VAT on Royal Mail services?
I think I’d better nip this one in the bud before any conspiracy nuts latch on to it…
VAT on Royal Mail services in 2011?
Here’s a curious thing, buried in the back of the Budget document it says;
“VAT and postal A.96 – From 31 January 2011 VAT will be applied at the standard rate to certain postal services provided by the universal service provider (Royal Mail).”
Did the price of stamps and other stuff in the future just go up by 17.5% or more?
So much for his comment of “I have no further announcements on VAT”
NOTE: Currently Royal Mail services are zero-rated and exempt from VAT.
Google is your friend as a quick search turns up this report from last November…
Royal Mail is facing another serious threat to its efforts to compete with private-sector rivals, just weeks after trades unions agreed to call a halt to a debilitating series of strikes during negotiations with the company.
The postal operator has been told by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) that it will soon be forced to begin charging valued added tax (VAT) for many of its services, having previously been exempt. At a stroke, that would add 17.5 per cent to the prices it charges businesses, rendering it at a serious competitive disadvantage.
HMRC’s ruling follows a judgment in the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in a case brought by TNT Post, one of Royal Mail’s fiercest competitors in the UK. Under European Union law, publicly owned postal operators are exempt from having to charge VAT on their services and Royal Mail has always been able to enjoy this protection.
However, last month, TNT successfully challenged Royal Mail’s exemption, on the grounds that it should not apply on commercial contracts subject to a competitive tendering process. The ECJ ruling means that in most cases where Royal Mail pitches for work with business customers – the most crucial part of its market – it will now have to begin charging VAT, as all of its private-sector rivals already do.
So, no – the price of stamps won’t be going up and as technical change resulting from an legal ruling on the correct interpretation of existing law, its not something that would announced in the main Budget Speech.
---------------------------
| Tweet |
'Unity' is a regular contributor to Liberal Conspiracy. He also blogs at Ministry of Truth.
· Other posts by Unity
Filed under
Economy ,News
5 Comments || Add yours below
Reader comments
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Unity
RT @libcon: VAT on Royal Mail services? http://bit.ly/9nb0uY
- Left Outside
RT @libcon VAT on Royal Mail services? http://bit.ly/cSevq8
- Unity
@dizzythinks Answer to your Royal Mail/VAT question – http://bit.ly/9nb0uY
- Tweets that mention Liberal Conspiracy » VAT on Royal Mail services? -- Topsy.com
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Unity, Unity. Unity said: @dizzythinks Answer to your Royal Mail/VAT question – http://bit.ly/9nb0uY [...]
- liberal state
[...] published Within a press conference held on March, 19th, in the Media Centre of Ramallah, theLiberal Conspiracy VAT on Royal Mail services?Name (required) Mail (will not be published) (required) Website. Notify me of followup comments via [...]
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» The real agenda behind Telegraph’s abortion investigation
» How Scotland Yard monitors prying bloggers and journalists
» When disabled people want to work – employers can hold the back
» Revealed: the reality behind Workfare and why it doesn’t work
» Job snob? No, I’ve got the T-shirt
» Why country-by-country reporting matters to our wellbeing
» If Unions want to become stronger, they need to modernise
» Why work “reforms” in Spain are a warning for workers across Europe
» Five things you need to know about the NHS bill
» Bigger. Fatter. Gypsier. More Racist.
» Laziness levels in Britain getting lazier, wails government
|
62 Comments 15 Comments 23 Comments 8 Comments 24 Comments 19 Comments 16 Comments 83 Comments 203 Comments 85 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » JIm posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » BendyGirl posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » rentergirl posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Chaise Guevara posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » sunny hundal posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Tyler posted on When disabled people want to work - employers can hold the back » pagar posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Jared Earle posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Craig Grannell posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely » Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely » JIm posted on The real agenda behind Telegraph's abortion investigation » K Carington Smith posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? » Martin McIvor posted on Labour: public pay won't be frozen entirely » pagar posted on Workfare - what does the evidence show? |









