Companies boast insider info on Budget
Private companies are boasting that they have inside knowledge of what is going to be in the Government’s emergency budget on 22 June, which, if true, shows exactly whose side the coalition government is on, said the Unions union last night.
Mark Fox, Chief Executive of the Business Services Association (BSA), has e-mailed councils telling them that the Fair Deal provision, covering pension entitlements, will be abolished in the emergency budget.
BSA brings together private companies bidding for contracts in local government. Fox further claims to have had private discussions with ministers about the Emergency Budget.
Unions say that ditching crucial pension protection for low paid public sector workers, who are transferred to private companies, would not save the State a penny. It would, however, make the contracts more lucrative for private companies.
It’s general secretary, Dave Prentis, said:
It’s totally disgraceful and unconstitutional that multi-national companies should be given details of what is to be in the emergency budget. This is a clear indication that we are not, as the Cameron mantra goes, all in this together.
…
The fact that its abolition won’t save the country a single penny, shows that the intention is to make these contracts more lucrative for private companies. There would be no level playing field with an in-house bid, because contractors could undercut, at the expense of the workforce.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
5 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Surely the scrapping of the Fair Deal will actually cost the Country money. If you effectively reduce additional pensions for the low paid workers who become low paid pensioners, all you do is eventually increase the amount you pay out in pensioner credits etc.
In addition if in-work benefits are also covered by these changes to Fair Deal packages, this would immediately move some of the cost from the employer to the State.
Presumably someone who knows the interaction between the current Fair Deal systems and benefits should be able to work out the additional and future costs this would cause to the Government.
This may just be the BSA wishful thinking of course, but if they’re right there’s two political points here. Firstly if Osborne is leaking like a sieve on this, what is he telling all his City mates?
Secondly, if the head of the BSA feels confident enough to send out a general letter to Councils on this, the attitude of most local government leadership must be more concerned with the profits of their contractors than the conditions of their staff. Makes you wonder why
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- yorkierosie
RT @libcon: Companies boast insider info on Emergency Budget http://bit.ly/c82dii
- Ross Haffenden
RT @libcon: Companies boast insider info on Emergency Budget http://bit.ly/c82dii
- Liberal Conspiracy
Companies boast insider info on Emergency Budget http://bit.ly/c82dii
- Tweets that mention Companies boast insider info on Emergency Budget | Liberal Conspiracy -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy and Ross Haffenden, yorkierosie. yorkierosie said: RT @libcon: Companies boast insider info on Emergency Budget http://bit.ly/c82dii [...]
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 204 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » supermarketsweep posted on Job snob? No, I've got the T-shirt » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » cjcjc posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Planeshift posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Sheila Taylor posted on Revealed: That 'dossier' on Progress » Michael Swann posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









