For the third general election in a row, the run-up is seeing numerous meetings and articles asking whether this election will be the first internet general election.
However, much – in fact, nearly all – of the discussion falls into two traps which are common across political journalism in the UK. First, an undue focus on the central, national picture and, second, an undue focus on the novel.
Ask those involved in organising internet campaigning for any of the major parties about what really matters and you’ll get two answers repeated. They repeatedly – and rightly – emphasise the importance of the internet for local campaigning and they also emphasise its importance for the equivalent of plumbing and sewage systems in a political party – that mostly hidden infrastructure which is vital to effective operation.
If you look at the film clips put up on YouTube by any of the main parties, only the most successful get more than 10,000 views. Yet it takes 10 million votes give or take a bit to win a general election. There’s just a complete mismatch of scales.
But look at audiences at the local level and they are often equal to a significant proportion of the constituency electorate.
The balance – or rather imbalance – between local and national audiences also comes through in a calculation I worked out a couple of years ago. In constituencies with well-developed local Liberal Democrat websites, for every one visit made to one of the party’s national sites by someone living in the constituency there were three visits to the local site.
Local is where the online audience is. Yet local is not where the punditry is usually. That is partly for understandable reasons; it is much easier to keep track of what parties are doing online with their national websites than to delve in to the hundreds of different local constituencies and their numerous different stories.
The national media has moved over the last decade to understanding that campaigns are not all about national speeches and Westminster press conferences, and that what happens on the ground in constituencies is key to the results. That same move however has not yet been made when it comes to understanding the internet’s impact on political campaigning.
Returning to the plumbing and sewage systems analogy, there are again understandable reasons why the media give them relatively little attention. It’s harder to get access to the sort of information needed to make such coverage meaningful and we, the consumers of the media’s output, overall do have a love of stories about the new and the dramatic rather than about the boring and the incremental.
Add it all together though, and the reality of how the internet has and is changing political campaigning adds up to a rather different picture, one I’ve sketched in more detail here.
| post to del.icio.us |
Mark,
Thanks for the post. I have got a lot out of your excellent and nuanced accounts of what difference these changes do and don’t make.
To others, I really recommend the longer piece on Mark’s own blog.
Apart from the local/national point, I think a central point about what is or isn’t changing is that online communication has already changed debate within each of the parties and seems likely to do so in potentially transformative ways, as well as creating new opportunities to argue and engage between those within parties and broader non-party politically engaged audiences (like LC). But it is naturally going to do much less (and more slowly) to transform political communication with the electorate, and especially at a national as opposed to local level.
Thanks Sunder for the kind words.
The first local internet general election http://bit.ly/cyZSSk
RT @libcon The first local internet general election http://bit.ly/b5y3rF < Guest post from me
Some good stuff on @libcon lately about online politics & the internet's role in the next election: http://tr.im/R3XS / http://tr.im/R3YU
RT @markpack: RT @libcon The first local internet general election http://bit.ly/b5y3rF < Guest post from me
[...] Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election [...]
[...] Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election [...]
[...] unknown wrote a very interesting post today. Here’s a quick excerpt:They repeatedly – and rightly – emphasise the importance of the internet for local campaigning and they also emphasise its importance for the equivalent of plumbing and sewage systems in a political party – that mostly hidden … [...]
[...] Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election [...]
[...] reading here: Liberal Conspiracy » The first local internet general election Bookmark [...]
[...] Cross-posted from Liberal Conspiracy Share with others: [...]
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
|
34 Comments 22 Comments 7 Comments 46 Comments 17 Comments 67 Comments 15 Comments 76 Comments 11 Comments 22 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » PDF posted on D-Miliband also confirms support for gay marriage » damon posted on Why our immigration system needs an overhaul » Bob B posted on Where does Labour go from here? » Bob B posted on Polls shows voters turn on the Coalition » Mr S. Pill posted on Polls shows voters turn on the Coalition » Cassandrina posted on Polls shows voters turn on the Coalition » thomas posted on Where does Labour go from here? » earwicga posted on Ed Miliband hints at gay marriage support too » Sunny Hundal posted on Ed Miliband hints at gay marriage support too » Bob B posted on Why it became Michael Gove's awful month » Sally posted on Where does Labour go from here? » Bob posted on Contrary to the media, the sex industry doesn't empower women » Sally posted on Why it became Michael Gove's awful month » andrew posted on Why it became Michael Gove's awful month » Bob B posted on Contrary to the media, the sex industry doesn't empower women |