Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters
Campaigners against the third runway in Heathrow were celebrating after judges ordered a review of the plans, particularly with respect to their effect on climate change policy.
Heathrow Coalition Against Aircraft Noise reported:
The Government’s airport expansion policy is in tatters this morning (26th March) after a Judge ruled that ministers did not properly consult on a number of key issues before attempting to give consent to a third runway at Heathrow airport.
The Judge ruled that a January 2009 statement to the House of Commons by Geoff Hoon giving the green light to Heathrow expansion had no legal substance. He dismissed the Government’s claims to the contrary as ‘untenable in law and commonsense’.
The implications of today’s ruling are profound, not just for Heathrow but for airport expansion plans across the UK. The Heathrow decision is blown wide open, with the Government ordered to go back to the drawing board and consult on a number of key issues where the Judge found the Government’s position to be questionable. The judge ruled that if the Government decides to push ahead with the runway project it must now review the climate change implications of Heathrow expansion, the economic case for a third runway, and the issue of how additional passengers would get to a bigger airport. He also ruled that the Government’s entire aviation policy must now be reviewed to take into account the implications of the 2008 Climate Change Act.
Local Labour MP John McDonnell added, “In essence, this judgment means that the game is up for a third runway at Heathrow and I am calling upon the government to accept the inevitable and lift this threat to my community.”
---------------------------
| Tweet |
10 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Bad news IMHO
But Runway 3 will still go ahead regardless…just a little later than planned
I don’t agree with that Simon. I think if enough support is there to ditch the crazy plans, they will be ditched. The polls are against Labour winning and if there is a hung parliament, the Tories will probably keep to their pledge, despite their love of big business.
Well, perhaps you’re right Alice…but the fact is, there are more and more flights these days…and aeroplanes have to land somewhere.
It’s not enough really to say ‘NO’ to another runway..there would need to be an alternative?..They would have to either massively extend London City, or Gatwick…or god forbid, built a third airport.
Seriously – Heathrow NEEDS a 3rd runway ASAP as an environmental measure.
Anyone who’s spent 30-50 minutes circling the skies above London can’t help wonder what the CO2 impact is of this needless aviation.
It’s time for some brave policies. Build a 3rd runway now but limit flights to the current levels. Build incentives to move more flights to regional airports and make European or international moves to tax aircraft fuel.
It’s messed up I know but Heathrow is already over-capacity for 2 runways. Now it’s got 5 terminals it doesn’t make environmental sense to cut flights (the carbon’s already gone into building T5) so let’s be pragmatic here.
Build the 3rd runway.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters http://bit.ly/c7V4A5
- MusicMP
RT @libcon: Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters http://bit.ly/c7V4A5
- RupertRead
Good news!: Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters http://bit.ly/c7V4A5
- Ian McCulloch
RT @RupertRead: Good news!: Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters http://bit.ly/c7V4A5
- Elly M
RT @libcon: Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters http://bit.ly/c7V4A5
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Liberal Conspiracy, RupertRead and Ian McCulloch, MusicMP. MusicMP said: RT @libcon: Court victory for anti-Heathrow protesters http://bit.ly/c7V4A5 [...]
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Why Quantitative Easing doesn’t make common sense
» Barclays was also bailed out – Diamond doesn’t deserve a bonus
» Ten myths about private rented housing
» Even on the left, morality has its limits
» The NHS bill could be a Waterloo moment for the govt
» Ken Livingstone and gay rights – it just isn’t an issue
» Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?
» New study shows a Robinhood tax would boost growth
» In defence of Sky News’ re-Tweeting ban
» Another reason to continue banker bashing
» An attack on the wind industry is an attack on UK jobs
|
11 Comments 16 Comments 26 Comments 40 Comments 21 Comments 13 Comments 49 Comments 11 Comments 78 Comments 5 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » Step Left posted on Even on the left, morality has its limits » Jan Taranczuk posted on Ten myths about private rented housing » Tyler posted on Barclays was also bailed out - Diamond doesn't deserve a bonus » Bob B posted on Barclays was also bailed out - Diamond doesn't deserve a bonus » Bob B posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » michaela gabriel posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Meet My Sweet posted on Ed Miliband tried to persuade against Iraq » x posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Stuart White posted on Paediatricians Assoc. members slams NHS bill » Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality » Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles? » Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense » Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles? |









