Comments on: People’s Peers? You’ve got to be kidding! http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/ Left-wing news, opinion and activism Wed, 02 Dec 2015 19:06:04 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=4.9.11 By: Anne O'Nimmus http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-103061 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 23:21:28 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-103061 So they’ve chosen “Elite” Peoples Peers. Middle class shafted again, working class not even a mention. Ah, what we could do with a few cabbies in there…..

]]>
By: George Allwell http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102972 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 16:26:08 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102972 This defies belief, although with expenses and parliamentary privilege, nothing is ever surprising any more.

“Head teachers, police officers, nurses and community leaders were all mentioned as suitable candidates.”

And yet the list at the end of the page shows that the peers are all chief execs, vice chancellors, chairpersons and other top brass.

I can’t see a way to stop them doing this.”

Hurting head in shaking hands. Any trust I had left in this parliamentary democracy has been extinguished this week. Left-wing anarchy anyone 🙂

]]>
By: Flowerpower http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102916 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 12:43:14 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102916 Tony Hall appeared on Question Time a while back and his answers confirmed that he was a Left Establishment type too.

At least the Lord Levy cohort paid a fair price for their honours, though a number of ’em appear to have recouped their investment through the expenses racket.

]]>
By: Yurrzem! http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102905 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:59:06 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102905 No, I like the idea of appointments. I’m sure I could spare a few hours a week given the right incentives.

Not having to go through troublesome elections and public scrutiny is a minor detail, though perhaps it makes the idea more attractive. Care to join me?

]]>
By: Rik Hemsley http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102898 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:35:01 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102898 Similar point made here: http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/uk_politics/2001/open_politics/lords/peoples_peers.stm

“Head teachers, police officers, nurses and community leaders were all mentioned as suitable candidates.”

And yet the list at the end of the page shows that the peers are all chief execs, vice chancellors, chairpersons and other top brass.

I can’t see a way to stop them doing this.

]]>
By: Tim Worstall http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102897 Sat, 06 Feb 2010 10:32:54 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102897 Sortition, that’s what we need. A random lottery.

]]>
By: astateofdenmark http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102875 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:52:40 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102875 Cheers, I’ll send an email. After today and this bizarre fixation on AV, recall, direct democracy, localisation, etc, etc, it’s easy to forget that 8-900 lords a leaping aren’t elected at all. They’re even there for life.

A joke.

]]>
By: J Alfred Prufrock http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102873 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:50:03 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102873 @5

You could try Republic

]]>
By: Unity http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102872 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:43:51 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102872 Try – http://www.unlockdemocracy.org.uk/

]]>
By: astateofdenmark http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102866 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 19:25:22 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102866 Really a democratic lords needs to be the overriding priority now. It’s beyond a joke.

Which organisation, if any, campaigns for a democratic lords as the number one priority? I would like to join.

]]>
By: uberVU - social comments http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102854 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 18:37:32 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102854 Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by libcon: People’s Peers? You’ve got to be kidding! http://bit.ly/cqR7bz

]]>
By: Senorviva http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102832 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:14:37 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102832 “shoving three other well-stuffed members of the establishment in the behind”

What a novel method for reforming the Upper House!

]]>
By: Tim J http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102821 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:35:19 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102821

She will be one of four new non-party-political peers recommended to the Prime Minister by the commission.

This is the Tanni Grey-Thompson who is a member of the Labour party, and appears at Labour fund-raisers? Seems a strange definition of non-party-political.

]]>
By: Watchman http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102812 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:12:31 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102812 At least the political parties tend to nominate people using an obvious bias…

The establishment however tend to take less obvious routes.

]]>
By: sl http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102810 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 16:10:49 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102810 Shameful

I had hoped that this would have been sorted in about 1998.

]]>
By: andrew http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102852 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:32:45 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102852 Liberal Conspiracy » People's Peers? You've got to be kidding!: Liberal Conspiracy. People's Peers? You've got to … http://bit.ly/dABRFk

]]>
By: Andrew Roche http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102843 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:15:09 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102843 People’s Peers? You’ve got to be kidding! http://ff.im/-fsnMp

]]>
By: Chris Paul http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102808 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:58:54 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102808 RT @Unity_MoT: RT @libcon: People's Peers? You've got to be kidding! http://bit.ly/cqR7bz – Another of Blair's wizard wheezes proves to …

]]>
By: Unity http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102806 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:48:06 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102806 RT @libcon: People's Peers? You've got to be kidding! http://bit.ly/cqR7bz – Another of Blair's wizard wheezes proves to be a total crock

]]>
By: Liberal Conspiracy http://liberalconspiracy.org/2010/02/05/peoples-peers-youve-got-to-be-kidding/#comment-102802 Fri, 05 Feb 2010 07:45:52 +0000 http://liberalconspiracy.org/?p=11267#comment-102802 People's Peers? You've got to be kidding! http://bit.ly/cqR7bz

]]>