Compass endorses tactical voting, including Libdems


by Sunny Hundal    
April 30, 2010 at 4:28 pm

Last week the left-wing campaign group Compass asked its members whether Compass should advocate tactical voting in the forthcoming general election.

For various reasons outlined here, I endorsed this decision.

Today the pressure group reveals that they have a “clear result”.

72% (467) of members backed the call for tactical voting with only 14% (93) against.

There were 14% (90) abstentions/spoilt papers.

Compass say it was the biggest return they have ever had on an internal ballot.

This means that Compass is now calling on every progressive voter to back the Labour candidate wherever Labour can win.

But if Labour stands no chance against the Tory candidate it makes sense that the best placed progressive candidate is backed by every progressive voter.

To help informs decisions the organisation has produced a key marginal seats information table, based on the 2005 general election results, to help choose the best placed progressive candidate is.
Click here to download it.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by
Filed under
News


17 Comments || Add yours below

  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.


Reader comments


Sunny,

You might enjoy this good news from radio 5 live

http://www.youtube.com/user/ROCKTHEPOLL#p/u/0/HwfVryKwNzw

Compass has 950 members in total? They’ve got bloody good PR for a tiny group.

Regardless, sensible choice to make, really do think Labour’s lost it already, the more LDs there are the less chance Cameron has of getting everything he wants.

No, the turnout for the vote was 17% I believe

4. Nick Cohen is a Tory

Matt GB
I have been very impressed by the lib dems and articles by John Kampher and Richard Reeves. I really hope that there is a coalition of some sorts.
I was wrong about Gordon and Sunny and Johann Hari were correct. I would have loved to have seen a working class Labourite like Johntson / Cruddas ticket. Clegg has been by far the best candidate.
But I will be voting Labour for a number of reasons.
1. It is tribal, the Tories seem to use this as an insult, yet conservative voters are as tribal as Labour. Their percentage of core vote never changes and you can’t see Buckingham going Labour. I am tribally linked to Labour and their values.
2. I believe that Labour has achieved in areas like surestart and the maximum wage,
3. I don’t think your going to make a difference
4. Negative reasons. I want to cancel Nick Cohen’s tory vote

5. Christine Headley

Nick Cohen etc’s second point. Love the Freudian slip. I sometimes think that a maximum wage would be an excellent idea, but I fear it’s time has not yet come.

6. Christine Headley

Re my previous – I can’t believe that apostrophe.

7. Nick Cohen is a Tory

I do apologize. although a maximum wage wouldn’t be a bad idea
£100,000 say.

8. LetThemEatCake

There may be Tory seats vulnerable to a lib-dem surge that were not considered vulnerable before, it would be worth having some information to identify these as I’m sure some labour voters would be motivated to vote tactically. Any Tory seat lost means a better chance of the social chapter/ hunting ban etc. surviving. Does anyone have this information?

Living in a constituency where Labour stands little chance of winning, being a member of the party also means supporting the CLP and our candidate. Putting a Vote Labour poster in my window just down the road from Vince Cable’s house may seem pointless, but it is giving the message that the party is here, we’re active and we’re not in an electoral pact so we’re not giving way. The real problem is our rubbish electoral system that might make a vote for Labour help a Tory candidate win. However, a vote for Labour where we cannot win is a vote that says that we don’t give up and that ideals are at the heart of what we’re about. Tactical voting is about playing the game, and perhaps we should play only if absolutely necessary.

Come on guys, if the game’s there to be played, lets play it! labour is in my blood and i hav never in my adult life. for some of us, if we dnt vote tactically, our vote would be useless.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    Compass members endorse tactical voting; opens way for Libdem support: http://bit.ly/9xAy7s

  2. Jon Harvey

    RT @sunny_hundal: RT @libcon: Compass members endorse tactical voting; opens way for Libdem support: http://bit.ly/9xAy7s

  3. aidanskinner

    RT @sunny_hundal: RT @libcon: Compass members endorse tactical voting; opens way for Libdem support: http://bit.ly/9xAy7s

  4. jamiedouglas

    RT @sunny_hundal: RT @libcon: Compass members endorse tactical voting; opens way for Libdem support: http://bit.ly/9xAy7s

  5. sunny hundal

    RT @libcon: Compass members endorse tactical voting; opens way for Libdem support: http://bit.ly/9xAy7s

  6. Tactical voting set for a boost?

    [...] 72% (467) of members backed the call for tactical voting with only 14% (93) against. (Liberal Conspiracy) [...]

  7. Tactical voting set for a boost? | Mark Pack

    [...] result”.72% (467) of members backed the call for tactical voting with only 14% (93) against. (Liberal Conspiracy)That’s all very good news when it comes to turning a healthy share of the national vote into [...]





  • We have a tight comments policy aimed at fostering constructive debate.
  • We believe in free speech but not your right to abuse our space.
  • Abusive, sarcastic or silly comments may be deleted.
  • Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted.
  • Please familiarise yourself with our comments policy.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




62 Comments



15 Comments



23 Comments



10 Comments



24 Comments



19 Comments



17 Comments



83 Comments



204 Comments



85 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» TimJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Sheila Taylor posted on Revealed: That 'dossier' on Progress

» Michael Swann posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Andreas Moser posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve

» Robin Levett posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Women are being granted illegal abortions in UK, investigation reveals: TBIJ posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» LondonJ posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show?

» pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation

» the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation