But what about their other controversial appointments?
ConservativeHome reports the CCHQ announcement that controversial former tax exile David Rowland will not now take up the post of Tory party Treasurer.
Rowland now intends to spend more time with his business interests but the right-of-centre blog gives credit where it is due to a highly energetic Daily Mail campaign in derailing Rowland’s hopes of succeeding Michael Ashcroft, the Lord of the blogosphere, in the formal role as Tory treasurer and perhaps as chief source of public controversy over the party’s tax ethics too.
Tim Montgomerie blogs that:
Big questions need to be asked about CCHQ failing to carry out due diligence on this appointment.
Though it may not have taken so much due diligence. At the least, Rowland certainly had enemies in high places, as the enthusiasm of Tory sources for gleefully encouraging the Daily Mail’s scrutiny demonstrated.
My favourite helpful insider’s quote in the Mail’s stories:
‘David Rowland makes Lord Ashcroft seem like a nun,’ said one senior Tory source last night.
But might what is sauce for the Tory goose also apply to the Coalition gander? For the announcement comes amidst much upset among LibDem MPs at the appointment of Sir Phillip Green to advise on deficit reduction efficiencies, for reasons captured succinctly in a carefully legalled Guardian editorial at the weekend.
Sir Philip is also – we must express this with care – a man who is careful to arrange his own finances so as not to needlessly benefit the common weal. In 2005, for example, the man whom Robert Peston dubs both a lovable rogue and the king of jackpot capitalism paid himself a tax-free dividend of £1.2bn from the Arcadia retailing business. Technically the dividend went to his Monaco-resident wife, in order to avoid UK Treasury attention, a tax saving to Sir Philip that has been estimated at £300m. That one dividend payment, as Mr Peston has written, was equivalent to what 54,000 people on average earnings would earn in a year, would build around 10 secondary schools capable of educating some 13,000 young people, or, if paid in an unlikely column of pound coins, would tower 2,350 miles about the Earth’s surface.
There was a Guardian-Mail consensus on this question, with the Mail explicitly linking Cameron’s relationships with both Green and Rowland in its own editorial.
The Guardian editorial also found much to praise in Vince Cable’s earlier comments about Green’s election interventions in the Tory cause. Cable said:
I have no time for billionaire tax dodgers who step off the plane from their tax havens into the country where they make their money and have the effrontery to tell us how to vote and how to run our tax policies. If some of them came onshore and paid their taxes it would make a useful dent in the budget deficit.
Business Secretary Cable was not consulted about Green’s appointment to advise the Coalition, about which he is unsurprisingly far from gruntled.
The Staggers blog quotes LibDem Treasury spokesman Lord Oakeshott making what all will agree is surely an impeccable point for any government concerned with deficit reduction:
Lord Oakeshott, the Lib Dem Treasury spokesman, has encouraged the rebels, pointedly noting that: “Governments, like businesses, need to maximise their revenues. Tax cheats and benefits cheats both cost taxpayers dear.”
If Green is planning to step up his civic engagement, perhaps he might now want to apply to be Michael Ashcroft’s successor as Tory Treasurer too.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunder Katwala is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He is secretary-general of the Fabian Society. Also at: Next Left
· Other posts by Sunder Katwala
Filed under
Blog ,Conservative Party ,Westminster
7 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
I’d be interested in asking Sunder if he felt this would increase in either;
a) Cable leaving the coalition govt.?
and/or
b) running for mayor (as many have speculated upon)?
On an unrelated note, I read this again and again – it’s lovely:
“But might what is sauce for the Tory goose also apply to the Coalition gander?”
I’m tickled frankly that someone within CCHQ went for Rowland so aggressively.
“Tim Montgomerie blogs that:
Big questions need to be asked about CCHQ failing to carry out due diligence on this appointment.”
I thought Tim Tory and his mates were always banging on about taking responsibility for your actions. Can’t the tory party ever choose some one who lives and pays taxes here?
About Philip Green.
I seem to be the only person to have read the Guardian’s news report (rather than editorial) on it. He’s been brought in to specifically look at leases and contracts signed since 2007 and evaluate them for value for money.
Now, given that he’s signed more leases and contracts than the rest of us put together have had hot dinners this seems like a reasonable thing to do. Get an expert in value for money on leases to come in and look at value for money on leases.
It’s not as if any of us really believe that all that PFI and the management of the Govt estate (for example, Jack Straw spending more to refurb the Ministry of Justice bldg than it would cost for new build) is all that efficient currently, is it?
Sir Philip is also – we must express this with care – a man who is careful to arrange his own finances so as not to needlessly benefit the common weal.
This is the Guardian that structured its acquisition of EMAP through a Cayman-registered SPV in order not to needlessly benefit the common weal through paying Stamp Duty right? Tch tch.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
But what abouttheir other controversial appointments? http://bit.ly/97u8RA
- Raincoat Optimism
But what about their other controversial appointments? | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/So6foky via @libcon
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pjt posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on YouGov changes that deflate Labour's polling » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Dave posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sally posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Paul posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









