Coalition http://ff.im/-px8ti





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



16 Comments



83 Comments



203 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Flowerpower posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt

» bluepillnation posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt

» Hannah posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Lee Griffin posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Shatterface posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation