How Ken will use economy to attack Boris
Ken Livingstone yesterday laid out a somewhat detailed economic policy in which he explained how he would challenge Boris Johnson’s administration, and the issues his campaign would highlight.
He said he was “setting out an alternative approach to protect Londoners”, calling the policy: Defending London’s Living Standards and Economy from the Tories.
On London’s economy the document points out:
* London’s unemployment rate (9.3%) is above the national average (7.9%). The economic inactivity rate in London is 23.7%, which is the worst inactivity rate in the whole of England;
* The need for greater engagement with major economies including India, China and Brazil and the damage caused by Tory government cuts on falling levels of public and private investment in London;
* The mounting cost to Londoners of Boris Johnson’s inaction on issues such as pollution and his vanity projects including the fantasy Thames airport and new bus (over £500 million).
His campaign made several pledges:
1. Holding down bus fares, following a rise in the cost of a single bus fare by a third under Boris Johnson – delivering the lowest possible fares is the biggest contribution that the Mayor can make to protecting Londoners living standards against the effects of the recession;
2. Making the Living Wage a condition of procurement, employment and services within the GLA group and ODA and using every lever to convince London employers to implement the Living Wage;
3. Building a new consensus across London for new infrastructure projects to improve the quality of life in London and create new jobs;
4. Opposing Tory-Lib Dem plans to privatise the Royal Mail and cut housing benefit which threatens thousands of Londoners.
5. Lobbying for a fair taxation system, rejecting Tory calls to lower the top rate of tax to 40%.
He said he was calling for a shift in priorities “from defending bankers’ bonuses” to “defending Londoners from cuts and investing in new jobs”.
I believe it is essential that the Mayor uses every lever to convince London employers to implement the Living Wage and make the Living Wage a condition of procurement, employment and services.
Whilst Boris awards pay hikes to his staff and regards his £250,000 a year salary from the Telegraph as ‘chickenfeed’ millions of Londoners are struggling to make ends meet and need a Mayor who will fight for them.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Thanks for reproducing the press release.
Remind us what happened to fares under KL?
@ 1
Quite. And perhaps even more pertinent – what happened to fares under Boris? The extension of the Oystercard to overland trains resulted in a 30% reduction in fares on many routes.
So 5 pledges.
1 is a pledge to raise fares as little as possible, so does not really mean much. I think you may find all mayoral candidates sign up to this anyway.
2 is a committment to make things more expensive for London government spending (I am not commenting whether it is fair or not). It does not really work well with 1.
3 sounds expensive, but means nothing without some substance. It’s hardly as if London doesn’t have infrastructure projects at the moment, so where is the new money coming from?
4&5 are national political issues, over which Mr Livingstone has no control.
I note there is no attempt here to deal with the criticisms of Mr Livingstone’s administration which were aired at the last elections, although surely that would be a useful thing to try and disarm.
“The economic inactivity rate in London is 23.7%, which is the worst inactivity rate in the whole of England”
Many of those “economically inactive” people are called ‘mothers’.
There is no question that Boris has had a slow start – he probably doesn’t have the tools yet to act effectively.
But the Oyster card extension and the bike scheme are serious in roads into making London a better place to travel.
I am a fan of Ken, but I see nothing substantial in his pledges to keep the ball rolling for London. Ken needs to credit what Boris has done to sustain Kens original good initiatives, while coming through with more plans. And possibly stop this “its me against the world” lark.
@ Laban
Many of those “economically inactive” people are called ‘mothers’.
Good point. Others are called students, retired etc.
Laban and Cat
#Many of those “economically inactive” people are called ‘mothers’
They don’t have mothers or retired people in Paris or Berlin then.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
How Ken will use economy to attack Boris http://bit.ly/d7cGgx
- John Halton
Reading Ken's economic policy for London makes me glad our CLP backed him rather than Oona. Good stuff: http://bit.ly/9ftvQU #yesweken
- Ken Livingstone Team
RT @libcon: How Ken will use economy to attack Boris http://bit.ly/d7cGgx
- 0-i biz
How Ken will use economy to attack Boris | Liberal Conspiracy http://bit.ly/bKtN6u
- For Free
How Ken will use economy to attack Boris | Liberal Conspiracy http://bit.ly/bKtN6u
- Ken versus Oona « Raincoat Optimism
[...] 8.7%. ReutersAn error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later. Liberal ConspiracyHow Ken will use economy to attack Boris July 29, 2010 Sunny HundalWhy does Nick Clegg keep misleading us about the economy? July 29, 2010So [...]
- tonya streeper
How Ken will use economy to attack Boris | Liberal Conspiracy: How Ken will use economy to attack Boris. by Sunny … http://bit.ly/bKtN6u
- Brian Vinay
How Ken will use economy to attack Boris | Liberal Conspiracy: The need for greater engagement with major economie… http://bit.ly/auNeFh
- Cat Smith
RT @johnhalton: Reading Ken's economic policy for London makes me glad our CLP backed him rather than Oona. Good stuff: http://bit.ly/9ftvQU #yesweken
- Edward Mann
RT @libcon How Ken will use economy to attack Boris http://bit.ly/d7cGgx <Glorious stupidity, nicely nailed by the comments!
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
28 Comments 72 Comments 21 Comments 49 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » john b posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think » P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem |










