VAT on Royal Mail services?
I think I’d better nip this one in the bud before any conspiracy nuts latch on to it…
VAT on Royal Mail services in 2011?
Here’s a curious thing, buried in the back of the Budget document it says;
“VAT and postal A.96 – From 31 January 2011 VAT will be applied at the standard rate to certain postal services provided by the universal service provider (Royal Mail).”
Did the price of stamps and other stuff in the future just go up by 17.5% or more?
So much for his comment of “I have no further announcements on VAT”
NOTE: Currently Royal Mail services are zero-rated and exempt from VAT.
Google is your friend as a quick search turns up this report from last November…
Royal Mail is facing another serious threat to its efforts to compete with private-sector rivals, just weeks after trades unions agreed to call a halt to a debilitating series of strikes during negotiations with the company.
The postal operator has been told by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) that it will soon be forced to begin charging valued added tax (VAT) for many of its services, having previously been exempt. At a stroke, that would add 17.5 per cent to the prices it charges businesses, rendering it at a serious competitive disadvantage.
HMRC’s ruling follows a judgment in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in a case brought by TNT Post, one of Royal Mail’s fiercest competitors in the UK. Under European Union law, publicly owned postal operators are exempt from having to charge VAT on their services and Royal Mail has always been able to enjoy this protection.
However, last month, TNT successfully challenged Royal Mail’s exemption, on the grounds that it should not apply on commercial contracts subject to a competitive tendering process. The ECJ ruling means that in most cases where Royal Mail pitches for work with business customers – the most crucial part of its market – it will now have to begin charging VAT, as all of its private-sector rivals already do.
So, no – the price of stamps won’t be going up and as technical change resulting from an legal ruling on the correct interpretation of existing law, its not something that would announced in the main Budget Speech.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
'Unity' is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He also blogs at Ministry of Truth.
· Other posts by Unity
Story Filed Under: Economy ,News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Unity
RT @libcon: VAT on Royal Mail services? http://bit.ly/9nb0uY
- Left Outside
RT @libcon VAT on Royal Mail services? http://bit.ly/cSevq8
- Unity
@dizzythinks Answer to your Royal Mail/VAT question – http://bit.ly/9nb0uY
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » VAT on Royal Mail services? -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Unity, Unity. Unity said: @dizzythinks Answer to your Royal Mail/VAT question – http://bit.ly/9nb0uY [...]
- liberal state
[...] published Within a press conference held on March, 19th, in the Media Centre of Ramallah, theLiberal Conspiracy VAT on Royal Mail services?Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website. Notify me of followup comments via [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
28 Comments 72 Comments 21 Comments 49 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » john b posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » john b posted on On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people » john b posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think » P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem |










