Polls find huge support for protecting services
Labour may have lost the debate on the deficit, for now, but that doesn’t mean people agree with the scale and the type of cuts carried out by the government.
These two graphs were in a big Ipsos-Mori survey of the Coalition’s first 100 days.

Yesterday Ed Balls said:
By cutting the deficit this quickly and this sharply thousands of public and private sector jobs will be lost, the recovery could be stalled and we risk a double-dip recession. George Osborne got the big judgement wrong three years ago when we took action to stop recession turning into depression. He is making the wrong calls again now.
Labour needs strong leadership to set out that there is an alternative based on a clear plan to support jobs and growth, a more sensible timetable for deficit reduction, and a robust explanation of why that will better support our economy and public finances for the long term future of our country.
The polls above show much more support for the stance taken by Ed Balls over that of George Osborne.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
38 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Sunny
Do I have to keep repeating myself about the IPSOS-Mori report? A rudimentary scrutiny will show that the last polling information that is used in it comes from 23-25 July. So instead of being:
The Coalition’s First 100 Days/
The public’s verdict
it should be:
The Coalition’s First 73 Days
Some random statistics from a total of two polls we’re putting out and pretending that makes a trend because we couldn’t find anyone to pay for 100 days survey
I know it’s got lots of pwetty pictures, but it’s basically just touting for trade. Consider who it’s touting for trade to, before you accept its narrative. (I believe all Lib Con comments must contain that word).
I’m not just being picky, it’s important to understand the public’s up to date and actually quite subtle reactions to potential cuts. Those who want to oppose or modify the Osborne-led “the deficit must be destroyed” narrative, need to be able to respond in a way that people can believe. Jumping up and down chanting “no cuts” or saying you’d do the same but with a nicer smile won’t work.
There are first 90-something days polls here:
http://today.yougov.co.uk/sites/today.yougov.co.uk/files/YG-Archives-Pol-Sun-coalition-160810.pdf
and here:
http://www.harrisinteractive.com/europe/news/pubs/7968tab_V2_weighted_130810.pdf
plus the ICM one in today’s Guardian (details should appear today or tomorrow linked from here:
All this shows is that people want an easy life, and don’t like making hard decisions. They want to have their cake and eat it. The tragedy is that there is no effective opposition making a radical case for HOW such services are to be insulated without raising taxes.
The general public are quite adept at saying one thing to pollsters such as that they think cuts should be introduced gradually, or that priority should be given to protecting services for those most in need, and acting in quite a different way when it comes to voting for parties which support such policies.
As even one of the Millibands was forced to admit yesterday on the radio, Labour before the election signally failed to say how they would do things differently… and I’m still waiting to hear how they would!
What’s going on here is a kind of propaganda blowback.
It works like this:
Sunny, Ed Balls and other left activists compose a narrative that says the LibCon coalition is a bunch of ideologically driven heartless bastards who are dead set on slashing frontline services and hurting the most vulnerable.
Then, when market research surfaces showing that the public don’t want valuable frontline services cut and wish to protect the most vulnerable, Sunny and his friends step forward claiming to have won over public support.
The problem is that the Coalition plan explicitly pledged all along to seek to protect the most vulnerable and to target cuts on unnecessary, inefficient or downright foolish areas of spending while protecting vital frontline activities.
Of course, no one wants valuable services cut. Least of all the government. That’s why health spending is ring-fenced and more money will flow directly to schools, bypassing the education bureaucracy. That’s why people who need jobs will be helped to work rather than be imprisoned in the benefits trap.
Update to comment 1 for those who care (ie Sunny Hundal, Don Paskini and me). ICM poll details are now here:
http://www.icmresearch.co.uk/pdfs/2010_august_guardian_august_100days_poll.pdf
Also there’s a new ComRes out for the Mirror:
http://www.comres.co.uk/systems/file_download.aspx?pg=632&ver=2
They often ask different questions or the same question in different ways, but that can be useful. With four different, quite comprehensive polls at the same time, you can look at opinion through the slightly different questions and get a sort of polling 3D effect.
Roger Mexico – there are loads of polls out at the moment. Well done for establishing that. However in order to contradict what is shown in this poll, you’ll actually have to show polls that disagree with the above. Do you have anything?
All this shows is that people want an easy life, and don’t like making hard decisions.
Actually this is bollocks. There are sound economic arguments for doing exactly what the public supports above – and it’s right of Labour to make that case in opposing the Coalition’s cuts.
Call me stupid, but I don’t see the link between the answers given and government policy. Ok, 69% think spending should be cut in a way that protects services, but what percentage think spending is being cut too fast?
All these polls show is that people are like Goldilocks – they don’t want spending cut too fast, they don’t want it cut too slow, they want it just right.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Polls find huge public support for protecting services http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- sunny hundal
Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- Matt Leys
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- John Latham
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- Andy Sutherland
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- AdamRamsay
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- Tam Chandler
RT @libcon: Polls find huge public support for protecting services http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- yorkierosie
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- Nick Watts
RT @libcon: Polls find huge public support for protecting services http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Clare Cochrane
RT @AdamRamsay @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- Gideon Thomas
RT @libcon: Polls find huge public support for protecting services http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Bob Johns
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- Ellie Gellard
Must read! RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b @edballsmp
- Peter Bolton
Polls find huge public support for protecting services | Liberal Conspiracy http://t.co/zHFAMky via @libcon
- Fatbury
RT @BevaniteEllie: Must read! RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b @edballsmp
- Jonathan Davies
RT @libcon Polls find huge public support for protecting services http://bit.ly/aI2I0b #ukpolitics #labour #ConDem
- Chris Paul
RT @BevaniteEllie: Must read! RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b @edballsmp
- Roy Bailey
RT @BevaniteEllie: Must read! RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b @edballsmp
- Nautilus in Red
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b (@edballsmp)
- MervynDinnen
Polls show that majority are NOT behind the scale and type of ConDem cutting http://bit.ly/bBJKma
- Michael Carty
RT @MervynDinnen: Polls show that majority are NOT behind the scale and type of ConDem cutting http://bit.ly/bBJKma
- Elaine Young
RT @MJCarty: RT @MervynDinnen: Polls show that majority are NOT behind the scale and type of ConDem cutting http://bit.ly/bBJKma
- Why Alistair Darling is wrong | Liberal Conspiracy
[...] and the Treasury think that something is important does not mean that the majority of people agree with them. ————————- Share this [...]
- Ed Balls
The road ahead… RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Paul Duxbury
RT @edballsmp: RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Chris Mandella
http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/08/18/polls-find-huge-public-support-for-protecting-services/
- Jos Bell
RT @edballsmp: The road ahead… RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Vivi
RT @edballsmp: The road ahead… RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Vernon Coaker MP
RT @edballsmp: The road ahead… RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Lucy Proctor
RT @edballsmp: The road ahead… RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
- Sandra N.
RT @BevaniteEllie: Must read! RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b @edballsmp
- Johanna Baxter
RT @sunny_hundal: Polls find huge public support for protecting services instead of cutting now: http://bit.ly/aI2I0b
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sheila Taylor posted on Revealed: That 'dossier' on Progress » Michael Swann posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Andreas Moser posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Women are being granted illegal abortions in UK, investigation reveals: TBIJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » LondonJ posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Watchman posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









