Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support?
The US polling analysis site FiveThirtyEight.com – which was spot on and consistently excellent during the Obama campaign, has published two articles analysing voting patters in the UK.
They suggest that support for the Libdems and Labour may be understated.
1. In the first analysis they look at the proliferation of ‘mobile-phone-only’ households.
In the UK, at least 13 percent of households fall into the mobile-only category as of 2008, with lower income Britons far more likely to be mobile-only (23 percent) than wealthier people (8 percent). In addition, younger people are far more likely to live in mobile-only households, including more than a quarter of the youngest demographic group (15-24) and a fifth in 25-34 year olds.
Lower income households are more likely to be pro-Labour while the youth vote is moving strongly towards the Libdems. Most pollsters other than YouGov call households in order to gauge opinion.
If mobile-only households are left out then that could mean an understatement of Labour and Libdem support. In the US – pollsters understated support for Obama by about 2-3% due to this practice. But it does require the youth vote turning out for Clegg for this to hold true.
2. The second post concentrates on older voters and internet polling – carried out principally by YouGov.
They point out that since its mostly more educated people who are online, there is a danger that richer and more conservative voters are over-represented in older voters demographic. This doesn’t apply to younger voters as most of them are online anyway.
But what about poorer pensioners? Are they filling out YouGov polls? Are they being under-represented? Could this mean that the polls are understating Labour support in this category?
I’m going to email Peter Kellner of YouGov to ask.
Peter Kellner replies only to say that:
Taking everything into account, our figures are representative of the electorate by age, gender, social class, political affiliation and newspaper readership. That is why our results are consistently accurate.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Filed under
News
25 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
As long as the pollsters take account of who is likely to participate in their surveys it shouldn’t make too much difference.
YouGov have after all been the most accurate polling company for the last few years despite not surveying anyone who isn’t online because their weighting takes account of these things.
As for mobile phones, I heard the same kind of speculation during the US presidential race, but it turned out that the polls were pretty much accurate.
Conceivably, but in every previous election since 1983 it has been the Conservative position that has been understated in the polls, while Labour has been over-stated, sometimes quite dramatically.
Since this was still true last year at the European and local elections, and the year before in the local and mayoral elections, I doubt that, demographically, enough has changed to reverse this. Plus, of course, you have to consider that all polling companies apply drastic weighting methodologies to attempt to engineer out the deficiencies identified above.
Still, we’ll find out in a couple of weeks now.
There’s also a difference between preferring one party over another and actually getting out and voting for them. That’s likely to hit Labour more than the others. Most of their nominal supporters aren’t really arsed if they don’t get in or not. If it rains on election day, Labour are fucked.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- House Of Twits
RT @libcon Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/bA3hHC
- Chris Wiggin
RT @libcon: Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/bA3hHC #fb
- Greg Eden
RT @libcon: Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/bA3hHC
- Marcus Hickman
RT @libcon Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/9zSClw
- Thomas Rado
RT @Marcus_Hickman: RT @libcon Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/9zSClw
- Liberal Conspiracy
Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/bA3hHC
- Elrik Merlin
RT @libcon: Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/bA3hHC
- topsy_top20k_en
Are polls understating Labour & Libdem support? http://bit.ly/bA3hHC
- Lee Durbin
US polling site FiveThirtyEight asks: Is the Lib-Dem Surge For Real? http://bit.ly/cU8VPw (Liberal Conspiracy analysis http://bit.ly/csPi31)
- Gia Milinovich
@Greenleftie @hannahnicklin just sent this link: http://j.mp/aP0kNi 13% of UK households are mobile-only, also likely to be young/"liberals"
- hannahnicklin
40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration website http://bit.ly/c7SHDl same age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- David Smallwood
RT @hannahnicklin: 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration website http://bit.ly/c7SHDl same age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- Helen Lambert
RT @hannahnicklin: 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration website http://bit.ly/c7SHDl same age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- hannahnicklin
@girlonetrack 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration site http://bit.ly/c7SHDl age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- paulstpancras
RT @hannahnicklin: @girlonetrack 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration site http://bit.ly/c7SHDl age group… http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- hannahnicklin
@giagia this is a good article on it, 13% uk homes mobile-only http://j.mp/aP0kNi
- hannahnicklin
@Lettuphant 13% uk households mobile only, poorer and younger, more natural left wing territory http://j.mp/aP0kNi
- Will Wybrow
RT @hannahnicklin: 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration website http://bit.ly/c7SHDl same age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- Jamie Andrews
RT @hannahnicklin: 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration website http://bit.ly/c7SHDl same age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- andyvglnt
RT @hannahnicklin: 40% surge in 18-24 visits to voter registration website http://bit.ly/c7SHDl same age group is largely unpolled http://bit.ly/aP0kNi
- Lisa
RT @hannahnicklin: @Lisaansell I posted this at the time: http://bit.ly/aP0kNi it has links to the relevant studies.
- hannahnicklin
@Lisaansell I posted this at the time: http://bit.ly/aP0kNi it has links to the relevant studies.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Workfare – what does the evidence show?
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 10 Comments 25 Comments 19 Comments 17 Comments 83 Comments 208 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Spike1138 posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage » Chaise Guevara posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage » So Much For Subtlety posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Monchberter posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Cylux posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage » So Much For Subtlety posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on Rupert Murdoch cheers Rick Santorum to win » Spike1138 posted on Bigots launch coalition against gay marriage » Workfare – what does the evidence show? | Liberal Conspiracy | Job Offers posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » sackcloth and ashes posted on Ten weeks to London's election: where Ken needs to improve » Dick the Prick posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » the a&e charge nurse posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Spike1138 posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation |









