Ed Miliband hints at gay marriage support too
Ed Miliband is also finally coming around.
OIn Twitter yesterday he said:
@JaeKay Got asked abt this today &made clear I support principle of gay marriage. Need to consult on how to implement.
This is not an unreasonable position.
The ‘problem’ as such with gay marriage might be technical and legal rather than than simply procedural.
In other words, how does the government allow the flexibility for some Churches to sanction gay marriage but others not – while not falling foul of equality laws?
Labour MP Kerry McCarthy wrote about this in January:
Civil partnerships are not the same as marriage. And we won’t have true equality until they are. I’ve tried looking into this, and the explanation I got as to why the UK hasn’t gone down the path of other countries who have legalised gay marriage was that it’s more difficult in the UK because whereas in those countries you can only be married in a civil ceremony and can then choose to go on and have a religious service should you want one, in the UK you can be married in church without the civil element. Which I took to mean that you couldn’t have gay marriage in this country without persuading the Church of England, Catholic church, etc, to accept it.
So it looks like Ed Miliband is also coming around to gay marriage, it’s just a matter of ensuring how it would be implemented and how the law could work. Perhaps. Nevertheless, it’s an encouraging sign.
I’ll try and find out more directly from the campaign next week.
Via @earwicga – who has a report on her blog about an event with Ed Miliband locally.
Why it became Michael Gove’s awful month
The surprising thing about Michael Gove’s short tenure as Education Secretary is how quickly an appointment which began with such hype and bluster has descended into one of hubris and error.
The controversies Gove has been embroiled in since May have been entirely unforced errors; it is not beyond a Secretary of State to publish an accurate list of which schools will/will not see their building projects completed, nor is it beyond his ability to give a realistic estimate of how many would take advantage of his invitation to become academies.
The truth, as we now know , is that most schools in England & Wales didn’t await the Academies Bill with the same breathlessness Gove had when he rushed it through Parliament.
continue reading… »
D-Miliband also confirms support for gay marriage
As Luke Skywalker would say, ‘almost there…’
Labour candidate David Miliband’s campaign got in touch just a few minutes ago to say that he has just written about his support for gay marriage.
During recent hustings and conversations with people around the country and on Twitter and Facebook, the issue of gay marriage has been raised on several occasions.
See I told you all this online campaigning works.
He adds:
We equalised the age of consent, scrapped the homophobic Section 28 and created civil partnerships. Because of our legislation some 33,956 civil partnerships have been registered across the country – over 500 in British Embassies abroad.
But it is an anomaly that gay couples – although they can call each other husband or wife – can’t say they are married. Canada and Argentina have shown the way forward.That’s why I support calls to change the definition of marriage to include exclusive relationships between couples, regardless of sex. This will mean gay couples will be able to describe themselves as married.
This does not force change in religious practice. I support the Labour amendment to the Equalities Act which made provision for religious communities to officiate civil partnerships but only if they felt appropriate. Under a new definition of marriage, the situation should to be the same. We should not force churches, mosques and synagogues to officiate over gay marriages but equally we shouldn’t stop those who want to.
Gay marriage is the logical next step in our mission for equality, but is just one part of our approach. Homophobia remains too common, including in schools. I want to tackle prejudices in law and in practice so we are always standing up for equal rights.
I welcome David Miliband’s support on this issue.
Your mission lefties, should you choose to accept it, is to now ask Ed Miliband (wherever you see him) why he’s the only Labour candidate not to support gay marriage.
Cameron is right: Pakistan does sponsor terrorism
It is not logically possible for anyone to have ‘gone off script’ during an ‘unscripted appearance’. That David Miliband can construct a sentence accusing David Cameron of such an offence is unfortunate proof that the the control freak mentality that characterised New Labour throughout the ‘on message’ mid 1990s is alive and well.
The occasion for the outburst came in an appearance on the World at One yesterday, in which the former foreign secretary discussed the current prime minister’s suggestion that elements within the Pakistani state are complicit in terrorist attacks in Afghanistan and India.
That this is the case is not in doubt to anyone who reads international relations journals, or even serious newspapers.
continue reading… »
Where does Labour go from here?
What is Labour’s future? Soundings journal, and Open Left at Demos ask the question in a new, jointly published e-book, Labour’s Future.
We don’t offer answers, but set out a series of points of view – from Phil Collins’ Liberal Republic to Doreen Massey’s, ‘the political struggle ahead’ – that frame the coming debate.
The decision by the Shadow Cabinet to oppose the AV referendum reinforces the view of a party that is exhausted, out of date and locked in a reactionary frame of mind. Its policy language is stuck with the generation of ’92, the frequent referencing of its values struggles to escape the cliches of ‘fairness’ and ‘progressive’.
continue reading… »
Why our immigration system needs an overhaul
contribution by Jessica Sims and Julie Gibbs
Tim Finch from ippr is right to call for the immigration system to be changed, highlighting the inequalities and injustices that scar the system.
However, we at Runnymede believe a credible immigration system must take seriously Britain’s commitment to human rights and justice, rather than focusing primarily on returning people who do not fit into narrowly defined categories.
In thinking about reforming our current system, it is more useful to emphasize return as it actually occurs in practice rather than how it is outlined in policy.
continue reading… »
What do those five days tell us about the Coalition?
contribution by Phil BC
Nick Robinson’s Five Days That Changed Britain yesterday evening was not the revelation-fest BBC trailers led us to believe.
I was almost knocked out my chair to discover Nick Clegg and Gordon Brown “didn’t get on”. My jaw hit the floor when it was revealed David Cameron thought Clegg was someone he could do business with. Okay, I’m being a bit facetious. But I did come away with the impression the real story of the post-election negotiations between Labour, the Tories and LibDems is yet to be told.
For the LibDems, ultimately a deal with Labour couldn’t be done because of Gordon: the real reason, it turned out, had more to do with Clegg’s volte-face over spending cuts. The official ConDem narrative claims the LibDems changed their minds once they saw the books.
continue reading… »
Trident spending axed as MOD will pay for it
The full £20bn cost of renewing the UK’s Trident nuclear deterrent must be paid for by the Ministry of Defence, George Osborne has said.
Traditionally, the Treasury has always found the money for the submarines.
The chancellor’s comments come as Defence Secretary Liam Fox warned it would be “very difficult” to maintain other MoD projects if more than half its budget went on funding Trident.
BBC’s Jonathan Beale said Mr Osborne risked igniting a political row.
The remarks come as the MoD is having to contemplate cuts in its budget of between 10% and 20%.
Government’s alcohol crime claims fall down
In a press release issued by the Home Office yesterday, Theresa May said:
The benefits promised by the 24 hour drinking ‘café culture’ have failed to materialise and in its place we have seen an increase in the number of alcohol related incidents and drink-fuelled crime and disorder.
We know that the majority of pubs and bars are well run business but the government believes that the system needs to be rebalanced in favour of the local communities they serve with tougher action taken to crack down on the small number of premises who cause problems.
The government wants to “overhaul” the Licensing Act on this basis, and wants to introduce a series of measures outlined here.
This includes “taking tough action against underage drinking”, “charging a fee for late-night licences” and “increasing licence fees” so councils can cover costs linked to police enforcement.
But does the Home Secretary’s original claim that there has been an “increase in the number of alcohol related incidents” stand up?
The Home Office reluctantly confirmed to FullFact.org that it holds no data covering all alcohol-related crime in England and Wales.
So where does the claim come from? The fact-checking org reports:
When pushed, the Home Office identified their recent report ‘Crime in England and Wales 2009/10’ as the source of Ms May’s claim. Using British Crime Survey data, this report does indeed calculate the number of violent incidents attributed to offenders perceived to have been under the influence of alcohol.
However, contrary to the Home Secretary’s claim, the number of alcohol related incidents recorded in this study has actually fallen since November 2005.
So if the numbers have actually fallen, how does Theresa May’s claim stand up?
The Home Office tells FullFact the quote, “should have referred to the proportion of crimes, rather than the number.”
In other words – it’s just spin.
Why forcing over 65s to retire is like being sacked for your looks
Should firms be free to sack workers who are short or ugly? The answer is yes, if you support the CBI’s opposition to the government’s decision to scrap the default retirement age.
The case for firms forcibly retiring 65-year-olds is that these tend to be less productive (pdf) than younger workers.
But there’s also good evidence that shorter and uglier workers are less productive too.
So, if firms are free to fire 65-year-olds, why shouldn’t they be free to fire stumpies and munters?
continue reading… »
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» What do we want from the BBC?
» The coming crisis of Conservatism
» Others should follow the Cooperative in boycotting Israeli settlement goods
» What’s the point of these justifications for the ongoing war in Afghanistan?
» The alternative: why Greece should NOT abandon the Euro
» For Cameron, looking weak is a bigger problem than being unpopular
» Most women don’t need counselling before abortion, shows study
» With Caroline Lucas stepping down, how the Greens need to change
» Advertising Standards Authority vs Archbishop Cranmer
» The far left versus the far right: French election part deux
» Our mental health services are a mess; can Labour change it?
|
42 Comments 44 Comments 53 Comments 64 Comments 3 Comments 27 Comments 14 Comments 33 Comments 25 Comments 28 Comments |
|
LATEST COMMENTS » Shinsei1967 posted on The coming crisis of Conservatism » modernity's ghost posted on Others should follow the Cooperative in boycotting Israeli settlement goods » David Flisher posted on IDS facing defeat at the next election » xtofer posted on The coming crisis of Conservatism » Cylux posted on Why are gay marriage activists so silent compared to the US? » Kojak posted on Others should follow the Cooperative in boycotting Israeli settlement goods » Graham posted on The coming crisis of Conservatism » tigerdarwin posted on IDS facing defeat at the next election » andrew adams posted on Others should follow the Cooperative in boycotting Israeli settlement goods » Churm Rincewind posted on What do we want from the BBC? » flyingrodent posted on Others should follow the Cooperative in boycotting Israeli settlement goods » vimothy posted on Most women don't need counselling before abortion, shows study » IDS Parole posted on IDS facing defeat at the next election » damon posted on Others should follow the Cooperative in boycotting Israeli settlement goods » So Much For Subtlety posted on Students: help us demand accountability from University Vice-Chancellors |
