The first local internet general election


by Mark Pack    
March 8, 2010 at 12:00 pm

For the third general election in a row, the run-up is seeing numerous meetings and articles asking whether this election will be the first internet general election.

However, much – in fact, nearly all – of the discussion falls into two traps which are common across political journalism in the UK. First, an undue focus on the central, national picture and, second, an undue focus on the novel.

Ask those involved in organising internet campaigning for any of the major parties about what really matters and you’ll get two answers repeated. They repeatedly – and rightly – emphasise the importance of the internet for local campaigning and they also emphasise its importance for the equivalent of plumbing and sewage systems in a political party – that mostly hidden infrastructure which is vital to effective operation.

If you look at the film clips put up on YouTube by any of the main parties, only the most successful get more than 10,000 views. Yet it takes 10 million votes give or take a bit to win a general election. There’s just a complete mismatch of scales.

But look at audiences at the local level and they are often equal to a significant proportion of the constituency electorate.

The balance – or rather imbalance – between local and national audiences also comes through in a calculation I worked out a couple of years ago. In constituencies with well-developed local Liberal Democrat websites, for every one visit made to one of the party’s national sites by someone living in the constituency there were three visits to the local site.

Local is where the online audience is. Yet local is not where the punditry is usually. That is partly for understandable reasons; it is much easier to keep track of what parties are doing online with their national websites than to delve in to the hundreds of different local constituencies and their numerous different stories.

The national media has moved over the last decade to understanding that campaigns are not all about national speeches and Westminster press conferences, and that what happens on the ground in constituencies is key to the results. That same move however has not yet been made when it comes to understanding the internet’s impact on political campaigning.

Returning to the plumbing and sewage systems analogy, there are again understandable reasons why the media give them relatively little attention. It’s harder to get access to the sort of information needed to make such coverage meaningful and we, the consumers of the media’s output, overall do have a love of stories about the new and the dramatic rather than about the boring and the incremental.

Add it all together though, and the reality of how the internet has and is changing political campaigning adds up to a rather different picture, one I’ve sketched in more detail here.


---------------------------
     


About the author
Mark Pack recently joined Mandate as an Associate Director, Digital, having previously been Head of Innovations at the Liberal Democrats. He now blogs here.
· Other posts by
Filed under
Blog ,Libdems ,Local Government ,Media


Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.


Reader comments


1. Sunder Katwala

Mark,

Thanks for the post. I have got a lot out of your excellent and nuanced accounts of what difference these changes do and don’t make.

To others, I really recommend the longer piece on Mark’s own blog.

Apart from the local/national point, I think a central point about what is or isn’t changing is that online communication has already changed debate within each of the parties and seems likely to do so in potentially transformative ways, as well as creating new opportunities to argue and engage between those within parties and broader non-party politically engaged audiences (like LC). But it is naturally going to do much less (and more slowly) to transform political communication with the electorate, and especially at a national as opposed to local level.

Thanks Sunder for the kind words.


Reactions: Twitter, blogs
  1. Liberal Conspiracy

    The first local internet general election http://bit.ly/cyZSSk

  2. Mark Pack

    RT @libcon The first local internet general election http://bit.ly/b5y3rF < Guest post from me

  3. Helen L

    Some good stuff on @libcon lately about online politics & the internet's role in the next election: http://tr.im/R3XS / http://tr.im/R3YU

  4. Mary Thorogood

    RT @markpack: RT @libcon The first local internet general election http://bit.ly/b5y3rF < Guest post from me

  5. My English Journey » Blog Archive

    [...] Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election [...]

  6. My English Journey » Blog Archive

    [...] Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election [...]

  7. Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election | Politics Blog

    [...] unknown wrote a very interesting post today.   Here’s a quick excerpt:They repeatedly – and rightly – emphasise the importance of the internet for local campaigning and they also emphasise its importance for the equivalent of plumbing and sewage systems in a political party – that mostly hidden … [...]

  8. Internet Marketing Basics – How The Online Money Flows | Last Minute Marketing

    [...] Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election [...]

  9. Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election - iKnew

    [...] reading here: Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election Bookmark [...]

  10. The first local internet general election | Mark Pack

    [...] Cross-posted from Liberal Conspiracy Share with others: [...]





Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

 
Liberal Conspiracy is the UK's most popular left-of-centre politics blog. Our aim is to re-vitalise the liberal-left through discussion and action. More about us here.

You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
RECENT OPINION ARTICLES




3 Comments



14 Comments



24 Comments



30 Comments



21 Comments



13 Comments



49 Comments



11 Comments



77 Comments



5 Comments



LATEST COMMENTS
» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Meet My Sweet posted on Ed Miliband tried to persuade against Iraq

» x posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Charlieman posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Frances_coppola posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Cylux posted on Abu Qatada deportation: what about our principles?

» Bob B posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain

» diogenes posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Charlieman posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» diogenes posted on Why Quantitative Easing doesn't make common sense

» Trooper Thompson posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain

» Trooper Thompson posted on High pay - in football and banking - shouldn't be about morality

» Chris posted on Ed Mili: We need a new post-Thatcher "settlement" for Britain