Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it
The full £20bn cost of renewing the UK’s Trident nuclear deterrent must be paid for by the Ministry of Defence, George Osborne has said.
Traditionally, the Treasury has always found the money for the submarines.
The chancellor’s comments come as Defence Secretary Liam Fox warned it would be “very difficult” to maintain other MoD projects if more than half its budget went on funding Trident.
BBC’s Jonathan Beale said Mr Osborne risked igniting a political row.
The remarks come as the MoD is having to contemplate cuts in its budget of between 10% and 20%.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Good.
If Trident has to compete with the rest of the defence budget, we can finally have the Ends/Ways/Means and Value for Money discussions which should always have been involved in any decision to replace Trident/Vanguard (and, indeed, in any decision to maintain a nuclear deterrent).
Would the cash-rich Chinese be interested in buying ALL the Trident kit and the aircraft carriers?
Remember that you read it here first!
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it http://bit.ly/93IypD
- Dave Harris
Cat, meet the pigeons RT @libcon Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it http://bit.ly/93IypD
- Emma Just Emma
Lets just scrap it and spend defence money more efficiently. RT @libcon: Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it http://bit.ly/93IypD
- Gareth Winchester
RT @libcon Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it http://bit.ly/bS7Vqh <- How to scrap summat while giving the impression otherwise…
- Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it | Liberal Conspiracy : Best Mod . com
[...] The chancellor’s comments come as Defence Secretary Liam Fox warned it would be “very difficult” to maintain other MoD projects if more than half its budget went on funding Trident. See original here: Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it | Liberal Conspiracy [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
28 Comments 72 Comments 21 Comments 49 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » john b posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think » P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem |










