Back to the 1970s with William Hague


by Dave Osler    
March 10, 2010 at 3:01 pm

Has somebody gone and invented time travel, and the story broke on a day when I was just too hungover to listen to the Today Programme? Or could it be that Peter Mandelson is secretly a Time Lord? They are supposed to look like human beings, after all.

I only ask because William Hague is set to give a speech today, arguing that a Labour victory at the general election will take Britain back to the 1970s.

This riff seems to play the same role in contemporary Tory discourse as the opening chords to Honky Tonk Women do at a Rolling Stones gig. Keef only has to launch into that famous look-no-hands duuuh … dum dum duuuh … dum dum bit on his open-tuned telecaster, and the joint goes wild. That’s because the audience knows what’s coming next.

So it is when Daily Telegraph editorial writers and the Federation of Small Businesses trot out their lame cover versions of one of Conservatism’s greatest hits. The dead unburied on Merseyside! Uncollected garbage in Leicester Square! Picket lines everywhere!

Apparently the pointy heads are split on the possibilities of Hague’s prediction coming good. Some think one-way travel into the future might just be possible, based on the gravitational time dilation effect spelled out in the theory of general relativity. But it is currently unclear whether the laws of physics rule out a return to the years of my teens.

However, the truth is that there is more chance of The Clash getting back together again than there is of New Labour revisiting the era of punk rock. If Baseball Cap Dude’s speech really contends that the left is once more in the ascendant and that unions will somehow dominate any Labour administration that may emerge after the impending contest, he can only be delivering it after at least six pints of the 14 a day he is partial to knocking back.

What Hague really means to say is that there are important differences of substance between the economic policies that Labour would adopt if returned to office, and those of a Tory administration in which he would presumably play a leading part.

I can’t say that, as a socialist, I am particularly enthused about what is on offer from either quarter. Labour’s plans to start work on deficit reduction only once the recovery has been firmly established, while protecting frontline investment in schools and hospitals, will be painful for many. I for one will be on the inevitable protest marches.

But the contrast with the pre-Keynesian Treasury View orthodoxy of Osbornomics is sharp enough. That wouldn’t take us back to the 1970s; it would mark a return to the 1930s. That’s what the Tories truly want, and it is the last thing Britain needs.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Dave Osler is a regular contributor. He is a British journalist and author, ex-punk and ex-Trot. Also at: Dave's Part
· Other posts by
Filed under
Blog


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


Eric Pickles = The Abzorbaloff

any others?

Did they have cctv, ID cards, dodgy databases back in the seventies?
Brown’s Labour would be more 1984.

Ah, but the guitar bands were REAL guitar bands.

That wouldn’t take us back to the 1970s; it would mark a return to the 1930s. That’s what the Tories truly want, and it is the last thing Britain needs.

Tha sees – this is where I am between a rock and a hard place. I do keep thinking that the UK has to have an openly Thatcherite government with all that; that entails – unlike the knobrots that are Thatcher-lite at the moment.

Will the pain and suffering that this will bring be enough to get the public to wake up and say ‘Enough is enough’ and really do something about the black hole that is parliament at the moment.

The hard place is that I don’t want anyone to suffer at all, just for people to realise that having a Tory government will lead the UK into depression, worse than recession.

As me ol’ Dad used to say “They need a boot up the arse!”

IMO William Hague is better advised to concentrate on his foreign affairs brief since he plainly doesn’t have much of a clue about the economic issues of the 1970s, which were very different from those now. For a start, we don’t have double digit inflation rates – the prospect of a double-dip recession and deflation are more threatening. Nor have we had a legacy of statutory then voluntary incomes policies or anything remotely like the winter of discontent of 1978/9.

It’s not as though Hague’s foreign affairs brief isn’t sufficiently challenging to test his err . . talents.

For starters, there’s the pressing matter of the links made by the Conservatives with their new found friends from Poland in the European Conservative and Reform Group (ECR). This press report clarifies a few of the dilemmas:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/jul/19/rabbi-tories-polish-mep

Then there’s the matter of standing should-to-shoulder with the NeoCons in America, as Iain Duncan Smith repeatedly urged Tony Blair to do. Btw whatever happened to Iain Duncan Smith?

Surely, regime change hasn’t fallen out of fashion already. Consider all those regimes which need changing into democracies: China, Iran and Zimbabwe, just for starters. There are plenty more invasions to gear up for.

OTOH just possibly, it’s dawned on David Cameron that George Osborne is an electoral liability so Cameron is lining up Hague to take replace him.

6. Stephen Rouse

…or Hague is laying the groundwork for a “we weren’t Thatcherite enough” narrative should Cameron fail to achieve a majority against one of the most unpopular administrations in history.

@6; “Hague is laying the groundwork for a ‘we weren’t Thatcherite enough’ narrative”

Would that signal the next Conservative government returning to the “Medium Term Financial Strategy” – the proper title of Monetarism, which was formally abandoned in autumn 1985 – then promoting an unsustainable boom leading to a renewed surge in inflation by the late 1980s, plus an intention to rejoin the European Exchange Rate Mechanism we were forced to leave in September 1992?

By 1992, total tax revenues as a percentage of Britain’s GDP were much the same as in May 1979 when Mrs Thacher became PM.

If that is what Hague plans, I can hardly contain my enthusiasm, Surely, Conservatives can’t be that stupid?

8. Golden Gordon

I don’t know I am feeling all 1970′s. Harry’s Place having right wing Freedom association lovers like Risdon writing for them.
Makes me all nostalgic
Ah those days at Grunwick.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs




Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




3 Comments



14 Comments



24 Comments



30 Comments



21 Comments



13 Comments



49 Comments



11 Comments



77 Comments



5 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Meet My Sweet posted on Ed Miliband tried to persuade against Iraq

» x posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Bob B posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain

» diogenes posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Charlieman posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» diogenes posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Trooper Thompson posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain

» Trooper Thompson posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Chris posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain