Published: June 17th 2010 - at 10:55 am

London limits pay gap; Tories vote against


by Newswire    

A motion agreed at the Greater London Assembly (GLA) yesterday urged the Mayor to sign up to the Government’s pledge to limit senior public sector pay settlements.

And even though the Prime Minister has pledged to limit the highest public sector pay settlement to a 1:20 ratio, all Conservative Assembly Members opposed the motion yesterday.

Eventually the GLA passed a motion (proposed by Darren Johnson, Green Party AM) by 13 – 12, setting the maximum pay ratio allowed within the GLA and its associated bodies.

The cap would apply to the Greater London Authority, The Metropolitan Police Authority, The London Fire and Emergency Planning Authority, Transport for London and the London Development Agency and would include a long term goal of no one in the GLA Group being paid more than ten times the lowest salary.

The Greater London Assembly is following the example it took on the Living Wage, and is once again leading the way in best practice on remuneration and reducing inequality.

Darren Johnson AM said:

Research shows that pay inequality has a detrimental effect on the whole of society, the rich, the middle classes and the poor. Countries with a smaller gap between the well and low paid have less crime, fewer health problems and greater social cohesion.

We welcome David Cameron’s pledge to limit the pay gap in the public sector and urge Mayor Boris Johnson to follow his leader and implement a similar policy across the GLA Group.

He also wrote an article for Guardian CIF on the issue.

The full text of the motion reads as follows:

This Assembly notes the Prime Minister’s pledge to limit the highest public sector pay settlement to no more than twenty times that of the lowest worker, and the Equality Trust’s proposal to aim for pay inequality to be reduced to no more than ten times. The Assembly also notes that within the GLA Group there are approximately 90 staff paid more than ten times the London Living Wage.

As well as investigating issues that matter to Londoners, the London Assembly acts as a check and a balance on the Mayor.

From a press release


---------------------------
    Share on Tumblr  


About the author

· Other posts by


Story Filed Under: News


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


I can’t see any potential conflicts of interest or unintended consequences arising from this at all, oh no.

@ Falco

Why don’t you go into some detail?


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. oxfordbloo

    leopards? spots? ha ha… RT: @libcon: London to limit income inequality, but Tories vote against it http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  2. libcon

    London to limit income inequality, but Tories vote against it http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  3. randomvariable

    Reading: London to limit income inequality, but Tories vote against it: A motion agreed at the Greater London Asse… http://bit.ly/cRug6M

  4. mirabehnhobbit

    RT @libcon: London to limit income inequality, but Tories vote against it http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  5. Tweets that mention London to limit income inequality; Tories against it | Liberal Conspiracy -- Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy, Clare Cochrane. Clare Cochrane said: leopards? spots? ha ha… RT: @libcon: London to limit income inequality, but Tories vote against it http://bit.ly/b0NkOz [...]

  6. tom saunders

    All conservative members of GLA voted against living wage yesterday: http://bit.ly/d9hjYo funny that, conservatives voting against the poor

  7. RahevarG

    London to limit income inequality; Tories against it | Liberal …: This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal … http://bit.ly/cl4aSU

  8. Dhandeep Rahevar

    London to limit income inequality; Tories against it | Liberal …: This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal … http://bit.ly/cl4aSU

  9. Bhuvan Rahevar

    London to limit income inequality; Tories against it | Liberal …: This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal … http://bit.ly/cl4aSU

  10. Jayparth Rahevar

    London to limit income inequality; Tories against it | Liberal …: This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal … http://bit.ly/cl4aSU

  11. Jidhu Rahevar

    London to limit income inequality; Tories against it | Liberal …: This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal … http://bit.ly/cl4aSU

  12. Adam Bienkov

    Top earners must not earn more than 20 x bottom earners #budget. "Politically correct nonsense" say London Tories http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  13. Jenny Jones

    New gov says top earners must not earn > 20 x bottom earners. 'Politically correct nonsense' say London Tories. http://bit.ly/bsKZgg #budget

  14. Graham Jeffery

    RT @GreenJennyJones: New gov says top earners must not earn > 20 x bottom earners. 'Politically correct nonsense' say London Tories. http://bit.ly/bsKZgg #budget

  15. John West

    RT @AdamBienkov: Top earners must not earn more than 20 x bottom earners #budget. "Politically correct nonsense" say London Tories http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  16. One Society campaign

    RT @AdamBienkov: Top earners must not earn more than 20 x bottom earners #budget. "Politically correct nonsense" say London Tories http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  17. Rachel H

    RT @AdamBienkov: Top earners must not earn more than 20 x bottom earners #budget. "Politically correct nonsense" say London Tories http://bit.ly/b0NkOz

  18. Darren Johnson

    Budget: top earners must not earn > 20 x bottom earners. 'Politically correct nonsense' say London Tories. http://bit.ly/9xwxoa #budget

  19. AdamRamsay

    RT @DarrenJohnsonAM: Budget: top earners must not earn > 20 x bottom earners. 'Politically correct nonsense' say London Tories. http://bit.ly/9xwxoa #budget





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
LATEST COMMENT PIECES
» Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS






41 Comments



89 Comments



23 Comments



50 Comments



10 Comments



26 Comments



22 Comments



69 Comments



44 Comments



25 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Briar posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?

» Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» pagar posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» Amanda posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Chloe posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Zoroaster posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed'

» David Irvine posted on By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters

» PaulG posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan

» Victoria Lucas posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» John Ferrier posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Smoking Peaches posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Caroline Hirons posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother

» Caroline Hirons posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother