<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Libtard conspiracy: reply to James Delingpole</title>
	<atom:link href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/</link>
	<description>Left-wing news, opinion and activism</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:08:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Firth</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-125439</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Firth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Apr 2010 08:39:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-125439</guid>
		<description>&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;Libtard conspiracy: reply to James Delingpole http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">Libtard conspiracy: reply to James Delingpole <a href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/" rel="nofollow">http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/</a></span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Golden Gordon</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112676</link>
		<dc:creator>Golden Gordon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112676</guid>
		<description>Delingpole is very popular with sections of the blogging world  such as the Cohenites, Harry Placers and the Burchill crowd (you know Chas Newkly Burden). Not really surprised that Tim J likes his book.
I feel quite sorry for the guy, to be bitter and twisted at his age, what the F*** is going to be like at 50.
At least Amis grew into his persona</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delingpole is very popular with sections of the blogging world  such as the Cohenites, Harry Placers and the Burchill crowd (you know Chas Newkly Burden). Not really surprised that Tim J likes his book.<br />
I feel quite sorry for the guy, to be bitter and twisted at his age, what the F*** is going to be like at 50.<br />
At least Amis grew into his persona</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112172</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 12:34:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112172</guid>
		<description>http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/reviewofbooks_article/3372/

Pair of twats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/reviewofbooks_article/3372/" rel="nofollow">http://www.spiked-online.com/index.php?/site/reviewofbooks_article/3372/</a></p>
<p>Pair of twats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whybird</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112165</link>
		<dc:creator>Whybird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112165</guid>
		<description>@Dunc:

Delingpole: An erection plainly visible through the trousers of a bearded drunk fast asleep opposite you on a train.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dunc:</p>
<p>Delingpole: An erection plainly visible through the trousers of a bearded drunk fast asleep opposite you on a train.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: little keithy</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112156</link>
		<dc:creator>little keithy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 11:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112156</guid>
		<description>Delingpole admitted once, with a hint of pride, to being taught Marxism by that idiot Brendan Buffoon from Spiked online. Bit like being taught Catholicism by Paisley. Evidence methinks of the man&#039;s Class A stupidity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delingpole admitted once, with a hint of pride, to being taught Marxism by that idiot Brendan Buffoon from Spiked online. Bit like being taught Catholicism by Paisley. Evidence methinks of the man&#8217;s Class A stupidity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112133</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 10:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112133</guid>
		<description>Not quite, Andrew Adams. He claims to enjoy attracting left-wing hatred but it&#039;s all just a cry for help. He is fucking desperate for approval, and he doesn&#039;t get it because he&#039;s a complete cunt, so he pretends not to care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite, Andrew Adams. He claims to enjoy attracting left-wing hatred but it&#8217;s all just a cry for help. He is fucking desperate for approval, and he doesn&#8217;t get it because he&#8217;s a complete cunt, so he pretends not to care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andrew adams</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112108</link>
		<dc:creator>andrew adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 08:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112108</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;‘[T]he language of debate has been hijacked so comprehensively by the liberal left that not even conservatives dare speak up for right-wing views any more for fear of being dismissed as extremist.’&lt;/i&gt;

Haha, because of course it&#039;s so hard to find right wing views expressed in our media. Just like &quot;we&#039;re not allowed to talk about immigration&quot;, which explains the total absence of scare stories about immigration on the front pages of the Express, Mail etc.

Seriously though, it&#039;s really not worth responding to Delingpole - his only aim is to provoke the people he hates, and he really hates liberal lefties. If we really want to upset him we should just ignore him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>‘[T]he language of debate has been hijacked so comprehensively by the liberal left that not even conservatives dare speak up for right-wing views any more for fear of being dismissed as extremist.’</i></p>
<p>Haha, because of course it&#8217;s so hard to find right wing views expressed in our media. Just like &#8220;we&#8217;re not allowed to talk about immigration&#8221;, which explains the total absence of scare stories about immigration on the front pages of the Express, Mail etc.</p>
<p>Seriously though, it&#8217;s really not worth responding to Delingpole &#8211; his only aim is to provoke the people he hates, and he really hates liberal lefties. If we really want to upset him we should just ignore him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112076</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112076</guid>
		<description>Why? I&#039;m having a good night slagging Tories off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why? I&#8217;m having a good night slagging Tories off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Left Outside</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112075</link>
		<dc:creator>Left Outside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112075</guid>
		<description>@ &quot;Fuck off you virgin&quot;?

What&#039;s going on people? Up your game, say something relevant or if not, at least entertaining, not pubescent.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ &#8220;Fuck off you virgin&#8221;?</p>
<p>What&#8217;s going on people? Up your game, say something relevant or if not, at least entertaining, not pubescent.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112074</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:44:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112074</guid>
		<description>&#039;Fuck off Shitterface, you virgin.&#039;

Oh, my god - does it show? 

Real high level of debate here and PP right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Fuck off Shitterface, you virgin.&#8217;</p>
<p>Oh, my god &#8211; does it show? </p>
<p>Real high level of debate here and PP right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112071</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112071</guid>
		<description>Fuck off Shitterface, you virgin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuck off Shitterface, you virgin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shatterface</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112066</link>
		<dc:creator>Shatterface</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112066</guid>
		<description>&#039;Delingpole = another word for knobjockey&#039;

Ah, homophobia. Showing your real colours I see.

&#039;Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted&#039;
except when directed at those designated non-people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Delingpole = another word for knobjockey&#8217;</p>
<p>Ah, homophobia. Showing your real colours I see.</p>
<p>&#8216;Misogynist, racist, homophobic and xenophobic comments will be deleted&#8217;<br />
except when directed at those designated non-people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rob tennant</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112064</link>
		<dc:creator>rob tennant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 20:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112064</guid>
		<description>What a total cunt Delingpole, for suggesting that it makes a difference whether beaten-up kids are one race or another. Complete racist cunt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a total cunt Delingpole, for suggesting that it makes a difference whether beaten-up kids are one race or another. Complete racist cunt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bernard</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112062</link>
		<dc:creator>bernard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 19:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112062</guid>
		<description>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/01/27/constituent-harassed-by-telegraph-readers-after-sending-email-to-tory-ppc/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/01/27/constituent-harassed-by-telegraph-readers-after-sending-email-to-tory-ppc/" rel="nofollow">http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/01/27/constituent-harassed-by-telegraph-readers-after-sending-email-to-tory-ppc/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurrzem!</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112048</link>
		<dc:creator>Yurrzem!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112048</guid>
		<description>Sorry, being a libtard I&#039;m a bit slow. Is a righty a rectum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, being a libtard I&#8217;m a bit slow. Is a righty a rectum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112047</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 18:12:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112047</guid>
		<description>Delingpole deserves personal attacks. He is a thoroughly disgusting excuse for a man. Everybody should read his opinions on when it is, or is not, acceptable to beat up children. 

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/10079233/What_the_BBC_didnt_want_you_to_know_about_the_Belfast_Romanians/

The person who wrote that is the scum of the earth. He can pretentiously call it an &quot;ad hominem&quot; attack if he wants. I call him someone who isn&#039;t fit to mix with decent people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Delingpole deserves personal attacks. He is a thoroughly disgusting excuse for a man. Everybody should read his opinions on when it is, or is not, acceptable to beat up children. </p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/10079233/What_the_BBC_didnt_want_you_to_know_about_the_Belfast_Romanians/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/10079233/What_the_BBC_didnt_want_you_to_know_about_the_Belfast_Romanians/</a></p>
<p>The person who wrote that is the scum of the earth. He can pretentiously call it an &#8220;ad hominem&#8221; attack if he wants. I call him someone who isn&#8217;t fit to mix with decent people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisgustedOfTunbridgeWells</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112044</link>
		<dc:creator>DisgustedOfTunbridgeWells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:47:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112044</guid>
		<description>Has it got Germans in though? 

They&#039;re evidence of &#039;PC gone mad&#039; according to Delingpole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has it got Germans in though? </p>
<p>They&#8217;re evidence of &#8216;PC gone mad&#8217; according to Delingpole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim J</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112038</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112038</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I had the misfortune to read his book once, he really is certifiable.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I thought Coward on the Beach was rather good...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I had the misfortune to read his book once, he really is certifiable.</p></blockquote>
<p>I thought Coward on the Beach was rather good&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yurrzem!</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112037</link>
		<dc:creator>Yurrzem!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112037</guid>
		<description>Bill Hicks, may he rest in peace, had a few things to say about Rush Limbaugh (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F7Q7BkAbCk). Funnily enough, its obscene.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill Hicks, may he rest in peace, had a few things to say about Rush Limbaugh (<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F7Q7BkAbCk" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6F7Q7BkAbCk</a>). Funnily enough, its obscene.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DisgustedOfTunbridgeWells</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-112034</link>
		<dc:creator>DisgustedOfTunbridgeWells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 17:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-112034</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I tend to think that even half-heartedly debating Delingpole’s ideas is to engage in a massive great category error. It’s like holding a symposium on the moral and ethical implications of “In the Night Garden.”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Delingpole unwittingly engages in what I like to call the &#039;asymmetrical horseshit gambit&#039; - by saying things so completely absurd you completely demoralise your opponent by forcing them to engage you in a foreign reality.

I had the misfortune to read his book once, he really is certifiable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I tend to think that even half-heartedly debating Delingpole’s ideas is to engage in a massive great category error. It’s like holding a symposium on the moral and ethical implications of “In the Night Garden.”</p></blockquote>
<p>Delingpole unwittingly engages in what I like to call the &#8216;asymmetrical horseshit gambit&#8217; &#8211; by saying things so completely absurd you completely demoralise your opponent by forcing them to engage you in a foreign reality.</p>
<p>I had the misfortune to read his book once, he really is certifiable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blanco</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-111994</link>
		<dc:creator>Blanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 15:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-111994</guid>
		<description>@ Jonn

Delingpole is Tinky Winky, and Hannan is the baby in the sun</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Jonn</p>
<p>Delingpole is Tinky Winky, and Hannan is the baby in the sun</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonn</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-111975</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-111975</guid>
		<description>I tend to think that even half-heartedly debating Delingpole&#039;s ideas is to engage in a massive great category error. It&#039;s like holding a symposium on the moral and ethical implications of &quot;In the Night Garden.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tend to think that even half-heartedly debating Delingpole&#8217;s ideas is to engage in a massive great category error. It&#8217;s like holding a symposium on the moral and ethical implications of &#8220;In the Night Garden.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Worstall</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-111957</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Worstall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:04:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-111957</guid>
		<description>&quot;What would a Hannan be?&quot;

The opposite of a Harman of course....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;What would a Hannan be?&#8221;</p>
<p>The opposite of a Harman of course&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: asquith</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-111944</link>
		<dc:creator>asquith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:31:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-111944</guid>
		<description>Excellent suggestion, 5. Perhaps there could be a new updated version of The Meaning of Liff with things like this in?

What would a Hannan be?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent suggestion, 5. Perhaps there could be a new updated version of The Meaning of Liff with things like this in?</p>
<p>What would a Hannan be?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blanco</title>
		<link>http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/03/09/libtard-conspiracy-reply-to-james-delingpole/#comment-111941</link>
		<dc:creator>Blanco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:29:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=12183#comment-111941</guid>
		<description>@Dunc

Seconded!

Delingpole = another word for knobjockey</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dunc</p>
<p>Seconded!</p>
<p>Delingpole = another word for knobjockey</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

