Published: August 6th 2010 - at 9:01 am

Candidates oppose domestic violence law


by Sunny Hundal    

Both David Miliband and Ed Balls said last night they were running campaigns to challenge the Coalition’s recent decision to scrap a scheme to protect women from domestic abuse by removing violent partners from the family homes.

Ed Balls’ team sent out this email:

The Home Secretary Theresa May has slipped out an appalling decision to stop a new scheme to protect women and their children from domestic abuse. People across the country will be shocked by this decision and we have decided to launch a campaign to get it over-turned.

We’re writing to the Home Secretary asking her to think again and let the new scheme go ahead.

Will you sign our letter?

Domestic Violence Protection Orders, which Labour legislated for, give the police the power to ban a violent partner from a family home for two to four weeks. They are aimed at intervening in cases where police are worried about violent behaviour in a home but don’t have enough evidence to bring a criminal charge, or where the victim needs time to recover from the shock of an attack and decide what to do.

David Miliband also launched a campaign from his website, targeting Libdem MP Lynne Featherstone.

Tory Home Secretary Theresa May has announced she will scrap Domestic Violence Protection Orders, a scheme introduced by Labour, which would help the police protect women and children against violence in the home.

Send this letter to her and Lib Dem Lynne Featherstone, Home Office Minister with responsibility for Equality, to show your anger at their callous cuts which will put women in danger. Please feel free to amend the letter to fit your own views on why we must do everything we can to put a stop to domestic violence.

Both initiatives will also be useful in gathering new email addresses for their databases.


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


Call me a cynic Sunny but this

“Both initiatives will also be useful in gathering new email addresses for their databases.”

sums up perfectly for me what this is all about.

If Balls and Miliband had wanted their campaigns to have some impact surely the most effective thing to do would have been to launch a co-ordinated joint campaign, in partnership with women’s organisations and others. But no, they had to turn this into yet another pathetic pissing contest, a cynical attempt to secure the women’s vote in the leadership contest.

I am glad they have put pressure on the government. But in the context of an election campaign of their own, I can’t say I 100% trust they would follow through when in power. If they ever are…

As I write these comments, there is a picture link to LS article reporting the original announcement – “Govt cuts scheme to help women from abuse”. I’m old enough (quite old in fact) to be very cynical about lots of things, and also to be quite picky about how words are put together in the media to give a misleading or even false impression of an event or persons veiw. I think that your headline here is a bit misleading . “candidates oppose domestic violence law”. Really. I thought they were opposing the government decision to cut the “scheme to help women from abuse”.

Cynical I may be – but clearly if Ed Balls is emailing this to people he’s only able to do so because the party database already holds the persons email address. Having received the email (although not necessarily a supporter) I took it to be rather in his shadow cabinet role of (what was) schools and families.

Also not sure how someone emailing May and Featherstone because they have looked at David Milliband’s website provides new email addresses. And anyway, who looks at David Milliband’s website every day? If you hadn’t mentioned it here – who would have known?

#2 They’re both arguing that the government should keep a law introduced by Labour, so I think it’s pretty likely they would “follow through” in this case as a Labour government has already introduced the legislation.

I don’t see why this can’t be both principled opposition to the coalition AND an attempt to build their databases. The two aren’t mutually exclusive.

WTF?

Cath Elliot

If Balls and Miliband had wanted their campaigns to have some impact surely the most effective thing to do would have been to launch a co-ordinated joint campaign, in partnership with women’s organisations and others

——————————————————————————————-

They did that while in Government; it resulted in the Domestic Violence Protection Order.

A shame you can’t support their calls to keep the scheme.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Labour candidates launch campaigns on domestic violence http://bit.ly/bGqMpy

  2. S. Vyers

    Candidates oppose domestic violence law | Liberal Conspiracy http://bit.ly/d15FoC

  3. Fast Online news

    Death toll in Karachi violence hits 81…

    Interesting post. I’ve added a Trackback to it :)





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS






28 Comments



72 Comments



21 Comments



49 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



22 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» john b posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people

» john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think

» P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic"

» Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem