Government is “bullying the vulnerable”
David Cameron’s plans to pay private companies to snoop on benefit claimants have been criticised by East London-based charity Community Links:
Government’s latest wearily predictable spate of bullying the most vulnerable in society for cheap political gain – or ‘cracking down on benefit fraud’ as they prefer to call it – is as tiresome and damaging as ever.
As many have already pointed out, the £5.2bn figure being bandied around is for fraud and error, with error (£3.7bn) far outweighing fraud (£1.5bn). Cameron would claim he has said that all along, but his spin has been enough to deceive the Telegraph, who this morning were claiming that “Mr Cameron discloses that £5.2billion of the £87billion welfare budget is lost to fraudulent claims for tax credit and welfare, while administrative error wastes £1.6billion.”
Secondly, the latest figures I have (for 2006/7) show that 6,756 were successfully prosecuted, a further 12,000 were cautioned, 10,000 received an administrative penalty, 95,000 had their benefit changed but weren’t deemed to have done anything serious enough to warrant any kind of sanction, leaving an enormous 196,000 people who experienced a hugely stressful investigation and were found to have done nothing wrong.
We regularly talk to terrified people who are about to be hauled in front of a Jobcentre advisor and quizzed about their claim. Their only source of income is at risk – that five minute interview could mean the difference between scraping by and being plunge into destitution. And they might only be there because a neighbour has fallen out with them and phoned the benefit fraud hotline, or they had a bit of paint on their hands at their last interview. These advisors, don’t forget, are the same people who are supposed to be supporting people into work.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Don Paskini is deputy-editor of LC. He also blogs at donpaskini. He is on twitter as @donpaskini
· Other posts by Don Paskini
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
I look forward to private Accountancy companies being paid by the govt on a performance related contract going after rich tax evaders. I especially look forward to the govt giving them the powers to go over their finances in minute detail. Following them across the globe, and looking into their various enterprises with a fine tooth comb.
Oh wait, that would be class war, or something.
I look forward to private Accountancy companies being paid by the govt on a performance related contract going after rich tax evaders.
yes me too. The Inland Revenue exert quite a bit of effort on that front, but why not allow private investigators to claim rewards for bringing successful prosecutions for tax evasion.
Luis/Sally,
Not a bad idea developing there. It has incentive (both to seek out tax avoidance and not to commit it) and if it doesn’t work, it costs practically nothing.
Only problem is our old friend civil liberties – companies cannot just go obtaining personal or confidential information in the way the tax office can. Would this actually stop it working as planned?
Only problem is our old friend civil liberties – companies cannot just go obtaining personal or confidential information in the way the tax office can. Would this actually stop it working as planned?
Almost all the relevant information should be publically available from Companies House anyway. The difficulty is finding the people to analyse the accounts in the first place – the best way to hide information is in a whole bunch of other information.
5 – referring to companies rather than individuals there obviously…
6 – maybe paying whistle blowers is an answer
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Don Paskini
RT @libcon: Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Elly M
RT @libcon: Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Tiffany Stecker
RT @libcon Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Don Paskini
@Comm_Links have crossposted your blog to liberal conspiracy http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Claire Butler
RT @libcon Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- LazarouMonkeyTerror
RT @libcon Government criticised for “bullying the vulnerable” http://bit.ly/9nyGSV (shower of millionaire bastards!)
- Mark Best
RT @libcon: Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Chris Preston
It will certainly make a difference to the vast majority of those investigated, who are found to have done nothing wrong: http://is.gd/ebvlQ
- Swamp Thang
RT @libcon: Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- David O'Keefe
RT @libcon: Government criticised for "bullying the vulnerable" http://bit.ly/aoo2oO
- Pamela Heywood
Government is “bullying the vulnerable” http://twurl.nl/h2pra0
- ambir
RT @libcon Government criticised for “bullying the vulnerable” http://bit.ly/9nyGSV
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
28 Comments 72 Comments 21 Comments 49 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » john b posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think » P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem |










