Labour must pledge to heal the sickness at the heart of our economy
I once worked at the bank Merrill Lynch. During the tech-boom, one of Merrill’s analysts, Henry Blodget, an expert on technology companies, would write equity research – essentially buy or sell recommendations – that the bank’s stockbrokers would use to recommend securities to their clients.
However, while he was publishing reports saying that certain securities were instant buys, he was also sending internal emails ridiculing what “dogs” they really were. Meanwhile, there was pressure from the retail banking side, which invariably wants to capture cash deposits and provide servces to businesses for large fees.
I saw this often during my time in the City.
In the years since the Big Bang, these practices led to a series of spectacular market failures, with securities vastly overvalued before the market could correct itself. The consequences have been devastating.
Labour’s failure to intervene during its 13 years in power was unforgiveable and a prime reason for their 2010 General Election defeat. Without the banking crisis and recession, the party could still be in government.
Under Labour, the Financial Services Authority was simply not fit for purpose. Bankers I know say duping the FSA is simple – for a number of reasons. The FSA has no systems perspective; it has been too obsessed with small areas and could never see how ridiculous the overall system was becoming.
Second, the bankers are usually brighter and more ingenious than the regulators. Third, the regulatory regime almost forces the FSA into believing that Chinese Walls and the eagerness of bankers to comply with the law will work. That has never happened and it probably never will.
There is no reason for a retail bank to own an investment bank and a stockbroker. Bankers can talk about efficiencies and rationalisation, but all I saw were grotesquely large institutions engaging in self-congratulatory rounds of payouts to senior executives.
It is time to start separating out these entities so they can do what they do best free from the temptation to find shortcuts, and regulate them properly.
We should reverse the Big Bang and split up retail banks, stockbrokers and investment banks. This will end the farcical Chinese Walls and allow for a diverse and competitive City that relies on innovation and quality service to differentiate it from its competitors, not on who can come up with the most elaborate ruse to evade the rules.
Over the past 20 years, we have permitted the creation of a financial sector that is both too big to fail and too big to succeed, and is riven by internal contradictions. We are right to blame the banks for the return to boom and bust after Gordon Brown’s prudent macroeconomic management as Chancellor.
Even having seen the symptoms, Labour was comfortable to sit back and be intensely relaxed about the financial sector.
To regain the trust of the electorate, the party must now apply the same dogged understanding of problems, radicalism of solutions and pragmatism of implementation that is at Labour’s grassroots to the monumental sickness at the heart of the British economy.
—
Originally published in Tribune magazine, which features a longer version
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Imran is an occasional contributor and Labour party activist. He blogs here and is on Twitter here.
· Other posts by Imran Ahmed
Story Filed Under: Blog ,Economy
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
I suspect any such Labour pledge will come too late. This won’t be an issue in five years time because the Coalition will have done at least half of it on their own and the EU and G20 will have filled in the gaps. Bank regulation already feels like yesterday’s story – though I agree there’s more to do. David Davis & his review team came to many of the conclusions you do.
In before a slew of comments ignoring the article in favour of arguing about whether Brown was a prudent chancellor (tip: he wasn’t, it’s not hard to sit on one’s hands during a long boom).
Otherwise, good article. Thanks.
“Labour’s failure to intervene during its 13 years in power was unforgiveable and a prime reason for their 2010 General Election defeat. Without the banking crisis and recession, the party could still be in government”.
Labour didn’t just fail to intervene, it fed the moster with artificially low interest rates and cheap money by the method it used to measure inflation. But without that artificial boom, Labour probably could have been thrown out of power earlier than 2010.
The last ten years have been an economic disaster, mostly because there was an innate belief that all public spending is ‘good’ and that whatever method used to sustain that was a necessary evil at worst. It is this thinking that the Left needs to address.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Labour must pledge to heal the sickness at the heart of our economy http://bit.ly/b7WxBO
- Oliver Cooper
RT @libcon Labour must pledge to heal the sickness at the heart of our economy http://bit.ly/b7WxBO <- They're going to abandon socialism?
- Elly M
RT @libcon: Labour must pledge to heal the sickness at the heart of our economy http://bit.ly/b7WxBO
- Andreas Paterson
RT @libcon: Labour must pledge to heal the sickness at the heart of our economy http://bit.ly/b7WxBO
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
43 Comments 89 Comments 23 Comments 50 Comments 10 Comments 26 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » JC posted on Why Cameron's claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong » pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Briar posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » Amanda posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Chloe posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Zoroaster posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » David Irvine posted on By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters » PaulG posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Victoria Lucas posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » John Ferrier posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother |










