Good choice of music.

So instead of following orders like a sheep from one individual, you should follow orders like a sheep from another. weak

Surely race, belief, gender, wealth, class, height, weight or hair colour etc. should be irrelevant. Should we not make our decisions based on policies and our perception of how competent someone is at performing their job? Since Labour there have been twice as many people employed by the public sector (blatently unsustainable and why we have a budget defecit so cuts are obviously necessary) and the Gini index (Internationally accepted method of calculating income disparity between the rich and the poor) has increased. So why are you against change?

@3.

Why should race, belief, gender, wealth, class, height, or hair colour etc be irrelevant?

Take homosexuality. If a gay man seeks office on a ticket of support for gay marriage, is his sexuality irrelevant?

If a Christian stands for election and seeks the inclusion of inteligent design in the science curriculum, is his or her religion irrelevant?

OK – I’ll grant you it is the policies that stem from their homosexuality or christianity that would be judged. But they do stem from those influences on their views, perceptions and priorities.

So it is with Cameron.

That he is posh would be quite beside the point. Indeed attacking him as such would be churlish and counter-productive. However, he then put forward a manifesto proposing to take from the poor and give to the rich.

The “posh boy” attacks are just a short hand for his plans to scrap tax breaks credits and cut spending on Sure Start, while handing out piles of cash to businessmen and the landed gentry.

The Tory party probably needs to wake up and realise that their biggest liability at this election was not Cameron, was not TV debates, and was not Clegg. It was their policies.

@2

If you can’t grasp the unique nature of the animosity felt towards Murdoch and his attack dogs then I fear you have stumbled accidentally onto the wrong website.