Does Cameron believe in meritocracy? Thought not
The Conservatives always maintain that they are a party of merit not privilege.
People should be judged by how hard they work rather than their background, right? That is, after all, why they’re against any form of positive action.
Except, of course, when it applies to them.
Here’s a little nugget from David Cameron: the PR years:
The manner in which he obtained the job says much about how men of Cameron’s background tend to progress through life. The future Tory leader, whose credentials at Conservative central office were already well-established after periods working for Norman Lamont and Michael Howard, believed a stint in the private sector would benefit his political career.
With no experience outside politics, he did what any old Etonian might do and worked his contacts. The mother of Cameron’s then girlfriend Samantha, Lady Astor, was friends with Michael Green, then executive chairman of Carlton and one of Margaret Thatcher’s favourite businessmen. She suggested he hire Cameron, and Green, a mercurial millionaire, obliged. The 27-year-old was duly recruited on a salary of about £90,000 a year (the equivalent of more than £130,000 today).
One former Carlton executive remembers Green often found jobs for family friends and social acquaintances. “At one stage I was asked to find a job for Michael’s daughter and also for Suzie Ratner [daughter of Gerald Ratner, whose jewellery business collapsed after he described his own products as 'crap']. On one hand [Carlton] was kind of a global conglomerate, on the other it was like a family business. It would be ‘my neighbour’s nephew’s daughter’ or ‘someone I met at the synagogue or at Arsenal’ – and not ‘Would you give them a job?’ but ‘Give them a fucking job’”.
Sweet work if you… have the right connections.
(via Next Left)
Here’s another anecdote in the Daily Mail:
When the young Cameron was due to attend a job interview at Conservative Central Office, a phone call was received from Buckingham Palace. “I understand you are to see David Cameron,” said the caller. “I am ringing to tell you that you are about to meet a truly remarkable young man.”
It has been speculated that the mystery call was from Captain Sir Alastair Aird, Equerry to the Queen Mother and husband of Cameron’s godmother. The Airds vigorously denied it.
Others have suggested the caller might have been Sir Brian McGrath, a family friend who was private secretary to Prince Philip. But he, too, though named as a referee for the job, denies it firmly. No matter – the tale provides an illuminating insight into the family’s enviable social standing, and how the ambitious Cameron was helped by well-placed friends and family.
Who says the Tories have ditched identity politics and class war?
---------------------------
| Tweet |
Sunny Hundal is editor of LC. Also: on Twitter, at Pickled Politics and Guardian CIF.
· Other posts by Sunny Hundal
Story Filed Under: News
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
Reader comments
“Who says the Tories have ditched identity politics and class war?”
Nobody who watches what they do, rather than reading what their cheerleaders write.
Brrrring Brrrring
Hello?
Is that the Birmingham Erdington Labour Party?
Yes
Its xxxx from head office. You know Harriet?
Er…Harman?
Yes – well her husband, Jack, wants to be an MP and I need you to put him on the shortlist to replace that baseball cap guy you have as an MP who is standing down.
Well – actually we already have a really good slate of well-qualified candidates – local councillors etc.
I don’t think you understand – Harriet wants him to get a safe seat. Just Give Him a Fucking Job.
Err…ok
The strength of weak ties. I wish I knew people who knew the right people.
Oh come on, how many children of lefties, “educated” at steiner schools and the university of formerpoly (and thus basically unemployable) have landed a job at the BBC/The Arts council/Some ananymous quango, on the basis of their parents connections.
@4 You do come out with some odd things sometimes Matt.
Why don’t you go and find out and write a post on it?
Well from personal experience I know of at least 2 (kids who got good jobs at left wing institutions on the basis of their parents connections). My point is that nepoitism/cronyism is not a preserve of any particular group, left or right.
The issue is not left or right, it is claiming to believe in a meritocracy whilst taking advantage of family connections.
He has done that. Thus his principles are questionable at best. Though I’m not sure I needed this story to confirm this for me, it is blatantly obvious just by listening to his claim to be Dave the Dartman in the Mail. A point also confirmed by the hundreds of Mailers who highlighted it in the comments section.
There is some truth to what Matt Munro says; plenty of examples of “leftwing” nepotism exist.
What’s important is whether the politician in question believes in levelling the playing field or entrenching nepotism. David Cameron’s campaign priorities – raising IHT, fighting any attempt to extend wealth taxes, framing arguments about Death Taxes – clearly point to a man who believes very deeply in the importance of aristocracy and privilege.
Can anyone tell me why ‘meritocracy’ is actually desirable?
Okay, it’s not based on race, or class, or sex, but its just another way of legitimating inequality.
@Shatterface
But some forms of inequality can be legitimate.
@James Graham
Ah, probably correct, we’re all flawed. But right wingers tend to be richer and richer people tend to have more opportunities to nepotise (that a word?). But it’d be interesting to find out if it is any one political spectrums particular preserve.
When it comes to David Cameron, well, his past actions don’t seem to match his current rhetoric.
Left Outside,
I don’t think Cameron’s current rhetoric matches his current rhetoric (if you get my meaning).
C’mon. David Cameron has an illustrious ancestry. He is a direct descendant of William IV, who reigned (1830-37) as monarch and was Queen Victoria’s immediate predecessor:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_IV_of_the_United_Kingdom
“At his death William had no surviving legitimate children, though he was survived by eight of the ten illegitimate children he had by the actress Dorothea Jordan, with whom he cohabited for 20 years.”
So much for family connections.
Sorry but who is Emily Benn precisely?
If any of this third-hand (and third-rate) tittle-tattle is true it is a shame. But it is hardly much more than that.
“If any of this third-hand (and third-rate) tittle-tattle is true it is a shame. But it is hardly much more than that.”
David Cameron even looks a bit like William IV.
The Conservative Party is simply reverting to its traditional values.
Sir William Douglas-Home was the last Conservative PM to be educated at Eton and he was inadvertently defeated at the general election in 1964. The subsequent upstarts who served as Conservative PMs – Ted Heath, Mrs Thatcher and John Major – were all educated at grossly inferior schools. Ted Heath and Mrs Thatcher went to their respective local grammar schools. John Major went to Kings College, Wimbledon, a fee-paying school, but compensated for that by leaving school with only one O-Level.
Reactions: Twitter, blogs
- Liberal Conspiracy
Does Cameron believe in meritocracy? Though not http://bit.ly/byec6m
- IMasterfeed
Liberal Conspiracy » Does Cameron believe in meritocracy? Though not http://bit.ly/dlq6l3
- MusicMP
RT @libcon: Does Cameron believe in meritocracy? Though not http://bit.ly/byec6m
- Sim-O
RT @libcon: Does Cameron believe in meritocracy? Thought not http://bit.ly/byec6m <- Tories? Meritocrasy? Bwahahaha!
- George Allwell
RT @libcon: Does Cameron believe in meritocracy? Thought not http://bit.ly/9l1xFV
- Andrew Roche
RT @pickledpolitics: Do Cameron and the Tories believe in getting ahead on merit? Thought not http://bit.ly/cq8zbW
- sunny hundal
Do Cameron and the Tories believe in getting ahead on merit? Thought not http://bit.ly/cq8zbW
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
You can read articles through the front page, via Twitter or RSS feed. You can also get them by email and through our Facebook group.
» Do older people really need more NHS healthcare?
» There are alternatives to the reckless ‘Plan A’
» On Beecroft: it is already quite easy to sack people
» Why Cameron’s claim of 600,000 jobs created is plainly wrong
» By using age to allocate NHS funding, Lansley rewards Tory voters
» The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an “isolated” problem
» Adrian Beecroft highlights mindset of Tory right
» The US is now a model for the Eurozone to save itself
» The IMF plan to revive the economy doesn’t go far enough
» The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think
» Nine things you can do to halt Lansley’s destruction of our NHS
|
28 Comments 72 Comments 21 Comments 48 Comments 10 Comments 24 Comments 22 Comments 69 Comments 44 Comments 25 Comments |
LATEST COMMENTS » So Much For Subtlety posted on Criticism of Obama for its own sake: a reply to Mehdi Hasan » Jack C posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » bluepillnation posted on The Boris brand is weaker than his friends think » P Ve M posted on Red Tory Blond: gay marriage "homophobic" » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on How Newsnight demonised a single mother » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on The rise in domestic violence deaths is not an "isolated" problem » Ben2 posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? » BenSix posted on '43% of young women sexually harassed' » So Much For Subtlety posted on Do older people really need more NHS healthcare? |










